21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

potential for use by smallholder farmers <strong>in</strong> semi-arid areas. Central to <strong>the</strong> package are <strong>the</strong> plant<strong>in</strong>g bas<strong>in</strong>s which<br />

measure approximately 15 cm long, 15 cm deep and 15cm wide. <strong>The</strong>se bas<strong>in</strong>s are prepared dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dry season<br />

when demands on family labour are relatively low. <strong>The</strong>y are dug without hav<strong>in</strong>g to plough <strong>the</strong> field, thus<br />

overcom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> animal draught power shortages. Bas<strong>in</strong> plant<strong>in</strong>g works on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that ra<strong>the</strong>r than spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nutrients and water uniformly over <strong>the</strong> field, it concentrates <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>s to maximize yield for a given level <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>puts. When <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>s beg<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>s collect ra<strong>in</strong>water and ensure good germ<strong>in</strong>ation and a healthy crop stand,<br />

even if <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>s are erratic. <strong>The</strong> bas<strong>in</strong> is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with o<strong>the</strong>r crop/soil management practices, such as <strong>the</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> crop residues over <strong>the</strong> field to protect <strong>the</strong> top soil aga<strong>in</strong>st erosion, or with manure and/or fertilizer. <strong>The</strong> bas<strong>in</strong><br />

technology was evaluated under smallholder farmer management for two cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons from 2004 to <strong>2006</strong> <strong>in</strong> dry<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn and western Zimbabwe. Compared to plough<strong>in</strong>g, bas<strong>in</strong>s significantly <strong>in</strong>creased maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />

across eight districts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first season (Figure 9B4). In <strong>the</strong> second season, data from 435 farmers across 10 districts<br />

showed that bas<strong>in</strong>s gave higher maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield and water use efficiency compared to plough<strong>in</strong>g. Yield <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

for districts ranged from 15 to 72% with a mean <strong>of</strong> 36%. <strong>The</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>s yield advantage was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> soil fertility amendment used (Table 9B1). <strong>The</strong> bas<strong>in</strong> technology has potential for adoption by smallholders<br />

despite <strong>the</strong> challenges farmers face with respect to labour for bas<strong>in</strong> preparation and weed control, as well as<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g soil cover us<strong>in</strong>g crop residues.<br />

Table 9B1. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg ha -1 ) and water use efficiency (kg ha -1 /mm total ra<strong>in</strong>fall) response to<br />

plant<strong>in</strong>g bas<strong>in</strong>s and plough<strong>in</strong>g for 10 districts <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn and western Zimbabwe as <strong>in</strong>fluenced by soil<br />

fertility amendment used, 2005/06 season<br />

Fertility amendments used Tillage n Gra<strong>in</strong><br />

yield<br />

Water use<br />

efficiency<br />

Basal <strong>in</strong>organic + Top dress<strong>in</strong>g Bas<strong>in</strong>s 108 2676 a 3.97 a<br />

Plough 56 2118 b 3.11 b<br />

Manure + basal <strong>in</strong>organic + top<br />

dress<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bas<strong>in</strong>s 140 2485 a 3.56 a<br />

Plough 19 1678 b 2.47 b<br />

Manure + top dress<strong>in</strong>g Bas<strong>in</strong>s 125 2408 a 3.63 a<br />

Plough 105 1705 b 2.72 b<br />

Top dress<strong>in</strong>g only Bas<strong>in</strong>s 16 2165 3.31<br />

Plough 84 1780 2.63<br />

Sed<br />

Fertility amendments<br />

268.6*** 0.424***<br />

used<br />

Tillage 278.3*** 0.439***<br />

Fertility amendment<br />

275.3ns 0.434ns<br />

used *tillage<br />

With<strong>in</strong> each fertility management category, tillage means with different superscripts differ (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!