02.11.2012 Views

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Does this mean that metaphysics should be reduced<br />

to science? How does this discussion bear on what was<br />

said <strong>in</strong> this paper? Here, I want to suggest one last<br />

antireductionist idea. Ano<strong>the</strong>r possible way of look<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

metaphysics, alternative to <strong>the</strong> view of it as a mere ‘byproduct’<br />

of science, is as an autonomous discipl<strong>in</strong>e hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to do with hypo<strong>the</strong>ses ra<strong>the</strong>r than truths; <strong>and</strong> as an <strong>in</strong>quiry<br />

aim<strong>in</strong>g to account for <strong>the</strong> same reality described by<br />

science but by mov<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> conjectural ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than at <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> ‘verifiable’. More specifically,<br />

metaphysics is perhaps best understood as an attempt to<br />

provide general categories <strong>and</strong> concepts that transcend<br />

<strong>the</strong> empirical <strong>and</strong> yet f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir best application when <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are employed for <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g what science tells us. On this<br />

construal, certa<strong>in</strong>ly metaphysics should not be entirely a<br />

priori but – crucially – it does not reduce to science ei<strong>the</strong>r:<br />

what emerges is ra<strong>the</strong>r a two-way relationship of mutual<br />

support, accord<strong>in</strong>g to which metaphysics provides <strong>the</strong><br />

conceptual tools for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of science, <strong>and</strong><br />

science <strong>the</strong> data to make sense of our metaphysical<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>ses.<br />

The suggestions made <strong>in</strong> this paper, based on a<br />

prior def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>and</strong> defence of trope ontology <strong>and</strong> on a<br />

subsequent implementation of it on <strong>the</strong> basis of our best<br />

science, demonstrate that this underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between science <strong>and</strong> metaphysics may be<br />

fruitful.<br />

Properties <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> between Metaphysics <strong>and</strong> Physics — Matteo Morganti<br />

Literature<br />

Armstrong, David 1978 Universals <strong>and</strong> Scientific Realism, Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

Campbell, Keith 1990 Abstract Particulars, Oxford: Blackwell.<br />

Denkel, Arda 1997 “On <strong>the</strong> Compresence of Tropes”, <strong>Philosophy</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Phenomenological Research, 57, 599-606.<br />

Shimony, Abner 1981 “Critique of <strong>the</strong> Papers of F<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Suppes”,<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> of Science Association, II, 572-<br />

580.<br />

Simons, Peter 1994 “Particulars <strong>in</strong> Particular Cloth<strong>in</strong>g: Three Trope<br />

Theories of Substance”, <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Phenomenological Research,<br />

54, 553-575.<br />

Suarez, Mauricio 2007 “Quantum Propensities”, Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

History <strong>and</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> of Modern Physics, 38, 418-438.<br />

Williams, Donald 1953 “On <strong>the</strong> Elements of Be<strong>in</strong>g” (parts I <strong>and</strong> II),<br />

Review of Metaphysics, 7, 3-18 <strong>and</strong> 171-192.<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!