21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> comparison <strong>of</strong> A × R and B × R crosses (<strong>in</strong> both A 1 and A 2 backgrounds) <strong>in</strong>dicated that while A × R (both A 1<br />

and A 2 ) crosses were significantly early (by 1 day <strong>in</strong> both A 1 and A 2 backgrounds for days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g) and<br />

significantly taller (by 0.2 m <strong>in</strong> A 1 and by 0.2 m <strong>in</strong> A 2 backgrounds), B × R crosses manifested higher gra<strong>in</strong> yield (by<br />

0.1 t ha -1 than A 1 and by 0.2 t ha -1 than A 2 cytoplasm) when average performance <strong>of</strong> A 1 and A 2 -based A × R and B ×<br />

R hybrids as separate groups was considered.<br />

Significant cytoplasmic effects were observed for all <strong>the</strong> traits when <strong>in</strong>dividual nuclear genetic backgrounds <strong>of</strong> A × R<br />

(both A 1 and A 2 ) and B × R crosses were exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Significant cytoplasm effects were detected <strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

nuclear genetic backgrounds for all <strong>the</strong> traits. While A × R crosses, besides be<strong>in</strong>g early, were taller compared to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> B × R crosses <strong>in</strong> a majority <strong>of</strong> nuclear genetic backgrounds, <strong>the</strong> reverse was true for gra<strong>in</strong> yield. <strong>The</strong>se results were<br />

not <strong>in</strong> conformity with those reported earlier, where<strong>in</strong> A × R crosses were significantly superior to B × R crosses for<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield suggest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> need for repetition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trials for onfirm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se results.<br />

BVS Reddy<br />

Shoot fly resistance: <strong>The</strong> F 1 hybrids based on different male-sterile cytoplasms were tested for resistance to<br />

sorghum shoot fly, A. soccata under field conditions us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terlard fishmeal technique. Seventy-two hybrids and 12<br />

restorers were tested for resistance to shoot fly under natural <strong>in</strong>festation. <strong>The</strong>re were three replications <strong>in</strong> a<br />

randomized complete block design. Data on shoot fly deadhearts were recorded at 18 days after seedl<strong>in</strong>g emergence,<br />

when <strong>the</strong> differences between <strong>the</strong> resistant and susceptible checks were maximum. Shoot fly deadhearts ranged from<br />

40.0 to 100.0% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hybrids, and it was 28.8% <strong>in</strong> IS 18551, 84.8% <strong>in</strong> 296B, and 81.2% <strong>in</strong> CSH 16. Hybrids based<br />

on ICSA 4 M were less susceptible than those based on o<strong>the</strong>r cytoplasms.<br />

In ano<strong>the</strong>r trial, 26 hybrids, 10 B-l<strong>in</strong>es, and 10 restorers along with resistant, IS 18551 and susceptible, CSH 16<br />

checks were evaluated for resistance to shoot fly, A. soccata. <strong>The</strong>re were three replications <strong>in</strong> a randomized<br />

complete block design. Data on shoot fly deadhearts was recorded at 18 days after seedl<strong>in</strong>g emergence, when <strong>the</strong><br />

differences between <strong>the</strong> resistant and susceptible checks were maximum. Shoot fly deadhearts ranged from 32.2 to<br />

78.4% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hybrids, and it was 46.1% <strong>in</strong> IS 18551, and 91.1% <strong>in</strong> CSH 16. Hybrids based on ICSA 425 and ICSA<br />

452 were less susceptible than those based on ICSA 455, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es for produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

shoot fly resistant hybrids.<br />

HC Sharma and BVS Reddy<br />

Activity 5A.4.2: Assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relationship between molecular diversity <strong>of</strong> parental and yield heterosis<br />

Milestone 5A.4.2.1: Relationship between parental molecular diversity and hybrid heterosis assessed<br />

(CTH/SPD/BVSR, 2009)<br />

To be reported subsequently<br />

Output target 5A.5: High-yield<strong>in</strong>g and good comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sorghum hybrid parents developed for postra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

season adaptation (2009)<br />

Activity 5A.5.1: Develop<strong>in</strong>g high-yield<strong>in</strong>g and good comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sorghum hybrid parents for postra<strong>in</strong>y season<br />

adaptation<br />

Milestone 5A.5.1.1: Five each <strong>of</strong> high-yield<strong>in</strong>g and good comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sorghum male-sterile l<strong>in</strong>es and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

for postra<strong>in</strong>y season developed (BVSR, 2009)<br />

Several early-matur<strong>in</strong>g advanced generation progenies derived from <strong>the</strong> crosses between postra<strong>in</strong>y season-adapted<br />

varieties, high-yield<strong>in</strong>g B-l<strong>in</strong>es and landraces were evaluated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2005 postra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 44 postra<strong>in</strong>y season-adapted F 6 progenies were evaluated and testcrossed onto A 1 –male-sterile l<strong>in</strong>e. From<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, 34 F 7 progenies were produced and <strong>the</strong>ir testcrosses were harvested. <strong>The</strong> selected progenies flowered <strong>in</strong><br />

76−86 days and had a plant height range <strong>of</strong> 1.3 to 2.1 m.<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!