02.11.2012 Views

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mart<strong>in</strong> Pleitz”, e.g., is true at <strong>the</strong> unique po<strong>in</strong>t of personal<br />

space constituted by me. But proper names already<br />

presuppose <strong>the</strong> objects <strong>the</strong>y name. So, a hybrid logic of<br />

persons, when founded on natural language, cannot<br />

reduce persons.<br />

10. Logic <strong>and</strong> Metaphysical Commitment<br />

Today, modal logics generally are seen as tools not for <strong>the</strong><br />

decision of metaphysical questions, but to give an <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

characterization of given structures. In this “Amsterdam<br />

perspective” (Blackburn 2006, 330ff.), it is left entirely unspecified<br />

what <strong>the</strong>se structures are. It may <strong>the</strong>refore seem<br />

strange that <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g arguments about metric <strong>and</strong><br />

hybrid logic have led to <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g substantial metaphysical<br />

<strong>the</strong>ses:<br />

Instants, places <strong>and</strong> frames can be reduced to a perspectival<br />

metaphysics of space-time (by metric logic).<br />

Possible worlds can be reduced to maximally compatible<br />

propositions (by hybrid logic).<br />

Persons (<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r endur<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs) are <strong>the</strong> only<br />

genu<strong>in</strong>e objects we are left with.<br />

But <strong>the</strong>se metaphysical commitments do not rest on formal<br />

considerations alone, but on reasons concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> applicability<br />

of logical systems to our ord<strong>in</strong>ary use of natural<br />

language. The reasons for perspectivist spatiotemporal<br />

metaphysics lie <strong>in</strong> our practices of time-keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> referr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to places. The reason for l<strong>in</strong>guistic ersatzism about<br />

possible worlds is given by our practices of describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

possible situations. And <strong>the</strong> existence of persons <strong>and</strong><br />

th<strong>in</strong>gs is connected to <strong>the</strong> practice of nam<strong>in</strong>g. Only <strong>in</strong> cooperation<br />

with <strong>the</strong> philosophy of language can logic answer<br />

<strong>the</strong> question of what <strong>the</strong>re is.<br />

264<br />

The Metaphysical Relevance of Metric <strong>and</strong> Hybrid Logic — Mart<strong>in</strong> Pleitz<br />

Literature<br />

Blackburn, Patrick 2006 “Arthur Prior <strong>and</strong> Hybrid Logic”, Syn<strong>the</strong>se<br />

150, 329-372.<br />

Müller, Thomas 2002 Arthur Priors Zeitlogik, Paderborn: Mentis.<br />

Prior, Arthur N. 1957 Time <strong>and</strong> Modality, Oxford: Clarendon.<br />

Prior, Arthur N. 1967 Past, Present <strong>and</strong> Future, Oxford: Clarendon.<br />

Prior, Arthur N. 2003 Papers on Time <strong>and</strong> Tense. New Edition [eds.<br />

Per Hasle, Peter Øhrstrøm, Torben Braüner <strong>and</strong> Jack Copel<strong>and</strong>],<br />

Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Øhrstrøm, Peter, <strong>and</strong> Hasle, Per F.V. 1995 Temporal Logic,<br />

Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!