12.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Disaster risk: Conditions, trends and impacts169Rio de Janeiro might be considered a small event by urbanauthorities; but <strong>the</strong> same event in <strong>the</strong> much smaller city <strong>of</strong>Castries, Saint Lucia, may well be considered <strong>of</strong> nationalsignificance. Table 7.1 outlines those characteristics that canbe used more objectively to identify similarities and differencesbetween small and large disasters.Human vulnerability also plays a large role in determining<strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> disaster. Small hazard events can beturned into large disasters where high vulnerability meansmany people are at risk, emergency response is inadequateand critical infrastructure is fragile. Where vulnerability islow, emergency services are adequate and critical infrastructureis resilient, large disasters can be avoided even fromlarge hazards.Successive disasters can reduce <strong>the</strong> resilience <strong>of</strong>people or households to subsequent shocks and stresses.Small disasters can pave <strong>the</strong> way for large events by erodingpeople’s assets and <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> critical infrastructure,progressively lowering society’s thresholds <strong>of</strong> resilience. 2Large events that damage critical infrastructure or urbaneconomies will similarly undermine <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> individualsor emergency services to resist eveneveryday hazards, potentially making small disasters morefrequent.Everyday hazards may be hard to avoid for those atrisk and, indeed, become an intrinsic part <strong>of</strong> livelihood andsurvival strategies. In this way, everyday hazards and smalldisaster losses can mistakenly become accepted as anexpected part <strong>of</strong> life. In turn, this can have <strong>the</strong> perverseeffect <strong>of</strong> lowering <strong>the</strong> willingness <strong>of</strong> individuals at risk ordevelopment agencies to invest in risk reduction, 3 thuscreating a vicious circle where poverty and marginalizationcoincide with disaster risk.Everyday hazards and small disasters differ from largedisasters in that <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong>ten seen as a problem <strong>of</strong> technologicalefficiency and infrastructure management – in o<strong>the</strong>rwords, as problems <strong>of</strong> development. This has two consequences.First, everyday hazards tend to be managed byspecialists from diverse fields, including engineering,medicine, land-use planning and chemistry, makingintegrated risk reduction more difficult. Secondly, socialdimensions are easily overlooked by technological pr<strong>of</strong>essionsand planning agencies that dominate <strong>the</strong>se areas <strong>of</strong>work.Episodic hazards and large disasters pose an evengreater challenge to sustainable urbanization. This isbecause <strong>the</strong>y are too <strong>of</strong>ten seen not as problems <strong>of</strong> development,but as problems for development. Predominantstrategies for dealing with risk and loss from large disastersfocus on emergency response and reconstruction – not inaddressing underlying failures in development that lead tohuman vulnerability. The risk reduction approach taken bythis Global Report calls for small and large disasters to beseen as problems <strong>of</strong> development, requiring changes indevelopment paths as well as in disaster response and reconstructionto build resilient human settlements.Small disastersURBANIZATION ANDDISASTER RISKLarge disastersScale <strong>of</strong> risk Individuals and small groups Communities, city regions, cities, globalSystems at risk Individual health and livelihoods, Social stability, critical infrastructure, urbansubcomponents <strong>of</strong> critical infrastructure, economies, ecosystem serviceslocal economic or ecological systemsExamples <strong>of</strong> associated Localized hazard events such as tidal Widespread hazard events such as a severetrigger hazard flooding or irresponsible driving earthquake or major release <strong>of</strong> toxic chemicalsFrequency <strong>of</strong> hazard event High (‘every day’) Low (‘episodic’)Strategic importance to Aggregate loss high Huge loss from individual eventsdevelopment planningData sources Emergency services, local news media National and international emergency reliefagencies and news mediaDominant actors in Family, neighbours, emergency services Family, neighbours, emergency services, militaryresponseor civil defence, national and internationalhumanitarian actorsThe last decade has seen an unprecedented number <strong>of</strong> disasterevents unfold worldwide. The global incidence andimpacts <strong>of</strong> disasters from 1996 onwards illustrates extensivedamage both in terms <strong>of</strong> mortality and economic losses (seeTable 7.2). 4 Transport accidents 5 and floods were <strong>the</strong> mostfrequently reported disasters. Impacts were highest fornatural disasters, with earthquakes and tsunamis being <strong>the</strong>deadliest. Floods and windstorms accounted for <strong>the</strong> greatestnumber <strong>of</strong> disaster events and also affected <strong>the</strong> greatestnumber <strong>of</strong> people. Windstorms were most costly comparedto o<strong>the</strong>r disaster types. Even with a time span <strong>of</strong> ten years,comparing <strong>the</strong> frequency and impacts <strong>of</strong> disaster types canbe problematic. Large infrequent events, such as <strong>the</strong> IndianOcean Tsunami, or individual flood or earthquake events candistort aggregate measurements <strong>of</strong> impacts associated wi<strong>the</strong>ach hazard and disaster type. Far longer time spans wouldbe needed to capture infrequent disaster types. However,longer time spans would subject disaster impact data to <strong>the</strong>effects <strong>of</strong> changing underlying human developmentcontexts, including urbanization.In <strong>the</strong> new urban millennium, natural and humanmadedisasters are likely to have <strong>the</strong>ir greatest impact incities where half <strong>of</strong> humanity is expected to reside. Theworld will become predominantly urban, with <strong>the</strong> totalurban population expected to reach 5 billion by 2030, whilerural populations will begin to contract from 2015 onwards. 6The location <strong>of</strong> major urban centres in coastal areas exposedto hydro-meteorological hazards and in geologically activezones is an additional risk factor. The concentration <strong>of</strong>Table 7.1Small and large disastersIn <strong>the</strong> new urbanmillennium, naturaland human-madedisasters are likelyto have <strong>the</strong>ir greatestimpact incities…Table 7.2Global extent andimpacts <strong>of</strong> disasters byhazard type (total1996–2005)Source: EM-DAT, CREDdatabase, University <strong>of</strong>Louvain, Belgium, www.emdat.netNumber <strong>of</strong> Mortality People Economic damageevents affected (US$ millions, 2005 prices)Avalanches/landslides 191 7864 1801 1382Earthquakes, tsunamis 297 391,610 41,562 113,181Extreme temperatures 168 60,249 5703 16,197Floods 1310 90,237 1,292,989 208,434Volcanic eruptions 50 262 940 59Windstorms 917 62,410 326,252 319,208Industrial accidents 505 13,962 1372 13,879Miscellaneous accidents 461 15,757 400 2541Transport accidents 2035 69,636 89 960

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!