07.01.2013 Views

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

Appendix M: Installation Narrative Summaries - denix

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e��2p���2€�—��2x�F2RR x€v<br />

2ppshX<br />

2ƒ���X<br />

2w������X<br />

2r‚ƒ2ƒ���X<br />

2seq2ƒ�—���X<br />

2g���—���—���X<br />

2w���—2e������X<br />

€�������2„�2h—��<br />

Air Force Plant No. 44 (AFP 44), located adjacent to Tucson<br />

International Airport, was constructed in 1951 to manufacture<br />

Falcon air-to-air missiles. Over the years, industrial facilities<br />

were constructed to support several other missile systems. EPA<br />

placed the entire Tucson International Airport Area, including<br />

AFP 44, on the NPL in 1983. Contaminants identified at the<br />

installation include solvents, machine coolants and lubricants,<br />

paint sludges and thinners, and heavy metals. The installation<br />

formed a Restoration Advisory Board, which was later<br />

converted to a Unified Community Advisory Board (UCAB). The<br />

installation conducted a 5-year review for six soil sites in FY04.<br />

AFP 44 occupies approximately 27.5 acres of the Tucson<br />

International Airport, which totals 1,374 acres. To date, Records<br />

of Decision (RODs) have been signed for three soil vapor<br />

extraction (SVE) sites, three soil excavation sites, and one<br />

groundwater remediation site. A no further action ROD was<br />

signed for four sites. The cleanup progress at AFP 44 for FY02<br />

through FY05 is detailed below.<br />

In FY02, the installation completed the closeout of the Site 2<br />

system and determined that the remaining trace concentrations<br />

of trichloroethylene (TCE) would not adversely affect<br />

groundwater quality. Operation and maintenance (O&M) of the<br />

groundwater reclamation system, SVE systems, and<br />

dual-phase extraction (DPE) systems continued. The<br />

installation analyzed groundwater samples for the presence of<br />

1,4-dioxane. A draft of the 5-year review was completed and<br />

the installation awaited stakeholder comments on the document<br />

before finalizing it. Several actions of the remedial process<br />

optimization Phase III were implemented. The installation<br />

maintained an active role in the joint UCAB that represents<br />

parties responsible for the Tucson International Airport Area<br />

Superfund Site (TIAASS). The Air Force issued an updated<br />

draft community relations plan (CRP), and updated a workshop<br />

and notebook that summarizes information about TIAASS.<br />

In FY03, the installation conducted an expanded in situ pilot<br />

project at Site 2 using potassium permanganate. EPA Region 9<br />

submitted a limited draft risk assessment for 1,4-dioxane. O&M<br />

of the groundwater reclamation system, SVE systems, and<br />

DPE systems continued. The installation submitted the draft<br />

final Site 2 closure report to regulators for review and<br />

Air Force<br />

e WSUIUPRTPWHH<br />

IDQUR2—���<br />

‚���—��D2������D2—��2�—���—����2��������<br />

SUFVTY2��—��2��2x€v2��2IWVQ<br />

x�����—�����2������—�<br />

w—����2���—���D2�—����2��˜��—���D2�—���2�������D2�—���2<br />

��������D2��—��2���—��D2��������<br />

q������—���2—��2����<br />

2p������2��2h—��X<br />

62USFT2�������<br />

2i��F2g„g2@g���2‰�—�AX 62RQFW2�������@p‰2PHQHA<br />

2s‚€Gww‚€2ƒ����2p��—�2‚s€G‚gX p‰2PHHWGx���<br />

2p���E‰�—�2‚�����2ƒ�—���X g��������<br />

concurrence. Comments were received from the regulators on<br />

the draft final 5-year review, which was under revision.<br />

In FY04, AFP 44 conducted an expanded in situ pilot project at<br />

Site 3 and submitted a work plan. The installation also<br />

completed the SVE at Sites 3 and 5 and monitored soil gas for<br />

1 year. In addition, the installation completed the 1,4-dioxane<br />

risk assessment and determined the necessary future actions.<br />

The Air Force submitted the findings to regulators and is<br />

awaiting comments. AFP 44 continued O&M of the groundwater<br />

reclamation system, SVE systems, and DPE systems. The<br />

installation continued the Site 2 in situ pilot, resulting in most of<br />

the Site 2 wells being below drinking water standards.<br />

Regulators approved the Site 2 closure report. Sites 3 and 5<br />

were shut off and soil gas will be monitored to verify that the act<br />

of removing contamination in the vadose posed no threat to the<br />

groundwater. AFP 44 completed the 5-year review for six soil<br />

sites. The installation updated and finalized the AFP 44 CRP.<br />

In FY05, AFP 44 completed the Site 3 permanganate injection<br />

and future monitoring results will determine the effectiveness of<br />

the permanganate injections. The installation conducted soil<br />

gas monitoring for Sites 3 and 5. The results indicate most of<br />

the wells are non-detect. AFP 44 continued O&M of<br />

groundwater reclamation system and the DPE was eliminated<br />

because the source areas have been addressed. The Air Force<br />

updated its Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP)<br />

inventory. No MMRP sites were identified at this installation<br />

during the inventory development.<br />

p‰HT2s‚€2€�������<br />

AFP 44 submitted the closure documents for Sites 3 and 5.<br />

The Air Force is updating the documents based on comments<br />

from EPA Region 9 and the Arizona Department of<br />

Environmental Quality. Additionallly, the Air Force reinjected<br />

more permanganate at Sites 2 and 3 because of the rebound of<br />

TCE concentrations in the monitoring wells. The Air Force is<br />

using soybean and lactic acid to clean up the chromium and<br />

TCE source areas that migrated from Solid Waste Management<br />

Unit D (SWMU D), the former chromium plating area in Building<br />

801. The installation continued O&M of the groundwater<br />

reclamation system. The cost of completing environmental<br />

restoration has changed significantly due to technical issues.<br />

Regulatory issues delayed completion of the closure reports for<br />

Sites 3 and 5.<br />

p‰HT2ww‚€2€�������<br />

The Air Force has identified no MMRP sites at this installation.<br />

€�—�2��2e����<br />

Plan of action items for Air Force Plant No. 44 are grouped<br />

below according to program category.<br />

22222s‚€<br />

0 Complete the closure reports for Sites 3 and<br />

5 in FY07.<br />

0 Reduce the mass of source areas for Sites 2<br />

and 3 by permanganate injection in FY07.<br />

0 Continue cleanup of the chromium and TCE<br />

plume underneath Building 801 which is<br />

migrating from SWMU D in FY07.<br />

0 Continue O&M of the groundwater reclamation<br />

system in FY07.<br />

22222ww‚€<br />

There are no MMRP actions scheduled for FY07 or<br />

FY08.<br />

„����D2e�����—<br />

M-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!