21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Project 6<br />

Produc<strong>in</strong>g more and better food at lower cost <strong>of</strong> staple open-poll<strong>in</strong>ated cereals and legumes<br />

(sorghum, pearl millet, pigeonpea, chickpea and groundnut) through genetic improvement<br />

and crop management <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Asian SAT<br />

Groundnut<br />

Output A: Improved germplasm and varieties <strong>of</strong> sorghum, pearl millet, pigeonpea, chickpea, and groundnut<br />

with pro-poor traits and advanced knowledge <strong>of</strong> selection tools and breed<strong>in</strong>g methods made available to<br />

partners <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />

MTP Output Targets <strong>2006</strong>:<br />

At least 15 new varieties with resistance to late leaf spot and rust available and shared with partners<br />

Farmer preferred varieties <strong>in</strong> India, Vietnam and Ch<strong>in</strong>a identified and dissem<strong>in</strong>ated amongst partners<br />

Activity 6A.1.1: Evaluate and <strong>in</strong>trogress new germplasm sources (cultivated and wild Arachis species) <strong>of</strong><br />

variability for yield components, resistance to rust, LLS, and o<strong>the</strong>r emerg<strong>in</strong>g diseases, crop duration, and<br />

food and fodder quality traits<br />

Milestone: At least 100 crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g diverse germplasm and breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for aforementioned traits effected<br />

(SNN/RA/FW/PLK) 2009<br />

N<strong>in</strong>ety-seven crosses (42 for foliar diseases, 22 for medium-duration, 10 for short-duration, and 23 for confectionery<br />

traits) were made dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2005/06 post-ra<strong>in</strong>y and <strong>the</strong> <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y seasons to generate populations for selection for<br />

high yield, diseases resistance, desired crop duration, and confectionery traits <strong>in</strong> desirable agronomic backgrounds.<br />

New parents used <strong>in</strong> hybridization <strong>in</strong>cluded high-yield<strong>in</strong>g foliar diseases tolerant breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (ICGV 04060,<br />

ICGV 04055, ICGV 04078, and ICGV 04093); germplasm l<strong>in</strong>es (ICG 7340, ICG 6843, ICG 7621, and ICG 6330);<br />

high-yield<strong>in</strong>g and medium-duration advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (ICGV 04112, ICGV 04124, ICGV 04149, ICGV<br />

99159, and ICGV 95069); short-duration advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (ICGV 00308, ICGV 93392, ICGV 00290, and<br />

Nyanda); high-yield<strong>in</strong>g, advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es with confectionery traits, (ICGV 99083, ICGV 00350, ICGV<br />

00451, and ICGV 00440), and germplasm l<strong>in</strong>es (ICG 6767, ICG 6670, and ICG 1651).<br />

SN Nigam and R Aruna<br />

Milestone: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> groundnut l<strong>in</strong>es for resistance to late leaf spot (LLS) and rust dur<strong>in</strong>g under field<br />

conditions:<br />

Late leaf spot (LLS) (Phaeoisariopsis personata) and rust (Pucc<strong>in</strong>ia arachidis) are <strong>the</strong> most serious fungal diseases<br />

<strong>of</strong> groundnut, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season. Systematic screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> groundnut germplasm and breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es was<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field and laboratory to <strong>in</strong>corporate resistance <strong>in</strong>to high yield<strong>in</strong>g cultivars with agronomic and quality<br />

characters suited to different environments. Ten groundnut breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (ICGV 37, ICGV 00005, ICGV 00064,<br />

ICGV 01270, ICGV 01276, ICGV 92267, ICGV 86590, ICGV 87846, ICGV 99029, and ICGV 00068) along with<br />

<strong>the</strong> susceptible cultivar TMV 2, and a resistant control ICG 13919, were evaluated aga<strong>in</strong>st late leaf spot and rust at<br />

61, 74, 92, 106, and 123 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g (DAS) at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru, India, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />

Highly significant differences were observed among <strong>the</strong> genotypes <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> trials for disease score (LLS and rust)<br />

and leaf area damage (LAD).<br />

Late leaf spot (LLS): At 92 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g (DAS), <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ten advanced groundnut breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es evaluated,<br />

ICGV 00068 (LLS score = 2.7; LAD = 7.0) was highly resistant. Six l<strong>in</strong>es showed a disease score between 3.0 – 5.0<br />

and LAD = 11.0 - 26.0 as compared to <strong>the</strong> resistant check ICG 13919 (LLS score = 2.7 and LAD = 6.3) and<br />

susceptible check TMV 2 (LLS score = 7.0 and LAD = 60.0) (Fig. 1).<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!