07.01.2013 Views

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

„���2g�����2e���2e���������2€�—�� x€v<br />

2ppshX<br />

2ƒ���X<br />

2w������X<br />

2r‚ƒ2ƒ���X<br />

2seq2ƒ�—���X<br />

2g���—���—���X<br />

2w���—2e������X<br />

€�������2„�2h—��<br />

Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (AAP) formerly<br />

manufactured small arms ammunition and projectile casings,<br />

and supported DoD tenants. Past waste disposal practices<br />

released contaminants into soil, groundwater, and sediment.<br />

Contaminated groundwater has impacted municipal water<br />

supplies. Ammunition-related metals, volatile organic<br />

compounds (VOCs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are<br />

the primary soil contaminants at the installation. In September<br />

1983, EPA placed the installation on the NPL. Twin Cities AAP<br />

established a technical review committee in 1985 and a<br />

Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) in FY96. From FY86 to<br />

FY93, the Army installed soil and groundwater extraction and<br />

treatment systems. The installation constructed a boundary<br />

groundwater containment system to contain and treat<br />

VOC-contaminated groundwater at the installation's southwest<br />

boundary. The Army provided a groundwater treatment system<br />

for the City of New Brighton and a municipal water supply<br />

hookup at Lowry Grove Trailer Park. The Army, State of<br />

Minnesota, and EPA signed a federal facility agreement (FFA)<br />

in 1987. In FY95, the installation completed an unexploded<br />

ordnance (UXO) sweep in support of the CERCLA site<br />

cleanups. The Army procured a technical assistance for public<br />

participation contract to support the RAB in FY99. The Army<br />

completed 5-year reviews of Operable Units (OUs) 1, 2, and 3<br />

in FY99 and FY04.<br />

The installation grouped 25 sites, including former landfills,<br />

burning and burial grounds, ammunition testing and disposal<br />

sites, industrial operations buildings, and sewer system<br />

discharge areas, into 3 OUs. To date, the Army has signed<br />

three Records of Decision (RODs). The cleanup progress at<br />

Twin Cities AAP for FY02 through FY05 is detailed below.<br />

In FY02, the Army completed remedial action construction<br />

(RA-C) fieldwork at Sites 129-3 and 129-15, and began the<br />

RA-C reconfiguration of the Twin Cities AAP groundwater<br />

recovery system (TGRS) for OU 2. The installation completed<br />

the remedial design and RA workplan for Site D metals. Staged<br />

completion of the OU 3 requirements continued. The regulators<br />

approved a revised cleanup goal at Site G, resulting in no<br />

further action for VOC-contaminated soil at the site. The<br />

installation initiated design work for a cover over the dump at<br />

Site G. The regulators approved the 135 and 535 Primer/Tracer<br />

Army<br />

wxSPIQVPHWHVHH<br />

PDQUH2—���<br />

€������2�������2��2h�h2���—���Y2��������2�—���—�����2<br />

��—��E—���2—���������2—��2���������2—�����<br />

SWFTHY2��—��2��2x€v2��2ƒ�����˜��2IWVQ<br />

ppe2������2��2e�����2IWVU<br />

†yg�D2€gf�D2��—��2���—��<br />

q������—���D2����—�2�—���D2��������D2����<br />

2p������2��2h—��X<br />

62ISTFR2�������<br />

2i��F2g„g2@g���2‰�—�AX 62QIFH2�������@p‰2PHRHA<br />

2s‚€Gww‚€2ƒ����2p��—�2‚s€G‚gX p‰2PHIHGx���<br />

2p���E‰�—�2‚�����2ƒ�—���X g��������2—��2��—����<br />

Area preliminary assessments and the 135 workplan site<br />

inspection (SI). The SI work commenced at the Building 135<br />

Primer/Tracer Area. The Army abandoned 31 unused<br />

monitoring wells, both on and off the installation. The regulators<br />

approved closeout reports for the Grenade Range and the<br />

Outdoor Firing Range.<br />

In FY03, the Army completed RA-C fieldwork at Site A (VOC<br />

soils), Site D (metal soils), and the removal of the corrective<br />

action management unit (CAMU), and submitted the respective<br />

closeout reports. The regulators approved the closeout reports<br />

for Site 129-3 and Site 129-15, with the exception of land use<br />

control (LUC) requirements. The regulators approved the<br />

reconfiguration plan for the TGRS. The installation completed<br />

the SI fieldwork for both the 135 and 535 Primer/Tracer Areas.<br />

RA-C fieldwork began to upgrade the cover for the Site G dump<br />

and to place a cover at the 1900 Yard Range. At Site C, the<br />

Army obtained approval for a work plan and performed<br />

additional characterization work. The Army commissioned a<br />

Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment to support<br />

future property transfers. The Army conducted an inventory of<br />

closed, transferred, and transferring ranges and sites with UXO,<br />

discarded military munitions, or munitions constituents that<br />

identified no Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP)<br />

sites at the installation.<br />

In FY04, the installation completed the cover construction at<br />

Site G. The regulators approved the closeout reports for Site A<br />

(1945 Trench) and Site D, both with the exception of LUCs, the<br />

closeout report for the CAMU (with no LUCs), and the second<br />

5-year review.<br />

In FY05, Twin Cities AAP obtained regulatory approval for the<br />

Tier II ecological risk assessment for various water bodies, and<br />

the Army initiated a feasibility study (FS) to evaluate remedies.<br />

Regulators also approved the closeout report for Site G (except<br />

LUCs), the SI reports for the 135 and 535 Primer/Tracer Areas,<br />

and an evaluation report for the vapor intrusion pathway off the<br />

installation.<br />

p‰HT2s‚€2€�������<br />

Twin Cities AAP received regulatory approval for an<br />

alternatives analysis addressing revised and new remedies for<br />

Site C. A ROD Amendment was signed for OU 1, resolving<br />

disagreements over groundwater containment and the need for<br />

further action deeper in the aquifer. Additionally, the Army<br />

signed another ROD Amendment for OU 3, documenting the<br />

final decision to turn off the extraction well. Contaminated<br />

sediment was removed from a ditch near the 135 Primer/Tracer<br />

Area and the closeout report was approved by the regulators.<br />

With the exception of LUCs, the regulators also approved a<br />

closeout report for construction of a cover over contaminated<br />

soil at the 1900 Yard Range of the Outdoor Firing Range.<br />

Regulatory issues delayed the LUC issue resolution and ROD<br />

amendments for various soil sites. Regulatory issues also<br />

delayed approval and trustee concurrence for the aquatic sites<br />

FS.<br />

p‰HT2ww‚€2€�������<br />

The Army has identified no MMRP sites at this installation.<br />

e����2r����D2w�������—<br />

€�—�2��2e����<br />

Plan of action items for Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant are<br />

grouped below according to program category.<br />

22222s‚€<br />

0 Resolve LUC issues and sign ROD amendments<br />

for various soil sites in FY07.<br />

0 Initiate engineering evaluation and cost<br />

analysis for 135 and 535 Primer/Tracer Areas<br />

and Building 102 in FY07.<br />

0 Complete the soil and sediment remedies at<br />

Site C in FY08.<br />

0 Obtain regulatory approval and trustee<br />

concurrence for the aquatic sites FS in FY08.<br />

22222ww‚€<br />

There are no MMRP actions scheduled for FY07 or<br />

FY08.<br />

M-196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!