25.06.2013 Views

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

438 14. Gestion <strong>de</strong> Portefeuilles multimoments <strong>et</strong> équilibre <strong>de</strong> marché<br />

5.1 Equilibrium in a homogeneous mark<strong>et</strong><br />

The mark<strong>et</strong> is said to be homogeneous if all the agents acting on this mark<strong>et</strong> aim <strong>at</strong> fulfilling the same<br />

objective. This means th<strong>at</strong>:<br />

• H3-1: all the agents want to maximize the expected r<strong>et</strong>urn of their portfolio <strong>at</strong> the end of the period<br />

un<strong>de</strong>r a given constraint of measured risk, using the same measure of risks ρα for all of them.<br />

In the special case where ρα <strong>de</strong>notes the variance, all the agents follow a Markovitz’s optimiz<strong>at</strong>ion procedure,<br />

which leads to the CAPM equilibrium, as proved by (Sharpe 1964). When ρα represents the centered<br />

moments, we will be led to the mark<strong>et</strong> equilibrium <strong>de</strong>scribed by (Rubinstein 1973). Thus, this approach<br />

allows for a generaliz<strong>at</strong>ion of the most popular ass<strong>et</strong> pricing in equilibirum mark<strong>et</strong> mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

When all the agents have the same risk function ρα, wh<strong>at</strong>ever α may be, we can assert th<strong>at</strong> they have all a<br />

fraction of their capital invested in the same portfolio Π, whose composition is given in appendix B, and the<br />

remaining in the risk-free ass<strong>et</strong>. The amount of capital invested in the risky fund only <strong>de</strong>pends on their risk<br />

aversion or on the legal margin requirement they have to fulfil.<br />

L<strong>et</strong> us now assume th<strong>at</strong> the mark<strong>et</strong> is <strong>at</strong> equilibrium, i.e., supply equals <strong>de</strong>mand. In such a case, since the<br />

optimal portfolios can be any linear combin<strong>at</strong>ions of the risk-free ass<strong>et</strong> and of the risky portfolio Π, it is<br />

straightforward to show (see appendix C) th<strong>at</strong> the mark<strong>et</strong> portfolio, ma<strong>de</strong> of all tra<strong>de</strong>d ass<strong>et</strong>s in proportion<br />

of their mark<strong>et</strong> capitaliz<strong>at</strong>ion, is nothing but the risky portfolio Π. Thus, as shown in appendix D, we can<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong>, wh<strong>at</strong>ever the risk measure ρα chosen by the agents to perform their optimiz<strong>at</strong>ion, the excess r<strong>et</strong>urn<br />

of any ass<strong>et</strong> over the risk-free interest r<strong>at</strong>e is proportional to the excess r<strong>et</strong>urn of the mark<strong>et</strong> portfolio Π over<br />

the risk-free interest r<strong>at</strong>e:<br />

µ(i) − µ0 = β i α · (µΠ − µ0), (25)<br />

where<br />

β i α = ·<br />

<br />

∂ ln<br />

1<br />

ρα α<br />

∂wi<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

w ∗ 1 ,···,w ∗ N<br />

, (26)<br />

where w ∗ 1 , · · · , w∗ N are <strong>de</strong>fined in appendix D. When ρα <strong>de</strong>notes the variance, we recover the usual β i given<br />

by the mean-variance approach:<br />

β i = Cov(Xi, Π)<br />

. (27)<br />

Var(Π)<br />

Thus, the rel<strong>at</strong>ions (25) and (26) generalize the usual CAPM formula, showing th<strong>at</strong> the specific choice of<br />

the risk measure is not very important, as long as it follows the axioms I-IV characterizing the fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

of the distribution of ass<strong>et</strong> r<strong>et</strong>urns.<br />

5.2 Equilibrium in a h<strong>et</strong>erogeneous mark<strong>et</strong><br />

Does this result hold in the more realistic situ<strong>at</strong>ion of an h<strong>et</strong>erogeneous mark<strong>et</strong>? A mark<strong>et</strong> will be said to be<br />

h<strong>et</strong>erogeneous if the agents seek to fulfill different objectives. We thus consi<strong>de</strong>r the following assumption:<br />

• H3-2: There exists N agents. Each agent n is characterized by her choice of a risk measure ρα(n) so<br />

th<strong>at</strong> she invests only in the mean-ρα(n) efficient portfolios.<br />

According to this hypothesis, an agent n invests a fraction of her wealth in the risk-free ass<strong>et</strong> and the<br />

remaining in Πn, the mean-ρα(n) efficient portfolio, only ma<strong>de</strong> of risky ass<strong>et</strong>s. The fraction of wealth<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!