15.11.2014 Views

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning ... - UTas ePrints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

forest certification <strong>in</strong> gabon<br />

447<br />

●<br />

<strong>in</strong>adequate scientific knowledge due to the complexity of the tropical<br />

forest ecosystem, although the available scientific <strong>in</strong>formation is not used<br />

adequately <strong>in</strong> forest management.<br />

All these have contributed to, or exacerbated, unsusta<strong>in</strong>able forest management<br />

practices that favour short-term tangible benefits while giv<strong>in</strong>g a lower value to<br />

longer-term solutions. For forest certification to be successful, it will need to address<br />

either the underly<strong>in</strong>g problems or improve the <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacity of those who<br />

attempt to ameliorate them. Indeed, forest certification could play a large role only if<br />

it managed to enforce often un-enforced governmental regulations. However, forest<br />

certification, by itself, appears unable to address the widespread weaknesses of the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutional sett<strong>in</strong>g govern<strong>in</strong>g forest management.<br />

Policy Responses<br />

Traditionally, decisions guid<strong>in</strong>g the forest sector are made by the state, through the<br />

laws <strong>and</strong> regulations such as decrees, arrêté <strong>and</strong> m<strong>in</strong>isterial decisions. Laws are<br />

proposed by the government for adoption by the elected parliament, <strong>and</strong> after<br />

adoption, laws should be promulgated by the President of the Republic for<br />

implementation. There is no <strong>in</strong>stitutionalised public debate on laws before their<br />

adoption. However, <strong>in</strong>formed <strong>in</strong>terested parties (e.g. the logg<strong>in</strong>g enterprises) may<br />

express their op<strong>in</strong>ions on law proposals before adoption. Some parties that are less<br />

<strong>in</strong>formed (e.g. the local populations) have little say <strong>in</strong> the design of laws.<br />

An important <strong>in</strong>fluential party <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the forestry sector of Gabon<br />

is the <strong>in</strong>ternational community, especially the <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

such as the World Bank (WB) <strong>and</strong> the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Low-level<br />

regulations such as m<strong>in</strong>isterial decisions are rarely developed through participatory<br />

approaches. Usually these policies are designed by the technocratic officials with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>and</strong> approved by the M<strong>in</strong>ister. While <strong>in</strong>dustry does have <strong>in</strong>fluence through<br />

lobby<strong>in</strong>g efforts, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational stakeholders through monitor<strong>in</strong>g, the local<br />

populations <strong>and</strong> forest workers have no <strong>in</strong>put at all. Similarly local or national NGOs<br />

are rarely <strong>in</strong>vited to participate <strong>in</strong> the traditional decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process of Gabon,<br />

though on occasion they are kept <strong>in</strong>formed of key decisions.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1992 the Gabon government has undertaken a number of measures to<br />

address the forest problems identified above. These <strong>in</strong>clude reform of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>and</strong> legal framework, as well as the improvement of the technical<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>gs of forest management (ma<strong>in</strong>ly the development of guidel<strong>in</strong>es for forest<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventories, forest management plann<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> timber harvest<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

The most important reform was the adoption of a new forestry code <strong>in</strong> 2001,<br />

which devolved forest management responsibilities to private forest concession<br />

managers. However, the government simultaneously enhanced its rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g law<br />

enforcement, control, <strong>and</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g responsibilities by requir<strong>in</strong>g the managers of<br />

forest concessions to develop forest management plans <strong>and</strong> adhere to other<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able forest management regulations concern<strong>in</strong>g forest <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>and</strong> reduced<br />

impact logg<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

yale school of forestry & environmental studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!