02.03.2013 Views

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NORMATIVE AND PRESCRIPTIVE THEORY OF SOCIAL DILEMMAS 447<br />

Figure 18.2: Total utility for cooperators (those who do not walk on the grass) <strong>and</strong><br />

defectors as a function of the percentage of cooperators. Utility comes from both the<br />

appearance of the grass <strong>and</strong> taking the shortcut.<br />

already walked on the grass, though, one more will not make any difference, because<br />

it will be too late to save the lawn.<br />

We can diagram the situation as in Figure 18.2. The upper curve is for defectors,<br />

because there is always some personal benefit to taking the shortcut. Notice that<br />

the slope — the benefit to others from cooperation — changes as a function of the<br />

number of cooperators. In the middle region, around 50%, the slope is highest,<br />

because at that point an additional defector ruins a little more grass, <strong>and</strong> so the benefit<br />

to all decreases.<br />

The cooperative theory states that one should choose whatever would be best<br />

for everyone if everyone made the same choice. In all of the examples given so far,<br />

it would be better if everyone cooperated, so everyone should cooperate. Indeed,<br />

Dawes (1980) defines “social dilemmas” as situations in which defection increases<br />

personal benefit (holding constant the actions of others) but the benefit of each is<br />

maximized if all choose cooperation. In the grass-walking example, nobody should<br />

take the shortcut, no matter how many others did likewise. The cooperative theory<br />

is a natural extension of the contractual view of morality discussed in Chapter 16. It<br />

holds that the right question to ask is “If we were all going to agree to do one thing<br />

or the other, what would we agree to do?” Of course, given the choice between all<br />

cooperating <strong>and</strong> all defecting, we are all better off if we cooperate, so that is what we<br />

would agree to do. Then, by imagining that a hypothetical contract has already been<br />

made, it holds that cooperation is what each of us should do. If we do not cooperate,<br />

we violate the contract.<br />

The problem with the cooperative theory is that following it often leads to harm<br />

<strong>and</strong> no good (Regan, 1980). If everyone has already trampled the grass to death,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!