07.01.2013 Views

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

„�����2w—����2g����2e��2ƒ�—���� f‚eg2IWWI<br />

2ppshX<br />

2ƒ���X<br />

2w������X<br />

2r‚ƒ2ƒ���X<br />

2seq2ƒ�—���X<br />

2g���—���—���X<br />

2w���—2e������X<br />

€�������2„�2h—��<br />

In July 1991, the BRAC Commission recommended closure of<br />

Tustin Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) with retention of the<br />

family housing and related personnel facilities to support El<br />

Toro MCAS. In FY93, El Toro MCAS was recommended for<br />

closure, which included those support facilities retained at<br />

Tustin MCAS. A Restoration Advisory Board and a BRAC<br />

cleanup team were formed in FY94. The Navy regularly<br />

updated two administrative records and two information<br />

repositories. The installation signed a federal facility agreement<br />

(FFA) in August 1999 and issued a draft CERFA basewide<br />

Environmental Baseline Survey in FY99.<br />

Since FY85, studies have identified 16 CERCLA sites, 288<br />

areas of concern (AOCs), 129 underground storage tank (UST)<br />

sites, and 25 aboveground storage tank sites. The installation<br />

has signed 5 Records of Decision (RODs) and transferred over<br />

1,300 acres of property. The cleanup progress at Tustin MCAS<br />

for FY02 through FY05 is detailed below.<br />

In FY02, the installation coordinated interim actions at UST Site<br />

222 and Operable Unit (OU) 1A. The installation issued the OU<br />

1B proposed plan (PP). The installation finalized the OU 3<br />

ROD, and drafted the long-term operation and management<br />

(O&M) plan and land use control implementation and<br />

certification plan (LUCICP) for agency review. Additional data<br />

gathering was also conducted at low-risk sites to support the<br />

OU 4 feasibility study (FS). The installation used over a decade<br />

of environmental actions and data to support the economic<br />

development conveyance (EDC) transfer of 1,152 acres to the<br />

City of Tustin and the EDC transfer of 24 acres. Other support<br />

was provided for the public sale of 235 acres. The Navy<br />

completed an inventory for Military Munitions Response<br />

Program (MMRP) sites. No MMRP sites were identified at this<br />

installation.<br />

In FY03, the installation issued the OU 1A FS supported by<br />

data from the FY02 interim action and evaluated the permanent<br />

remedy and the draft ROD, which included enhancement of the<br />

interim groundwater removal action treatment system along<br />

with a soil and groundwater hotspot removal. The installation<br />

continued operations and explored opportunities for<br />

enhancement of the UST Site 222 MTBE groundwater<br />

treatment system. The installation issued the draft final version<br />

Navy<br />

geWIUQHPRUVQHH<br />

IDTHQ2—���<br />

ƒ��������2����—�����2��2���2„����2w—����2e���—��2‡���<br />

xGe<br />

ppe2������2��2e�����2IWWW<br />

†yg�D2����������—��D2�������������D2„giD2„g€D2f„iˆD2<br />

�—����—����D2���������2�����—�˜���D2����—�����������D2<br />

w„fi<br />

q������—���2—��2����<br />

2p������2��2h—��X<br />

62TPFR2�������<br />

2i��F2g„g2@g���2‰�—�AX 62PUFH2�������@p‰2PHQTA<br />

2s‚€Gww‚€2ƒ����2p��—�2‚s€G‚gX p‰2PHIIGx���<br />

2p���E‰�—�2‚�����2ƒ�—���X €�—����<br />

of the OU 1B ROD, which included a groundwater treatment<br />

and soil removal remedy at two sites, after modifications to<br />

incorporate the recent Navy/EPA Land Use Controls Principles<br />

and Procedures Agreement. The installation implemented the<br />

OU 3 O&M plan/LUCICP and completed the operating properly<br />

and successfully (OP&S) certification. The installation<br />

completed revising the remedy strategy at Site ST 16A/B to a<br />

petroleum corrective action for polyaromatic hydrocarbons<br />

(PAHs). It also completed developing the removal strategy at<br />

the arsenic AOC site in partnership with redevelopment<br />

activities by the City of Tustin. The installation also completed<br />

sampling at several OU 4 sites to support a dual exit strategy<br />

for these low-risk sites.<br />

In FY04, Tustin MCAS obtained OP&S concurrence for the<br />

Moffet Trenches landfill and OU 3. The installation also<br />

completed additional soil removal and treatment system<br />

enhancements at the UST Site 222 MTBE site. In addition, the<br />

installation continued development of the OU 1B remedial<br />

design (RD), completed the petroleum corrective action at Site<br />

ST 16A/B, and initiated the removal action at the arsenic AOC<br />

site. The Navy issued a draft RD for OU 1.<br />

In FY05, Tustin MCAS completed a time-critical removal action<br />

for OU 1A and issued a final ROD/remedial action plan (RAP).<br />

The installation completed selected soil removal activities<br />

associated with the OU 1A remedial action (RA). The Navy<br />

issued the final ROD/RAP for OU 1B and completed a work<br />

plan and field activities. Long-term management (LTM)<br />

continued at OU 3. The installation issued a final No Further<br />

Action ROD/RAP for OU 4A. The installation issued an FS for<br />

OU 4B. The installation finalized the closure report for the<br />

arsenic AOC. Tustin MCAS developed and obtained<br />

concurrence from California Regional Water Quality Control<br />

Board of closure criteria for the MTBE groundwater site. The<br />

installation closed the last AOC in the compliance program.<br />

p‰HT2s‚€2€�������<br />

Tustin MCAS conducted a 5-year review at OU 3 for the<br />

continued LTM phase of a landfill cap. In addition, the<br />

installation completed soil removal activities at OUs 1A and 1B.<br />

The Navy developed a tiered closure criteria for the MTBE<br />

groundwater site.<br />

The installation began a revised draft FS; however, regulatory<br />

issues delayed the final FS and PP for OU 4B. In addition,<br />

regulatory issues delayed the RD/RA work plan for groundwater<br />

OUs 1A and 1B.<br />

p‰HT2ww‚€2€�������<br />

The Navy has identified no MMRP sites at this installation.<br />

€�—�2��2e����<br />

Plan of action items for Tustin Marine Corps Air Station are<br />

grouped below according to program category.<br />

22222s‚€<br />

0 Complete the RD/RA work plan and field<br />

activities for groundwater at OUs 1A and 1B<br />

in FY07.<br />

0 Finalize 5-year review and continue LTM at OU<br />

3 in FY07.<br />

0 Revise draft FS, complete PP, and conduct a<br />

public meeting for OU 4B in FY07.<br />

0 Continue MTBE groundwater site remediation in<br />

FY07-FY08.<br />

22222ww‚€<br />

There are no MMRP actions scheduled for FY07 or<br />

FY08.<br />

„�����D2g—�������—<br />

M-195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!