02.03.2013 Views

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 18<br />

Social dilemmas: Cooperation<br />

versus defection<br />

The best chance for gains comes through cooperation.<br />

Fortune cookie message<br />

This chapter focuses on a specific type of decision problem: decisions involving<br />

situations in which the narrow self-interest of each person in a group conflicts with<br />

the interest of the group as a whole. Retired people who have medical insurance that<br />

covers all expenses st<strong>and</strong> to gain (from extra medical attention <strong>and</strong> reassurance) if<br />

they visit their doctor weekly, sick or not, but if everyone in their group did this,<br />

their insurance premiums would skyrocket. People who watch viewer-supported<br />

television can save their money by not contributing to support the station they watch,<br />

but if everyone did this the station would be off the air, <strong>and</strong> all who like to watch<br />

it would suffer. Each farmer st<strong>and</strong>s to gain from letting the family cows graze on<br />

the commons, the common pasture for the town, but if everyone did this the pasture<br />

would disappear (Hardin, 1968).<br />

Such situations are called social dilemmas, orcommons dilemmas (by analogy<br />

with the common-pasture example). 1 In a simple social dilemma, each person is<br />

better off doing one sort of thing (given what others do), but all are better off if all do<br />

something else. The action that is best for all is called cooperation; the action best<br />

for the self is called defection. 2 It is best for all (cooperative) not to overgraze the<br />

common pasture but best for each to do so.<br />

1 Other terms used for the same idea, or variants of it, are: public goods problem; prisoner’s dilemma;<br />

externalities; <strong>and</strong> free-rider problem.<br />

2 The basic theory of cooperation <strong>and</strong> defection comes from the mathematical theory of games, which<br />

was developed largely by the mathematician John von Neumann as early as the 1920s. This theory first<br />

attracted the attention of social scientists <strong>and</strong> philosophers in the early 1950s, after the publication of von<br />

Neumann <strong>and</strong> Morgenstern’s Theory of Game <strong>and</strong> Economic Behavior (1947), the same book that called<br />

attention to utility theory.<br />

441

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!