08.06.2013 Views

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10. Station Coordinates and Velocities<br />

10.2.2.2 Minimum Constraint Solution<br />

Conditions based on Helmert constraints on coordinates of (a subset of) sites with respect<br />

to a reference frame constitute an optimum way for the datum definition of a network. The<br />

definition of the datum is not based on conditions imposed on single reference stations.<br />

Rather, the conditions act on the barycenter of the reference sites or the mean orientation<br />

of the network. This type of datum definition is called minimum constraint solution in the<br />

<strong>Bernese</strong> <strong>GPS</strong> <strong>Software</strong>.<br />

Usually it is sufficient to demand that the barycenter of the estimated reference coordinates<br />

does coincide with the barycenter of the a priori coordinates (no-net-translation condition).<br />

Because the orientation of the network is defined by the introduced orbits, this type of datum<br />

definition is very closely related to the so-called inner constraint solution [Vaníček and<br />

Krakiwsky, 1982]. In some cases, mainly when estimating orbits and EOPs in a global network,<br />

it is necessary to additionally constrain the rotation of the network (no-net-rotation<br />

condition). The scale of the net must only be constrained in very rare cases, e.g., when<br />

estimating satellite antenna phase center variations. To setup the no-net-translation condition<br />

in a global network or not coincides with the decision whether the coordinate origin of<br />

the solution shall be enforced into the coordinate origin of the reference frame or into the<br />

geocenter as it was realized by the solution (see also Section 15.4.4 for detail on estimating<br />

the geocenter).<br />

The advantage of a minimum constraint solution through three translation conditions on<br />

the network’s barycenter is that (small) errors in the coordinates of a reference site do<br />

neither distort the network geometry nor significantly degrade the datum definition per se.<br />

It is thus the recommended method to estimate final results. Please note, that this option is<br />

only available in program ADDNEQ2. The detailed mathematical background is described<br />

in Section 9.3.9.<br />

10.2.2.3 Constraining Reference Coordinates<br />

The geodetic datum can be defined by constraining coordinates of reference stations to<br />

their a priori values. Infinitely tight constraints correspond to fixing reference coordinates<br />

whereas infinitely loose constraints are equivalent to a free network solution. By varying<br />

the constraints you may smoothly shift between these two cases. Depending on the quality<br />

of the reference site coordinates, tightly constraining of several sites may result in network<br />

distortions (“over constraining”).<br />

A solution with a single site constrained to its reference frame position is a particular<br />

minimum constraint solution with the disadvantage that an error in the position of the<br />

single reference site propagates into the positions of all other sites in the network.<br />

The advantage of very tight constraints over fixing coordinates is that the constrained<br />

station coordinates still remain in the resulting normal equation system. Thus it is possible<br />

to change the datum definition later on in ADDNEQ2.<br />

This datum definition type is in general well suited when saving normal equations in program<br />

<strong>GPS</strong>EST.<br />

Page 216 AIUB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!