15.11.2014 Views

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

540<br />

forest certification <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> transition<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

sector participation <strong>in</strong> the forestry sector <strong>and</strong> this has resulted <strong>in</strong> efforts be<strong>in</strong>g made<br />

to export forest products. However, the world market for these products is now<br />

dem<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g certified products, hence various attempts to certify forest products from<br />

Zambian forests.<br />

Domestically, two major factors have been responsible for protect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

forest areas <strong>in</strong> Zambia: the need to conserve areas of biodiversity significance <strong>and</strong> the<br />

need to provide <strong>in</strong>dustrial wood raw material for the various <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> the country,<br />

especially the m<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

The reasons for start<strong>in</strong>g plantations <strong>in</strong> Zambia were: to supplement the limited<br />

supply of timber from the low-yield<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>digenous forests; to provide timber<br />

resources for the m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, as it was feared that the <strong>in</strong>digenous forests would<br />

be exhausted or become uneconomic due to ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g extraction distances; to<br />

form the basis for the wood <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> view of the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g consumption of construction<br />

sawn wood, wood-based panels, various types of pulp products <strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong><br />

round wood products, which all had to be imported, thus exert<strong>in</strong>g pressure on<br />

Zambia’s foreign exchange reserves; <strong>and</strong> to provide employment for thous<strong>and</strong>s of<br />

people <strong>in</strong> forest-related <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>and</strong> the service sector.<br />

Plantation development was started by the government <strong>in</strong> the 1960s on a pilot<br />

scale. To date there are over 55,000ha of <strong>in</strong>dustrial forest plantations <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />

The species used have ma<strong>in</strong>ly been p<strong>in</strong>e (79 percent) <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus (20 percent).<br />

Currently the commercial plantations are be<strong>in</strong>g reduced, as there has not been<br />

enough replant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>/or expansion. It can be stated that the forest plantations have<br />

greatly reduced the pressure on <strong>in</strong>digenous forests <strong>in</strong> the Copperbelt. Until 1991 all<br />

forest plantations were owned by government either directly or through a parastatal<br />

company called Zambia <strong>Forest</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> Industries Corporation (ZAFFICO).<br />

Apart from plantations, this company also operated some softwood sawmills <strong>and</strong> a<br />

pole treatment plant. With the advent of liberalization <strong>in</strong> 1991, the <strong>in</strong>dustrial assets<br />

(sawmills, wood preservation plants <strong>and</strong> carpentry workshops) were sold off together<br />

with part of the plantation. Private companies now own about 2,000ha of the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

55,000ha ZAFFICO plantation.<br />

<strong>Forest</strong>ry Problems<br />

The major forestry problem <strong>in</strong> Zambia is deforestation <strong>and</strong> forest degradation<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g from mismanagement for narrow, short-term ga<strong>in</strong>s (MENR 1997). Eighty<br />

two percent of the forests lie on customary l<strong>and</strong>s. Government ownership is<br />

equivalent to no ownership as there is no one on the ground to control exploitation.<br />

This has promoted forest degradation through illegal harvest<strong>in</strong>g. The str<strong>in</strong>gent<br />

economic programmes that were implemented <strong>in</strong> the 1990s focused on liberalization<br />

<strong>and</strong> reduced state <strong>in</strong>terference <strong>in</strong> the economy. These were accompanied by reduced<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g on social services <strong>and</strong> loss of formal employment, thereby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

poverty levels. The prevalence of poverty <strong>in</strong> rural areas has implications for forestry,<br />

as it rema<strong>in</strong>s the only resource that can provide fall-back support.<br />

The reduced government expenditure has also meant that few resources are<br />

available for the management of forests, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> dim<strong>in</strong>ished government control<br />

yale school of forestry & environmental studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!