21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

performed. Subsequently <strong>the</strong> molecular diversity data toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> trait diversity data will be analyzed and <strong>the</strong><br />

candidate genotypes with a greater TE and genetic diversities will be identified to develop new populations for TE.<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez, Rajeev Varshney and L Krishnamurthy<br />

Milestone: Range <strong>of</strong> variations for root traits assessed <strong>in</strong> groundnut germplasm (VV/SNN/RA/HDU) 2008<br />

Measurement <strong>of</strong> root traits, though better and more easily done <strong>in</strong> a controlled cyl<strong>in</strong>der system, rema<strong>in</strong>s a time<br />

consum<strong>in</strong>g exercice, with large error component, us<strong>in</strong>g destructive sampl<strong>in</strong>g, and provid<strong>in</strong>g “static” data that does<br />

provide little <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> actual activity <strong>of</strong> roots and <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>etics <strong>of</strong> this activity. In <strong>the</strong> end, more than <strong>the</strong><br />

roots, water uptake and <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>etics <strong>of</strong> water uptake to cope with term<strong>in</strong>al drought are important. We used 4<br />

groundnut genotypes and grew <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> 1.2 m PVC cyl<strong>in</strong>ders with 16 cm diameter. Plants were grown for 30 days.<br />

Fifteen plants per genotype were grown. At 30 DAS, 5 plants per genotype were harvested to assess root depth and<br />

root dry weight <strong>in</strong> 15-cm layers. <strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 10 cyl<strong>in</strong>ders were saturated with water, and 5 plants ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed under<br />

well-watered conditions (WW) and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 5 left with no fur<strong>the</strong>r irrigation (water stressed, WS). Cyl<strong>in</strong>der weight<br />

was recorded on a regular basis, usually every 3 days. Water loss <strong>in</strong> WW plants was adjusted to <strong>the</strong> cyl<strong>in</strong>der weight<br />

3 days after impos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> treatment. <strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> weigh<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cyl<strong>in</strong>ders was relatively simple and rapid. Data<br />

showed that 5 days after stress imposition, normalized TR (NTR) was about 50% <strong>of</strong> controls. <strong>The</strong>reafter, and until<br />

harvest at 17 days after treatment imposition, NTR <strong>of</strong> TMV 2, a genotype known to be drought-susceptible, was 20<br />

% lower than TAG 24 and ICGS 44 (<strong>the</strong>se 2 genotypes are known for deep and pr<strong>of</strong>use root<strong>in</strong>g). At 17 days after<br />

stress imposition, TMV 2 plants were permanently wilted whereas TAG 24 and ICGS 44 were not. Total<br />

transpiration values from <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> treatment imposition were similar <strong>in</strong> TAG 24 and TMV 2, but <strong>the</strong> total TR<br />

value from 5 to 17 days after stress imposition were about 20% higher <strong>in</strong> TAG 24 than <strong>in</strong> TMV 2, show<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

TAG 44 was able to manage better its water uptake compared to TMV 2, which allowed it to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> higher NTR<br />

later dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> stress. At harvest, root depth was measured after wash<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> roots and stretch<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> root were cut<br />

<strong>in</strong> 15 cm portions, which were dried and weighted. We found that <strong>the</strong>re was no significant correlation between ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

root dry weights, or with root dry weight <strong>in</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 15-cm portion and TR. By contrast, total TR between 5 and<br />

17 days after stress imposition was related to root depth. <strong>The</strong>se data show that <strong>the</strong>re is variation for <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

water extraction, and that root dry weight, which is usually well correlated to root length density, appears to be a<br />

poor proxy for water uptake.<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez<br />

Milestone: Molecular markers ready for validation and use <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>trogression studies for abiotic and biotic stresses<br />

(VV/RA/SNN/RKV) 2009<br />

<strong>The</strong> set <strong>of</strong> polymorphic markers suitable to map QTLs <strong>in</strong> groundnut is be<strong>in</strong>g built up.<br />

Rajeev Varshney and V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez<br />

Milestone: QTLs for root traits identified (VV/SNN/RA) 2011<br />

In <strong>the</strong> experiment reported above, we showed that though root traits displayed variation between genotypes. Only<br />

<strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> root depth were related to differences <strong>in</strong> water uptake, whereas differences <strong>in</strong> dry weight at<br />

different soil depth were not. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, differences <strong>in</strong> water extraction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 10 days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiment were<br />

relatively larger than <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> root depth. This shows that water uptake is probably a better estimator <strong>of</strong><br />

“root” traits than root traits (such as root length density, depth, dW, etc.) traditionally measured.<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez<br />

Output target 6B.2: High throughput molecular genetic and phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g platforms for drought and sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

stress and promis<strong>in</strong>g transgenic events <strong>of</strong> groundnut for tolerance to drought stress available for<br />

commercialization and <strong>in</strong>trogression <strong>in</strong> locally adapted germplasm<br />

Activity 6B.2.1: Develop groundnut transgenic events for enhanced tolerance to drought<br />

Milestone: 50 transgenic events <strong>of</strong> groundnut with DREB1A gene screened for drought tolerance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

greenhouse (KKS/VV/RA) 2007<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!