02.03.2013 Views

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

Thinking and Deciding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING 179<br />

Table 7.1: ET scan results <strong>and</strong> incidence of three diseases in 100 patients<br />

Test result Globoma Popitis Flapemia<br />

Positive ET scan 40 10 0<br />

Negative ET scan 40 0 10<br />

All patients 80 10 10<br />

Expected utility applies to a choice with probabilistic (uncertain) outcomes. It is<br />

the average utility we would obtain if we made the same choice repeatedly <strong>and</strong> the<br />

outcomes occurred with their respective probabilities. It is therefore the utility we<br />

can expect on the average. In these problems, there are two choices: test or no test.<br />

(There are also essentially two outcomes, correct treatment or incorrect treatment.)<br />

To calculate expected utility, we consider all of the outcomes of a given choice, such<br />

as not testing. We multiply the probability of each outcome (given the choice) by its<br />

utility, <strong>and</strong> we add up these numbers across the outcomes. For example, in problem<br />

1, for no test the probability of a correct treatment is .8 (assuming we treat globoma),<br />

<strong>and</strong> the probability of an incorrect treatment is .2. The utility of a correct treatment<br />

is (we have assumed) 1, <strong>and</strong> the utility of an incorrect treatment is 0. The expected<br />

utility of this choice (no test) is thus .8 · 1+.2 · 0, or .8. Because we have defined<br />

the utility of a good outcome as 1 <strong>and</strong> the utility of a bad outcome as 0, the expected<br />

utility is equal to the probability of a good outcome.<br />

Note that the utility of the other choice, testing, is the same. The probability of<br />

correct treatment is still .8, with or without doing the test. This is because doing the<br />

test cannot change the overall probability that the patient has globoma. Table 7.1<br />

may make this clear. The top two rows show ET scan test results for 100 patients,<br />

indicating how many patients with each disease had each test result. The bottom row,<br />

the sum of the other two rows, shows the overall prevalence of the three diseases. If<br />

no test is done, the figures in the row for “all patients” allow us to calculate the<br />

probability of the three diseases: .8 for globoma <strong>and</strong> .1 for each of the others. If the<br />

test is done <strong>and</strong> is positive, the top row indicates that the probability of globoma is<br />

still .8. The same is found for a negative result. Therefore the test outcome cannot<br />

affect our judgment of the probability of globoma, the most likely disease, <strong>and</strong> we<br />

should treat globoma with or without knowledge of the test result.<br />

Table 7.2 gives similar information for problem 2. In this case, the test can affect<br />

the probability of the most likely disease, but it again cannot affect our decision about<br />

treatment. If we do not do the test, we will have an 80% chance of giving the correct<br />

treatment, so the expected utility of this choice would be .8 · 1+.2 · 0, or .8. If we do<br />

the test <strong>and</strong> it is positive, the expected utility would be higher. Likewise, if the test<br />

is negative, the expected utility would be lower: but we must decide whether or not<br />

to do the test before we know what the outcome will be. Therefore, we must think

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!