25.06.2013 Views

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 3. Distributions exponentielles étirées contre distributions régulièrement variables<br />

where L ′ (x) = ln(x) L(x). The lower panel of figure 10 shows the local in<strong>de</strong>x β(x) for a simul<strong>at</strong>ed Str<strong>et</strong>ched-<br />

Exponential distribution with c = 0.3. In this case, the local in<strong>de</strong>x β(x) continuously increases, which corresponds<br />

to our intuition th<strong>at</strong> an Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential behaves like a power-law with an always increasing<br />

exponent.<br />

Figure 11 shows the local in<strong>de</strong>x β(x) for a distribution constructed by joining two Par<strong>et</strong>o distributions with<br />

exponents b1 = 0.70 and b2 = 1.5 <strong>at</strong> the cross-over point u1 = 10. In this case, the local in<strong>de</strong>x β(x) again<br />

increases but not so quickly as in previous Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential case. Even for such large sample size<br />

(n = 15000), the “final” β(x) is about 1.3 which is still less than the true b-value for the second Par<strong>et</strong>o part<br />

(b = 1.5), showing the existence of strong cross-over effects. Such very strong cross-over effects occurring<br />

in the presence of a transition from a power law to another power law have already been noticed in (Sorn<strong>et</strong>te<br />

<strong>et</strong> al. 1996).<br />

Similarly to the local in<strong>de</strong>x β(x) based on the Par<strong>et</strong>o distribution taken as a reference, we <strong>de</strong>fine the notion<br />

of a local exponent c(x) taking Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential distributions as a reference. In<strong>de</strong>ed, given any<br />

sufficiently smooth positive function g(x), one can always find a function c(x) such th<strong>at</strong><br />

<br />

g(x) = exp 1 − x c(x)<br />

, x ≥ 1, (80)<br />

with c(x) = ln(1 − ln(g(x)))/ln(x). Obviously, for any Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential distribution with exponent c,<br />

the local exponent c(x) converges to c as x goes to infinity. This property is the same as for the local in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

β(x) which goes to the true tail in<strong>de</strong>x β for regularly varying distributions.<br />

Figure 12 shows the sample tail (continuous line), the local in<strong>de</strong>x β(x) (dashed line) and the local exponent<br />

c(x) (dash-dotted line) for the neg<strong>at</strong>ive tail of the Nasdaq five-minutes r<strong>et</strong>urns. The local exponent c(x)<br />

clearly reaches an asymptotic value ∼ = 0.32 for large enough values of the r<strong>et</strong>urns. In contrast, the local exponent<br />

β(x) remains continuously increasing. The lower panel shows in double logarithmic scale the local<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x β(x). Over a large range, β(x) increases approxim<strong>at</strong>ely a power law of in<strong>de</strong>x 0.77 while beyond the<br />

quantile 99% (see the ins<strong>et</strong>) it behaves like a power law with smaller in<strong>de</strong>x equal to 0.54 implying a <strong>de</strong>celer<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

growth. The goodness of fit of the regression of lnβ(x) on lnx has been qualified by a χ 2 test which<br />

does not allow to reject this mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>at</strong> any usual confi<strong>de</strong>nce level. Note th<strong>at</strong> a power law <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of the<br />

local Par<strong>et</strong>o exponent β(x) as a function of x qualifies a Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential distribution, according to (78)<br />

and (79). The second regime fitted with the exponent c = 0.54 seems still perturbed by a cross-over effect<br />

as it does not r<strong>et</strong>rieve the value c ∼ = 0.32 which characterizes the tail of the distributions of r<strong>et</strong>urns according<br />

to the Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential mo<strong>de</strong>l. These fits quantifying the growth of the local Par<strong>et</strong>o exponent are not<br />

in contradiction with figure 7 and expression (33). In<strong>de</strong>ed, a <strong>de</strong>creasing positive exponent is an altern<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

<strong>de</strong>scription for a logarithmic growth and vice-versa. These fits provi<strong>de</strong> an improved quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of the<br />

previously rough characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion of the growth of the exponent estim<strong>at</strong>ed per quantile shown with 7 and<br />

expression (33) but using a b<strong>et</strong>ter characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion of the “local” exponent.<br />

The positive tail of the Nasdaq and both tails of the Dow Jones exhibit exactly the same continuously increasing<br />

behaviour with the same characteristics and we are not showing them. Taken tog<strong>et</strong>her, these oberv<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

suggest th<strong>at</strong> the Str<strong>et</strong>ched-Exponential represent<strong>at</strong>ion provi<strong>de</strong>s a b<strong>et</strong>ter mo<strong>de</strong>l of the tail behavior of large<br />

r<strong>et</strong>urns than does a regularly varying distribution.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!