12.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

122Security <strong>of</strong> tenureUrban tenureinsecurity, by region(percentage)Source: Flood, 2001Urban spatial growth… have resulted in… displacement <strong>of</strong>farmers, illegal landseizures and growingtenure insecuritylevel, <strong>the</strong> pattern is <strong>the</strong> same, with between 40 and 70 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> Brazil’s main cities living in irregularsettlements and some 58 per cent <strong>of</strong> all households inSouth Africa living without security <strong>of</strong> tenure. 20The situation in Cambodia deserves some specialattention since everyone who returned to Phnom Penh after<strong>the</strong> collapse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Khmer Rouge regime was a squatter:In 1979, when people first began to emergefrom <strong>the</strong> jungle into an empty, dilapidated city,<strong>the</strong>y camped out in empty buildings and lit openfires to cook <strong>the</strong>ir rice. When all <strong>the</strong> houses andflats had been occupied, newcomers builtshelters wherever <strong>the</strong>y could find space, alongriver banks and railway tracks, on streets, in <strong>the</strong>areas between buildings and on ro<strong>of</strong>tops. 21To formalize this situation and provide <strong>the</strong> residents withsecurity <strong>of</strong> tenure, a new Land <strong>Law</strong> was adopted in 1992 andBox 5.6 When is tenure secure? The eviction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Group 78 community in Phnom Penh, CambodiaResidents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group 78 community in Phnom Penh had been living in <strong>the</strong> same locationsince <strong>the</strong> mid 1980s and had pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir continuous ‘peaceful and uncontested possession’ <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> land, as specified in Article 30 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1991 Land <strong>Law</strong>. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> residents had documentsissued by <strong>the</strong> local authorities recognizing <strong>the</strong>ir legal occupation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> land. They thus clearlymet <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Land <strong>Law</strong>.Yet, when <strong>the</strong>y applied for formal title to <strong>the</strong> land in2004, <strong>the</strong>ir applications were refused. They thus lodged <strong>the</strong>ir case to <strong>the</strong> National CadastralCommission and <strong>the</strong> National Authority on Land Dispute Resolution. The verdict was negative.Their application was refused as <strong>the</strong>ir land was needed to ‘contribute to city beautification anddevelopment’. The Group 78 residents were informed by <strong>the</strong> local authorities in June 2006 that<strong>the</strong>y would have to move to a resettlement area on <strong>the</strong> outskirts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city.While <strong>the</strong> Land <strong>Law</strong> does provide for expropriation <strong>of</strong> land for <strong>the</strong> public interest,‘it isdoubtful whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> purported reason <strong>of</strong> “beautification” could fulfil this requirement. Ifacceptable, such vague wording would render <strong>the</strong> public interest test meaningless.’ A morelikely explanation may have been that <strong>the</strong> evictions were related to <strong>the</strong> increasing value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irland. With land prices soaring, increasing sevenfold since <strong>the</strong> year 2000, <strong>the</strong> potential forcorruption is considerable. The US ambassador to Cambodia made <strong>the</strong> following observations:There’s too many land disputes, too many rich people, greedy companies. Property isreally <strong>the</strong> key to prosperity and freedom and once people are not secure in what <strong>the</strong>yown, everything else falls apart… Corruption is central to everything, at all levels. Idon’t know <strong>of</strong> any case <strong>of</strong> where a corrupt <strong>of</strong>ficial has really gone to gaol here –certainly not from <strong>the</strong> ruling party.Source: ABC TV, 2006; Bristol, 2007aSquatters (no rent) Renters O<strong>the</strong>r TotalSou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa 8 16 6 29Rest <strong>of</strong> Africa 13 30 7 50China 5 2 8 15East Asia and Pacific, excluding Australasia 7 26 9 41South and Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia 14 31 5 50Middle East 8 28 6 42Western Europe 2 19 4 25North America and Australasia 1 10 4 16Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean 11 17 6 34World 7 17 4 28revised in 2001. As a result, any person who had enjoyedpeaceful, uncontested possession <strong>of</strong> land for no less than fiveyears prior to <strong>the</strong> promulgation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> law had <strong>the</strong> right torequest a definitive title <strong>of</strong> ownership. 22Having <strong>the</strong> right to request a definitive title andactually getting title are, however, two quite different things.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, many residents – particularly <strong>the</strong> poor – mayqualify for title under <strong>the</strong> law but are unaware both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irstatus and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> procedures for requesting title. Whilevarious organizations have been working to increase thatawareness, <strong>the</strong>y do not have <strong>the</strong> resources to reach all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>country’s families facing eviction. Even for those who areaware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rights to possession and who can make aclaim, <strong>the</strong>re are fur<strong>the</strong>r obstructions: ‘Corruption has alsomade land titles difficult to obtain; an application for a landtitle can cost from US$200 to $700 in informal payments togovernment <strong>of</strong>ficials, a cost that is prohibitive for many.’ 23And <strong>the</strong>n, even where people are aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rights, havemade <strong>the</strong>ir claim and have received <strong>of</strong>ficial documents tothis effect, this does not mean that <strong>the</strong>y have any security <strong>of</strong>tenure. A half-hour television documentary broadcast inAustralia in October 2006 exemplified <strong>the</strong> insecurity facedby many urban residents in Cambodia (see Box 5.6).In much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> developing world, it is not solely citiesthat are host to households without security <strong>of</strong> tenure. Inrural areas, agricultural land provides <strong>the</strong> sole basis <strong>of</strong>income for more than half a billion people. About half <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se suffer some form <strong>of</strong> serious tenure insecurity due to<strong>the</strong>ir status <strong>of</strong> tenant farmers, because <strong>the</strong>y are landless, ordue to incomplete and dysfunctional land administrationsystems not suited to <strong>the</strong> prevailing circumstances. 24 Inaddition, rapid economic development – leading to urbanspatial growth – in countries such as China (see Box 5.7) andIndia have resulted in massive losses <strong>of</strong> farmland and <strong>the</strong>subsequent displacement <strong>of</strong> farmers, illegal land seizuresand growing tenure insecurity. With particular regard toChina, from <strong>the</strong> mid 1980s onward, large swa<strong>the</strong>s <strong>of</strong> ruralland near cities and towns have effectively entered <strong>the</strong> urbanland market, threatening security <strong>of</strong> tenure to land andhousing. 25 Between 1986 and 1996, 31 cities in Chinaexpanded <strong>the</strong>ir land area by some 50 per cent, most <strong>of</strong> thisformer farmland.Security <strong>of</strong> tenure problems are by no means isolatedto <strong>the</strong> developing world, and while <strong>the</strong>y may manifest infundamentally different ways, declines in security <strong>of</strong> tenureare visible in many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wealthier countries (see Box 5.8).In <strong>the</strong> UK, for instance, fewer and fewer people are able toaccess <strong>the</strong> property market due to rising costs and continuingdeclines in buyer affordability. 26 In <strong>the</strong> US, millions <strong>of</strong>tenants do not have adequate levels <strong>of</strong> secure tenureprotecting <strong>the</strong>m from possible eviction. Moreover, peoplefacing eviction in <strong>the</strong> US do not have a right to counsel; as aresult, <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> evictions in <strong>the</strong> US is far higher than itwould be if tenants were provided legal representation ineviction proceedings. 27 According to <strong>of</strong>ficial figures, some25,000 evictions are carried out annually in New York Cityalone. 28 The Economist publishes annual figures outlininghousing price developments in a range <strong>of</strong> countries, indicating<strong>the</strong> upward trend over <strong>the</strong> past 15 years which, although

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!