10.08.2013 Views

Template for PhD Dissertation - Forskning

Template for PhD Dissertation - Forskning

Template for PhD Dissertation - Forskning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mastodont som Dewey, der ellers mest interesserede sig <strong>for</strong> rationaliseringer, men i en<br />

tale på University of the State of New York i 1888 tog han bladet fra munden og<br />

sammenlignede the storage library med the recreation library. Her sagde han bl.a.:<br />

“The recreation type is a mental candy shop (...). It is wholly <strong>for</strong> use, but the<br />

use is wholly <strong>for</strong> amusement. It could be illustrated by a school that taught<br />

only games, or a hotel that in its dining-room served only sweetmeats. It<br />

has, to be sure, some excellent books, but supplied to meet the taste of its<br />

pleasure-seekers, as the confectioner gives those who wish it a bit of good<br />

bread to eat with their ice-cream.<br />

Surely every library ought to have an ambition to get and preserve books,<br />

and surely some place should be found in every general collection <strong>for</strong><br />

fiction and humour. These ought, however, to be the embroidery, and not<br />

the web. A circulating library, run as a business, will of course take on the<br />

latter character, and supply whatever will be most readily taken by its<br />

customers. But the library in which we are interested to-day combines the<br />

good features of both these with others of its own, and is the institution that<br />

deserves the name of people’s university. It might well copy that broad<br />

legend from the seal of Cornell, ‘An institution where any person may find<br />

instruction in any study.’ Perhaps we should more clearly recognise its<br />

proper functions and be in less danger of confusing it with old ideas if we<br />

called it not a ‘library,’ but a ‘people’s university.’” (Carrier, 1965, p. 90-<br />

91)<br />

Hver gang Dewey refererer til fiktion er ordvalget nedladende. Det er ’slik’, der bliver<br />

læst af <strong>for</strong>lystelsessyge mennesker, som bare vil underholdes, og ingen kan være i tvivl<br />

om, at Dewey ikke mener denne type litteratur har noget som helst at gøre med<br />

oplysning eller dannelse – ej heller, selv om nogle af titlerne åbenbart er ’fremragende’<br />

(hvad der til gengæld lyder meget lidt overbevisende i konteksten).<br />

Herover<strong>for</strong> var skaberen af et af de andre store klassifikationssystemer, Charles A.<br />

, afgjort mere positivt indstillet, men også <strong>for</strong> ham skulle læsningen af fiktion i<br />

Cutter 20<br />

20 Som Poole og Dewey blev også Cutter senere <strong>for</strong>mand <strong>for</strong> ALA.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!