12.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Security <strong>of</strong> tenure: Conditions and trends125Region Persons evicted Persons evicted Persons evicted Total1998–2000 2001–2002 2003–2006 1998–2006Africa 1,607,435 4,086,971 1,967,486 7,661,892Europe 23,728 172,429 16,266 212,423The Americas 135,569 692,390 152,949 980,908Asia and <strong>the</strong> Pacific 2,529,246 1,787,097 2,140,906 6,457,249Total 4,294,978 6,738,887 4,277,607 15,311,472Table 5.5Estimated number <strong>of</strong>people subjected t<strong>of</strong>orced evictions byregionSource: COHRE, 2002, 2003,2006Notes: The data presented in this table is based on information received by <strong>the</strong> Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) directly from affected persons and groups andwhere <strong>the</strong> cases at hand are particularly noteworthy. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> data is collected from some 60 to 70 countries only (although <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries amounts to some80 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total world population). The data is thus not comprehensive in terms <strong>of</strong> representing <strong>the</strong> global scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> forced eviction. Without a doubt, <strong>the</strong>actual number <strong>of</strong> forced evictions is considerably higher than what is indicated in <strong>the</strong> table.• In Sudan, more than 12,000 people were forciblyevicted from Dar Assalaam camp in August 2006. Themajority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evictees had been previously displacedthrough conflict in Sudan and settled in camps in oraround <strong>the</strong> capital, Khartoum. Authorities have forciblyevicted thousands <strong>of</strong> people from <strong>the</strong>se camps, resettling<strong>the</strong>m in desert areas without access to clean water,food and o<strong>the</strong>r essentials. Currently, <strong>the</strong>re are about 1.8million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in andaround Khartoum. 34• In Luanda, <strong>the</strong> capital <strong>of</strong> Angola, at least 6000 familieshave been forcibly evicted and have had <strong>the</strong>ir homesdemolished since 2001. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se families, whohave received no compensation, have had <strong>the</strong>ir propertystolen by those carrying out <strong>the</strong> forced evictions andremain homeless.• In Equatorial Guinea, at least 650 families have beenforcibly evicted from <strong>the</strong>ir homes since 2004, when <strong>the</strong>government embarked on a programme <strong>of</strong> urban regenerationin Malabo and Bata. What is even moredisturbing is that <strong>the</strong>se families had title to <strong>the</strong>irproperty. Thousands more residents are threatened byforced evictions.• In Kenya, at least 20,000 people have been forciblyevicted from neighbourhoods in or around Nairobi since2000.• In Ghana, some 800 people also had <strong>the</strong>ir homesdestroyed in Legion Village, Accra, in May 2006, whileapproximately 30,000 people in <strong>the</strong> Agbogbloshiecommunity <strong>of</strong> Accra have been threatened with forcedeviction since 2002.Not all news about evictions in Africa is bad, however.Indeed, <strong>the</strong>re is evidence <strong>of</strong> a growing movement in Africaopposing evictions. In some instances, support in this regardhas come from one <strong>of</strong> Africa’s most important human rightsinstitutions, <strong>the</strong> African Commission on Human and PeoplesRights, which broke new ground when it held that Nigeria’s:…obligations to protect obliges it to prevent <strong>the</strong>violation <strong>of</strong> any individual’s right to housing byany o<strong>the</strong>r individual or non-state actors likelandlords, property developers, and landowners, and where such infringements occur, itshould act to preclude fur<strong>the</strong>r deprivations aswell as guaranteeing access to legal remedies.The right to shelter even goes fur<strong>the</strong>r than aro<strong>of</strong> over one’s head. It extends to embody <strong>the</strong>individual’s right to be let alone and to live inpeace – whe<strong>the</strong>r under a ro<strong>of</strong> or not. 35This juxtaposition, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large-scale global reality <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>tenviolent, illegal and arbitrary forced evictions, on <strong>the</strong> onehand, and <strong>the</strong> increasingly strong pro-human rights positionstaken against <strong>the</strong> practice, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, captures <strong>the</strong>essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ongoing struggle between those favouringgood governance, respect for <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> law and <strong>the</strong> primacy<strong>of</strong> human rights, and those supporting more top-down,authoritarian and less democratic approaches to governanceand economic decision-making. Efforts to combine bestpractices on <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> security <strong>of</strong> tenure with <strong>the</strong>Box 5.9 Forced evictions: A sample <strong>of</strong> cases from NigeriaForced evictions hasreached epidemicproportions inAfricaDuring <strong>the</strong> last two decades it appears as if forced evictions have been extensively used inNigeria as a ‘tool <strong>of</strong> urban engineering’ in a (largely counterproductive) effort to eliminate <strong>the</strong>growth <strong>of</strong> slums. Poverty and lack <strong>of</strong> basic services and amenities have been cited as justificationfor <strong>the</strong> demolition <strong>of</strong> entire communities:• When <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Lagos State in July 1990 demolished <strong>the</strong> homes <strong>of</strong> over 300,000Maroko residents, it claimed that <strong>the</strong> community was prone to flooding and ‘unfit forhuman habitation’.• When <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Rivers State forcibly evicted over 1 million Rainbow Townresidents in 2001, it claimed that <strong>the</strong> community harboured too many criminals.• When <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Lagos State forcibly evicted and burned <strong>the</strong> homes <strong>of</strong> over 3000Makoko residents in April 2005, it claimed that it was helping some private citizens t<strong>of</strong>lush out undesirable squatters.• The forced eviction <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> residents in Abuja by <strong>the</strong> Federal Capital CityDevelopment Authority has been presented as an effort to correct distortions to <strong>the</strong>Abuja Master Plan.• The Lagos State government’s persistent efforts to forcibly evict <strong>the</strong> Ijora-Badia communityhave been explained by <strong>the</strong> need to rid <strong>the</strong> community <strong>of</strong> filth, flooding andprostitution (see Box 6.21).Additional recent cases <strong>of</strong> forced evictions have been reported from:• Aboru Abesan, in Ikeja (Lagos State), where at least 6000 residents were renderedhomeless when <strong>the</strong>ir homes were demolished by <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong>Housing and Urban Development in January 2005;• Agip Waterside Community in Port Harcourt, where 5000 to 10,000 people wererendered homeless between February and April 2005 when <strong>the</strong> Rivers State governmentdemolished <strong>the</strong>ir homes.Source: COHRE, 2006, p26; Morka, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!