15.11.2014 Views

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

forest certification <strong>in</strong> estonia<br />

175<br />

<strong>in</strong> forestry adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>and</strong> policy became ever more apparent. To solve these<br />

problems, the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Environment, with support from the F<strong>in</strong>nish government,<br />

launched a <strong>Forest</strong>ry Development Programme (FDP) <strong>in</strong> 1995. This effort resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

the parliamentary approval of the Estonian National <strong>Forest</strong> Policy on June 11, 1997<br />

(FDP 1997; Kallas 2002). The FDP recognizes the importance of susta<strong>in</strong>able forest<br />

management <strong>and</strong> also sets development of forest certification as one of Estonia’s<br />

goals. This was one of the three <strong>in</strong>itial factors that helped FSC-based certification<br />

emerge <strong>in</strong> Estonia (Tonisson 2000).<br />

Figure 1 Annual fell<strong>in</strong>g volumes <strong>in</strong> Estonia 1990-2002<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

Private*<br />

State (RMK)<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

1000 cbm<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

* From 1999 to 2002 the fell<strong>in</strong>g volumes are given accord<strong>in</strong>g to NFI data. The division of fell<strong>in</strong>g volume between<br />

the state <strong>and</strong> the private sector is not known before 1995.<br />

Sources: Yearbook 2001; Yearbook 2002; EFSC 2001; EFSC 2003; RMK 2002; RMK 2003<br />

Approval of the <strong>Forest</strong> Policy led to the 1998 <strong>Forest</strong> Act, which fundamentally<br />

restructured public forestry adm<strong>in</strong>istration (Kallas 2002) <strong>and</strong> ultimately enabled forest<br />

certification to become a reality <strong>in</strong> Estonia <strong>in</strong> its present form. The <strong>Forest</strong> Act authorized<br />

establishment of the State <strong>Forest</strong> Management Center (RMK) <strong>in</strong> 1999, a governmentowned<br />

corporation which went on to obta<strong>in</strong> an FSC forest management certificate for<br />

all of the Estonian state forests. Both policy documents clearly state that the policymak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

functions regard<strong>in</strong>g state forests should be separated from their practical<br />

management (FDP 1997; <strong>Forest</strong> Act 1998), result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the establishment of RMK.<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g RMK’s functions <strong>and</strong> status is important because this organization<br />

is Estonia’s only certified forest manager, aside from one private owner. RMK was the<br />

first (<strong>and</strong> so far only) government-owned profit-mak<strong>in</strong>g organization <strong>in</strong> Estonia.<br />

Thus, RMK took on practical forest management <strong>and</strong> profit-mak<strong>in</strong>g, while the<br />

yale school of forestry & environmental studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!