Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

h������2ƒ�����2g�����2‚������ x€v
2ppshX
2ƒ���X
2w������X
2r‚ƒ2ƒ���X
2seq2ƒ�—���X
2g���—���—���X
2w���—2e������X
€�������2„�2h—��
Defense Supply Center Richmond (DSCR) provides aviation
weapon systems and environmental logistics support for DoD.
EPA placed the installation on the NPL in July 1987 and the
installation signed an interagency agreement (IAG) in 1991.
Petroleum/oil/lubricants (POLs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
solvents, metals, and pesticides have been identified in the
groundwater and soil at the installation. Remedial technologies
used at DSCR have included soil vapor extraction, air stripping,
dual-phase extraction, density-driven convection, and
pump-and-treat remedy. The installation formed a Restoration
Advisory Board (RAB) and implemented a community relations
plan (CRP) in FY02. Five-year reviews were completed in
FY97, FY99, FY02, and FY05.
Studies at DSCR have identified 32 sites, 13 of which have
been organized into operational units (OUs). To date, the
installation has signed eight Records of Decision (RODs), some
of which are interim RODs. The cleanup progress at DSCR for
FY02 through FY05 is detailed below.
In FY02, remedial process optimization studies were conducted
for OUs 8 and 9. A consolidated 5-year review was performed
for OUs 1, 3, and 9. The installation formed a RAB and
implemented the CRP. The RAB held various training exercises
and meetings to inform the members of progress to date. The
installation provided a tour of the facility to the RAB.
In FY03, the installation prepared a detailed supplemental
focused feasibility study (FS) work plan and began the field
activities at four sites (OUs 6, 7, 8, and 13). The supplemental
FS work plan employs an investigation strategy based on
systematic planning, a dynamic work plan, and the use of
on-site analytical tools. A consolidated 5-year review report was
completed for OUs 1, 3, and 9. An expanded basewide well
survey was completed. Operations and maintenance monitoring
of the OUs 8 and 9 remedial systems was optimized using
suggestions from the Phase II remedial process optimization
report. The installation completed a community involvement
plan. Partnering activities with state and federal regulators were
conducted.
DLA
†eQWUISPHUSIHH
STS2—���
€������2��������2�������2@—��—����2��—���2������2—��2
�����������—�A2���2h�h
QQFVSY2��—��2��2x€v2��2t���2IWVU
seq2������2��2IWWI
€yv�D2������—���2†yg�D2€er�D2��������D2���������D2���—��
q������—���2—��2����
2p������2��2h—��X
62SWFP2�������
2i��F2g„g2@g���2‰�—�AX 62PQFS2�������@p‰2PHQSA
2s‚€Gww‚€2ƒ����2p��—�2‚s€G‚gX p‰2PHIQGx���
2p���E‰�—�2‚�����2ƒ�—���X g��������
In FY04, DSCR conducted a basewide supplemental FS to
refine the conceptual site model (CSM) and to screen
technologies for remediation of groundwater. The study
employed the Triad method, which integrates systematic
planning, dynamic work plans, and on-site analytical tools to
meet project and program goals. DSCR also submitted an
action memo and removal site evaluation for a principal threat
source material removal action. The memorandum supported a
time-critical removal of persistent sources to groundwater
contamination at DSCR's former fire training pit area at OU 4.
The installation completed a second revised focused FS for OU
12, a former pesticide storage building. The report identified
and screened remedial alternatives consistent with industrial
risked-based action levels and long-term institutional controls.
DSCR conducted a rebound study for the Acid Neutralization
Pit groundwater OU 8 site.
In FY05, DSCR completed a time-critical principal threat source
material removal action and associated closeout report at the
OU 4. Over 1,200 tons of hazardous waste was removed. Cost
savings were realized by using an on-site laboratory to perform
confirmation sampling, which enabled project managers to
make quick decisions in the field. The installation also
completed the DSCR CSM, and the management action plan to
identify and manage the restoration program requirements. The
proposed plan (PP) for OU 12 was completed. Additionally, the
installation initiated a land use control (LUC) implementation
plan, and risk assessments for OUs 10 and 11. RAB meetings
continued to inform the public of progress to date.
p‰HT2s‚€2€�������
DSCR submitted the installation's first ROD for groundwater
media OU 8. The installation submitted PPs for OUs 10 and 11
to the regulatory agencies which prescribed LUCs for former
pesticide sites. DSCR also completed the FFSs for OUs 10 and
11. DSCR completed the FFS for OU 2, a former landfill in the
central part of the installation. An FFS and screening level
ecological risk assessment for OU 13 were submitted to the
agencies. The installation finalized a comprehensive CSM in
concurrence with the regulatory agencies. DSCR initiated the
remedial action construction phase at OU 12. The installation
completed the PP and FFS for OU 8 and the ROD for OU 12.
The installation submitted risk assessments for OUs 10 and 11
as part of the FFSs. DSCR initiated the interim remedial action
(RA) for OU 9.
Funding issues delayed the PP completion of OUs 2, 6 and 7
treatability studies. Technical issues delayed completion of
RODs for OUs 10 and 11. Regulatory issues delayed the
proposed RA plans for OUs 10 and 11.
The installation also continued RAB meetings to inform the
public of progress to date.
p‰HT2ww‚€2€�������
DLA has identified no Military Munitions Response Program
(MMRP) sites at this installation.
‚������D2†������—
€�—�2��2e����
Plan of action items for Defense Supply Center Richmond are
grouped below according to program category.
22222s‚€
0 Complete RODs for OUs 10 and 11 in FY07.
0 Issue PPs and RODs for OUs 2 and 13 in FY07.
0 Complete remedial design for OU-8 in FY07.
0 Complete consolidated 5-year review in FY07.
22222ww‚€
There are no MMRP actions scheduled for FY07 or
FY08.
M-49