25.06.2013 Views

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

statistique, théorie et gestion de portefeuille - Docs at ISFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

410 13. Gestion <strong>de</strong> <strong>portefeuille</strong> sous contraintes <strong>de</strong> capital économique<br />

and<br />

e −x ∗ x∗ i<br />

i +h i<br />

dtt<br />

x ∗ i<br />

du |f ′′ (u)−f ′′ (x ∗ i )| ≤ e −x ∗<br />

x ∗ i<br />

i +h i<br />

since wh<strong>at</strong>ever the sign of hi, the quantity x ∗ i +hi<br />

x ∗ i<br />

dtt<br />

x ∗ i<br />

du [f ′′ (u)−f ′′ (x∗ i )] ≤ ex ∗ i +hi x∗ i<br />

dt t<br />

x∗ du |f<br />

i<br />

′′ (u) − f ′′ (x∗ i<br />

dtt<br />

x∗ du |f<br />

i<br />

′′ (u)−f ′′ (x∗ i )| ,<br />

(117)<br />

)| remains always positive.<br />

But, |u − x∗ i | ≤ |hi| ≤ C<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i ), which leads, by the mean value theorem and assumption 1, to<br />

which yields<br />

Thus<br />

|f ′′ (u) − f ′′ (x ∗ i )| ≤ sup<br />

ξ∈(x∗ i ,x∗ i +hi)<br />

|f (3) (ξ)| · |u − x ∗ i |, (118)<br />

0 ≤ <br />

1<br />

− 2i<br />

e sup |f (3) (ξ)|<br />

i<br />

≤ sup<br />

ξ∈(x∗ i ,x∗ i +hi)<br />

|f (3) (ξ)| C<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i ),<br />

≤ sup |f<br />

ξ∈Gi<br />

(3) (ξ)| C<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i ), where Gi =<br />

x ∗<br />

i +hi<br />

x ∗ i<br />

t<br />

dt<br />

x∗ du |f<br />

i<br />

′′ (u) − f ′′ (x ∗ i )| ≤ 1 <br />

2<br />

i<br />

C<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i ) h2 i<br />

≤ e −x ∗ i +hi x∗ i<br />

dtt<br />

x ∗ i<br />

(119)<br />

<br />

x ∗ i − C<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i ), x∗i + C<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i )<br />

<br />

, (120)<br />

sup<br />

ξ∈Gi<br />

|f (3) (ξ)|<br />

du [f ′′ (u)−f ′′ (x∗ i )] 1<br />

2i<br />

≤ e<br />

sup |f (3) (ξ)|<br />

C<br />

f ′′ (x ∗ i )h2 i . (121)<br />

C<br />

f ′′ (x ∗ i ) h2 i , (122)<br />

where sup ξ∈Gi |f (3) (ξ)|, have been <strong>de</strong>noted by sup |f (3) (ξ)| in the previous expression, in or<strong>de</strong>r not to<br />

cumber the not<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

By proposition 4, we know th<strong>at</strong> for all h ∈ AC and all ɛi > 0<br />

<br />

<br />

sup<br />

|f<br />

<br />

<br />

(3) (ξ)<br />

f ′′ (x∗ i )<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

≤ ɛi, for x ∗ i large enough, (123)<br />

so th<strong>at</strong><br />

∀ɛ ′ C·ɛ′<br />

i −<br />

> 0 and ∀h ∈ AC, e 2 h2 i ≤ e −x ∗ x∗ i<br />

for |x| large enough.<br />

i +h i<br />

Moreover, from proposition 3, we have for all ɛi > 0 and x∗ i large enough:<br />

so, for all ɛ ′′ > 0<br />

dtt<br />

x∗ du [f<br />

i<br />

′′ (u)−f ′′ (x∗ i )] ≤ e C·ɛ′<br />

i 2 h2 i , (124)<br />

∀h ∈ AC, (1 − ɛi) ν ≤ g(x∗i + hi)<br />

g(x∗ i ) ≤ (1 + ɛi) ν , (125)<br />

∀h ∈ AC, (1 − ɛ ′′ ) Nν ≤ <br />

Then for all ɛ > 0 and |x| large enough, this yields :<br />

i<br />

g(x ∗ i<br />

+ hi)<br />

g(x∗ i ) ≤ (1 + ɛ′′ ) Nν . (126)<br />

(1 − ɛ) Nν 1<br />

−<br />

e 2i (f ′′ (x∗ i )+C·ɛ)·h2 i ≤ g(xi)<br />

g(x∗ i )e−f(xi) Nν −<br />

≤ (1 + ɛ) e 1<br />

2i (f ′′ (x∗ i )−C·ɛ)·h2 i , (127)<br />

i<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!