02.03.2013 Views

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

124 NORMATIVE THEORY OF PROBABILITY<br />

of probability as a proportion of cases, then we want to know what proportion of the<br />

cases with D also have H. This is just the number of cases with D <strong>and</strong> H divided<br />

by the number with D.<br />

Formula 1 expresses an important implication of the multiplication rule: our<br />

judgment of the conditional probability of A given B — our judged probability of A<br />

if we learned that B were true — should be equal to the ratio of our judgment of the<br />

probability of A <strong>and</strong> B to our judgment of the probability of B.<br />

Formula 1 does not help us much, because we don’t know p(H & D). But we do<br />

know p(D|H) <strong>and</strong> p(H), <strong>and</strong> we know from the multiplication rule that p(D & H) =<br />

p(D|H) · p(H). Of course p(D & H) is the same as p(H & D), so we can replace<br />

p(H & D) in formula 1 to get:<br />

p(D|H) · p(H)<br />

p(H|D) = (5.2)<br />

p(D)<br />

Formula 2 is useful because it refers directly to the information we have. In the<br />

example, p(D—H) is .90, <strong>and</strong> p(H) is .10, except for p(D). But we can calculate that<br />

too. There are two ways for D to occur; it can occur with H or without H (that is,<br />

with ∼H. These are mutually exclusive, so we can apply the additivity rule to get:<br />

p(D) = p(D & H)+p(D & ∼H)<br />

= p(D|H) · p(H)+p(D|∼H) · p(∼H)<br />

This leads (by substitution into formula 2) to formula 3:<br />

p(D|H) · p(H)<br />

p(H|D) =<br />

(5.3)<br />

p(D|H) · p(H)+p(D|∼H) · p(∼H)<br />

Formulas 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 are called Bayes’s theorem. They are named after Rev. Thomas<br />

Bayes, who first recognized their importance in a theory of personal probability<br />

(Bayes 1764/1958). In formula 3, p(H|D) is usually called the posterior probability<br />

of H, meaning the probability after D is known, <strong>and</strong> p(H) is called the prior probability,<br />

meaning the probability before D is known. p(D|H) is sometimes called the<br />

likelihood of D.<br />

Formula 3 is illustrated in Figure 5.1. The whole square represents all of the<br />

possible patients. The square is divided, by a vertical line, into those patients with<br />

cancer, on the right (indicated with p(H) =.1), <strong>and</strong> those without cancer (indicated<br />

with p(∼ H) =.9). The height of the shaded region in each part represents the<br />

conditional probability of a positive test result for each group, p(D|H) =.9 <strong>and</strong><br />

p(D| ∼H) =.2, respectively. The darker shaded region represents the possible<br />

patients with cancer <strong>and</strong> positive results. Its area (.09) represents the probability<br />

of being such a patient, which is the product of the prior probability (.1) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

conditional probability of a positive result (.9). Likewise, the area of the lighter<br />

shaded region (.18) represents the probability of being a patient with a positive result<br />

<strong>and</strong> no cancer. Possible patients with positive results are in the two shaded regions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!