07.01.2013 Views

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

v�������2e���2e���������2€�—�� x€v<br />

2ppshX<br />

2ƒ���X<br />

2w������X<br />

2r‚ƒ2ƒ���X<br />

2seq2ƒ�—���X<br />

2g���—���—���X<br />

2w���—2e������X<br />

€�������2„�2h—��<br />

Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant (AAP) manufactured<br />

pyrotechnic and illuminating signal munitions and<br />

solid-propellant rocket motors. EPA placed the installation on<br />

the NPL in August 1990. The Army and EPA signed an<br />

interagency agreement (IAG) in October 1991. Identified sites<br />

included storage areas, landfills, open burning grounds,<br />

industrial areas, burial pits, sumps, and wastewater treatment<br />

plants. Longhorn AAP became inactive and excess to the<br />

Army's needs in July 1997. The Army awarded a technical<br />

assistance for public participation contract to determine the<br />

effects of on-post contamination on surface water entering<br />

Caddo Lake in FY99. The Army completed a 5-year review in<br />

FY02 for Sites 12, 16, 18, and 24. The installation updated the<br />

community relations plan (CRP) in FY03. In FY04, the<br />

installation formed a Restoration Advisory Board (RAB).<br />

Environmental studies identified 50 sites at the plant, 18 of<br />

which are eligible for the <strong>Installation</strong> Restoration Program (IRP).<br />

The installation divided the sites into five groups. Two Records<br />

of Decision (RODs) and two No Further Action (NFA) RODs<br />

have been completed to date. The Army has transferred<br />

approximately 6,800 acres to date. The cleanup progress at<br />

Longhorn AAP for FY02 through FY05 is detailed below.<br />

In FY02, the Army completed the 5-year review report for<br />

interim actions at Sites 12, 16, 18, and 24. The installation<br />

completed the perchlorate investigation and remedial<br />

investigation (RI) reports, including risk assessments, for<br />

Groups 2 and 4. It also completed the Site 16 feasibility study<br />

(FS). The Army completed an inventory of closed, transferred,<br />

and transferring ranges and sites with unexploded ordnance<br />

(UXO), discarded military munitions, or munitions constituents.<br />

The Army identified three Military Munitions Response Program<br />

(MMRP) sites at this installation.<br />

In FY03, the Army was the recipient of over $1 million of funded<br />

grant work from the Environmental Security Technology<br />

Certification Program and the National Institutes of Health for<br />

field pilot studies designed to treat groundwater contaminated<br />

with perchlorate. The Army completed a successful FS for in<br />

situ treatment of perchlorate in soils. The installation completed<br />

work plans for the background study and ecological risk<br />

Army<br />

„ˆTPIQVPHSPWHH<br />

VDRWQ2—���<br />

v�—���D2—����˜���D2—��2�—���2���������2—��2�������—����2<br />

����—�2���������<br />

QWFVQY2��—��2��2x€v2��2e�����2IWWH<br />

seq2������2��2y��˜��2IWWI<br />

i���������D2��—��2���—��D2†yg�D2�������—��<br />

q������—���D2����—�2�—���D2��������D2����<br />

2p������2��2h—��X<br />

62WWFS2�������<br />

2i��F2g„g2@g���2‰�—�AX 62IWFT2�������@p‰2PHISA<br />

2s‚€Gww‚€2ƒ����2p��—�2‚s€G‚gX p‰2PHHUGp‰2PHHW<br />

2p���E‰�—�2‚�����2ƒ�—���X g��������2—��2��—����<br />

assessment (ERA). The Army held a public meeting, compiled<br />

community surveys, and updated the CRP.<br />

In FY04, the installation conducted a transition and partnering<br />

meeting with regulators, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

(FWS), and other Army personnel in anticipation of the change<br />

in installation managers from Army Material Command to the<br />

Army Headquarters BRAC Division, and a transfer meeting with<br />

the FWS, the General Services Administration, and others to<br />

facilitate property transfer. The installation prepared an<br />

environmental condition of property (ECP) report and<br />

participated in the development of an overarching transfer<br />

memorandum of agreement between FWS and the Army. In 2<br />

separate actions, the Army transferred a total of approximately<br />

5,800 acres to FWS as part of the Caddo Lake National Wildlife<br />

Refuge. The installation prepared a second ECP report to<br />

support the FY05 transfer of a 125-acre tract of CERFA<br />

Category 1 land to the FWS. The installation reviewed the<br />

environmental site assessment/Environmental Baseline Survey<br />

for the Production Area. The installation achieved response<br />

complete (RC) at LHAAP 045 without an RI/FS. The installation<br />

initiated site inspections for three MMRP sites and reviewed<br />

historical record reports and site conceptual models for LHAAP<br />

001 R (South Test Area), 002 R (Static Test Area), and 003 R<br />

(Ground Signal Test Area). The installation held meetings with<br />

regulators and other stakeholders to familiarize them with the<br />

MMRP process and to generate input and approval. The<br />

installation conducted a site tour for regulators and<br />

stakeholders. The installation provided UXO, and munitions and<br />

explosives of concern recognition training to regulators,<br />

stakeholders, and interested public. The installation established<br />

a RAB.<br />

In FY05, the installation awarded a performance-based contract<br />

(PBC) to address most of the remaining environmental<br />

restoration work. The installation completed two FSs for LHAAP<br />

12 and 67. The installation completed the sitewide ERA through<br />

Step 3 and submitted the report to the regulators. The ERA is<br />

now part of the PBC performance work statement. Additional<br />

sampling and evaluation at LHAAP 32 recommended NFA. The<br />

installation completed MMRP site inspections for three sites<br />

and initiated an engineering evaluation and cost analysis<br />

(EE/CA) for each of the sites. The RAB ratified its charter,<br />

elected a co-chair, and held quarterly meetings.<br />

p‰HT2s‚€2€�������<br />

The installation completed the FS for LHAAP 37 and drafted the<br />

proposed plans for LHAAP 8, 32, 37, 48, 53, and 67. Longhorn<br />

AAP signed the ROD for LHAAP 12 and prepared the remedial<br />

design with land use controls. The Army transferred 288 acres<br />

to FWS.<br />

Funding and contractual issues delayed RC at LHAAP 4, 49,<br />

50, 55, 60, and 66. Regulatory issues delayed the RODs for<br />

LHAAP 8, 32, 37, 48, 53, and 67 and the sitewide ERA.<br />

p‰HT2ww‚€2€�������<br />

The installation completed the fieldwork for the three EE/CAs<br />

for three MMRP sites. The Army anticipates that two of the<br />

three sites will require further action. The installation found no<br />

fused munitions at any of the sites.<br />

€�—�2��2e����<br />

Plan of action items for Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant are<br />

grouped below according to program category.<br />

22222s‚€<br />

0 Complete RODs for LHAAP 8, 32, 37, 48, 53,<br />

and 67 in FY07.<br />

0 Complete installationwide ERA in FY07.<br />

0 Achieve RC and complete RODs for LHAAP 4, 49,<br />

50, 55, 60, and 66 under the PBC in<br />

FY07-FY08.<br />

0 Complete 5-year reviews of the interim<br />

remedies at Sites 16, 17, 18, and 24 and the<br />

final remedy at Site 12 in FY07-FY08.<br />

22222ww‚€<br />

0 Complete EE/CAs for three MMRP sites in FY07.<br />

u—��—�D2„��—�<br />

M-116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!