12.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vulnerability, risk and resilience: Towards a conceptual framework35be ‘gendered victims’, such as women and girls. O<strong>the</strong>r kinds<strong>of</strong> generic victims exist in cities – for example, streetchildren who may be abused, maimed and even killed bypublic authorities to rid <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> so-called nuisances, or byprivate individuals or gangs who assume that attacking streetchildren can be done with impunity. If <strong>the</strong>se victims arevulnerable to crime and violence, <strong>the</strong>y are also vulnerable t<strong>of</strong>orced evictions and are likely to be <strong>the</strong> least protectedduring natural disasters. These individuals are, <strong>the</strong>refore,likely to be cumulatively vulnerable to risks and hazards.FORMS OFINTERDEPENDENCEThe above analysis demonstrates that urban safety andsecurity are dependent upon complicated patterns <strong>of</strong>cumulative causation and multiple impacts. An added dimensionto this complexity is a pattern <strong>of</strong> interdependence, aswell. Distinct spheres <strong>of</strong> action – social, economic andenvironmental – interact in ways that demonstrate <strong>the</strong> highdegree <strong>of</strong> interdependence among <strong>the</strong>m. Indeed, it is <strong>the</strong>semyriad forms <strong>of</strong> interdependence which form a central part<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument about various forms <strong>of</strong> resilience andsustainability. 49So far, examples in which social, economic or spatialoutcomes have depended upon multiple factors have beenpresented. These factors have been described as contributingto cumulative causation. The chains <strong>of</strong> causation,however, do not move only in one direction. For example,<strong>the</strong> high crime in Mexico City may be, in part, a result <strong>of</strong>macro-economic changes affecting <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> employment.But high crime, as suggested earlier, also has asignificant cost for <strong>the</strong> macro-economy and contributes tolow levels <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment or tourism. Highcrime at <strong>the</strong> community level can also reduce <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong>savings or asset accumulation <strong>of</strong> households who have beenrobbed. As a result, <strong>the</strong>y are unable to invest in improving<strong>the</strong>ir homes. Therefore, even though <strong>the</strong>ir investment ismodest, <strong>the</strong>ir victimization by crime has inhibited economicmultipliers within <strong>the</strong>ir community. This micro-example isrepeated many times over in countries such as Colombia orEl Salvador, where households may be wary to reveal anywealth for fear <strong>of</strong> robbery. The causes <strong>of</strong> insecurity, <strong>the</strong>refore,may come from different origins.The complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se patterns <strong>of</strong> causationsuggests that simple explanations or single-issue recommendationsto improve urban safety and security are likely to be<strong>of</strong> limited value. This observation sets up <strong>the</strong> normativeframework in <strong>the</strong> following section.PATHWAYS TO RESILIENCEPrevious sections <strong>of</strong> this chapter have proposed a conceptualframework for understanding <strong>the</strong> origins, causation andimpacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three threats to urban safety and securityaddressed in this report: crime and violence, insecurity <strong>of</strong>tenure, and disasters. Risk factors underlying <strong>the</strong>se threatshave also been discussed at different geographical andanalytical levels. This discussion has demonstrated thatsingle-cause explanations are insufficient representations <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se phenomena. In normative terms,three arenas have been identified that have <strong>the</strong> potential toremedy some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worst impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se problems: institutionsand policy, <strong>the</strong> juridical framework <strong>of</strong> internationallaw, and civil society and culture.While each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se arenas will be presented in detailin subsequent chapters <strong>of</strong> this report in relation to each <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> three threats to urban safety and security, <strong>the</strong> followingsub-sections suggest that, individually and toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>arenas <strong>of</strong>fer alternative and complementary pathways to <strong>the</strong>resilience required to alleviate some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worst impacts <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se problems. For <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this chapter, as notedearlier, resilience is defined as <strong>the</strong> capacity to adjust tothreats, to mitigate or avoid harm, and to bounce back fromshocks.Institutions and policyAs suggested in previous sections <strong>of</strong> this Global Report, onedimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban safety and security challenges requiringdirect attention is <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> institutions. Examples havebeen provided showing how various factors at <strong>the</strong> global andnational levels have affected national institutions and, inturn, <strong>the</strong>ir influence on <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> urban and communityinstitutions to respond to <strong>the</strong>se challenges. While it isrelatively easy to identify and document <strong>the</strong>se institutionalimpacts, it is much harder to improve institutional performanceon managing, for example, crime and violence in <strong>the</strong>short, medium and even <strong>the</strong> long term. Indeed, <strong>the</strong>weakness <strong>of</strong> urban institutions is itself a vulnerability thatallows <strong>the</strong>se threats to security to be so heavy in <strong>the</strong>ir socialand economic impacts in <strong>the</strong> first place.As noted above, <strong>the</strong> term ‘institution’ refers to anystructured pattern <strong>of</strong> behaviour, including ‘informal’ institutionsor behaviours, that communities and households mayuse to maintain <strong>the</strong>ir equilibrium in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> dynamicconditions such as crime and violence or disasters. The valueand utility <strong>of</strong> this sociological definition <strong>of</strong> ‘institution’ isillustrated in <strong>the</strong> following examples. Recent experienceshave demonstrated that in disasters in many countries, suchas after earthquakes in Surat in India and Bursa in Turkey, orin recovery from tsunami-affected areas in India or Sri Lanka,women’s groups are usually <strong>the</strong> best informed about communityconditions and about <strong>the</strong> mapping <strong>of</strong> facilities,households and community hazards. 50 It should not besurprising that <strong>the</strong>y also are effective in determining <strong>the</strong>priorities for relief and recovery, as international aid organizationshave now come to recognize and appreciate.The issue <strong>of</strong> information is critical in this context:normally male-dominated public institutions seek to controlinformation before and after disasters, using such events asopportunities to assert power or to have a privileged claimon <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> new resources destined for relief and recovery.Women’s groups as informal institutions, <strong>the</strong>refore,should be central to any mapping <strong>of</strong> institutional actorsinvolved in maintaining urban safety and security. The importance<strong>of</strong> gender in this regard directly contradicts what isThe complexity<strong>of</strong> … patterns <strong>of</strong>causation suggeststhat simpleexplanations orsingle-issuerecommendations toimprove urbansafety and securityare likely to be <strong>of</strong>limited valueResilience is … <strong>the</strong>capacity to adjust tothreats, to mitigateor avoid harm, andto bounce back fromshocks

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!