28.02.2018 Views

Revitalization of Rivers in India Draft Policy - Isha Guru Jaggi Vasudev

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Revitalization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rivers</strong> In <strong>India</strong><br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> Recommendation<br />

generated <strong>in</strong> the economy would be Rs. 17,424 crore (0.91 percent) by Rs.<br />

10,000 crore <strong>of</strong> additional <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> construction. Direct employment<br />

<strong>in</strong> the construction sector would grow by 22.74 percent. Sectors such<br />

as coal tar products, cement, electricity, gas and water supply would<br />

experience a higher growth <strong>of</strong> employment than the construction sector.<br />

Total employment <strong>in</strong> economy would <strong>in</strong>crease nearly by 4 percent.<br />

Household <strong>in</strong>come would <strong>in</strong>crease by Rs. 16,267 crore. All household<br />

categories would augment their <strong>in</strong>come. Aggregate private <strong>in</strong>come would<br />

grow by 0.76 percent.<br />

THE CASE FOR A CAUTIONARY APPROACH<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>st the economic rationale proposed for the project; there are<br />

strong economic arguments, bio-physical and climate science arguments,<br />

and ecological arguments 53 that advise us to exercise abundant caution<br />

when consider<strong>in</strong>g such a large-scale eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> our water resources.<br />

ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS<br />

The <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> rivers idea is based on the fact that there are<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong> which have surplus water and parts that are deficit, and so<br />

water must be transferred from surplus to deficit regions so every region<br />

has the amount <strong>of</strong> water needed to support its population. However,<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> “surplus” and “deficit” has been questioned, s<strong>in</strong>ce it<br />

does not relate to consumption but economic activity. The transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

water across geographies is ma<strong>in</strong>ly supposed to stimulate economic<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> agriculture, <strong>in</strong>dustry and services. But natural endowments<br />

have always been different and so have the economic activities around<br />

them. In an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly connected world, we are no longer dependent on<br />

food or <strong>in</strong>dustrial products produced locally. If all food is grown <strong>in</strong> a few<br />

“agricultural breadbaskets”, an urban region, which uses water mostly<br />

for domestic purposes, does not need the same amount <strong>of</strong> water as a<br />

rice-grow<strong>in</strong>g belt that feeds the whole nation. The counter-argument<br />

therefore is that the economy has to grow with<strong>in</strong> the parameters <strong>of</strong> locally<br />

available resource endowments.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!