25.06.2013 Views

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

204 8. Tests <strong>de</strong> copule gaussienne<br />

a large number of <strong>de</strong>grees of freedom, for a given value of the correl<strong>at</strong>ion coefficient? Formaly, <strong>de</strong>noting<br />

by Hν the hypothesis according to which the true copula of the d<strong>at</strong>a is the Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copula with ν <strong>de</strong>grees<br />

of freedom, we want to d<strong>et</strong>ermine the minimum significance level allowing us to distinguish b<strong>et</strong>ween H0<br />

and Hν.<br />

3.3.1 Importance of the distinction b<strong>et</strong>ween Gaussian and Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copulas<br />

This question has important practical implic<strong>at</strong>ions because, as discussed in section 2.4, the Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s<br />

copula presents a significant tail <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce while the Gaussian copula has no asymptotic tail <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce.<br />

Therefore, if our tests are unable to distinguish b<strong>et</strong>ween a Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s and a Gaussian copula,<br />

we may be led to choose the l<strong>at</strong>er for the sake of simplicity and parsimony and, as a consequence, we<br />

may un<strong>de</strong>restim<strong>at</strong>e severely the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce b<strong>et</strong>ween extreme events if the correct <strong>de</strong>scription turns out<br />

to be the Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copula. This may have c<strong>at</strong>astrophic consequences in risk assessment and portfolio<br />

management.<br />

Figure 1 provi<strong>de</strong>s a quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of the dangers incurred by mistaking a Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copula for a<br />

Gaussian one. Consi<strong>de</strong>r the case of a Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copula with ν = 20 <strong>de</strong>grees of freedom with a correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

coefficient ρ lower than 0.3 ∼ 0.4 ; its tail <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce λν(ρ) turns out to be less than 0.7%, i.e., the<br />

probability th<strong>at</strong> one variable becomes extreme knowing th<strong>at</strong> the other one is extreme is less than 0.7%.<br />

In this case. the Gaussian copula with zero probability of simultaneous extreme events is not a bad<br />

approxim<strong>at</strong>ion of the Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copula. In contrast, l<strong>et</strong> us take a correl<strong>at</strong>ion ρ larger than 0.7 − 0.8 for<br />

which the tail <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce becomes larger than 10%, corresponding to a non-negligible probability of<br />

simultaneous extreme events. The effect of tail <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce becomes of course much stronger as the<br />

number ν of <strong>de</strong>grees of freedom <strong>de</strong>creases.<br />

These examples stress the importance of knowing wh<strong>et</strong>her our testing procedure allows us to distinguish<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween a Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copula with ν = 20 (or less) <strong>de</strong>grees of freedom and a given correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

coefficient ρ = 0.5, for instance, and a Gaussian copula with an appropri<strong>at</strong>e correl<strong>at</strong>ion coefficient ρ ′ .<br />

3.3.2 St<strong>at</strong>istical test on the distinction b<strong>et</strong>ween Gaussian and Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s copulas<br />

To address this question, we have gener<strong>at</strong>ed 1,000 pairs of time series of size T = 1250, each pair of<br />

random variables following a Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s bivari<strong>at</strong>e distribution with ν <strong>de</strong>grees of freedom and a correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

coefficient ρ b<strong>et</strong>ween the two simultaneous variables of the same pair, while the variables along the time<br />

axis are all in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt. We have then applied the previous testing procedure to each of the pairs of time<br />

series.<br />

Specifically, for each pair of time series, we construct the marginals distributions and transform the<br />

Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s variables xi(k) into their Gaussian counterparts yi(k) via the transform<strong>at</strong>ion (23). For each<br />

pair (y1(k), y2(k)), k ∈ {1, · · · , T }, we estim<strong>at</strong>e its correl<strong>at</strong>ion m<strong>at</strong>rix, then construct the time series<br />

with T realiz<strong>at</strong>ions of the random variable z 2 (k) <strong>de</strong>fined in (27). The s<strong>et</strong> of T variables z 2 then allows<br />

us to construct the distribution of z 2 (with N = 2) and to compare it with the χ 2 -distribution with two<br />

<strong>de</strong>grees of freedom. We then measure the distances d1, d2, d3 and d4 <strong>de</strong>fined by (33-36) b<strong>et</strong>ween the<br />

distribution of z 2 and the χ 2 -distribution. Using the 1,000 pairs of such time series with the same ν<br />

and ρ, we then construct the distribution Di(di), i ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4} of each of these distances di. Using<br />

the previously d<strong>et</strong>ermined distribution of distances expected for the synth<strong>et</strong>ic Gaussian variables, we can<br />

transl<strong>at</strong>e each distance d obtained for the Stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s vectors into a corresponding Gaussian probability<br />

p: p is the probability th<strong>at</strong> pairs of Gaussian random variables with the correl<strong>at</strong>ion coefficient ρ have<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!