21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conditions, fully expanded quadrifoliate leaves <strong>of</strong> 45 days old plants (third or fourth from <strong>the</strong> top) <strong>of</strong> each l<strong>in</strong>e were<br />

excised and planted <strong>in</strong> sand cultures (roughly 1.5 cm thick) <strong>in</strong> plastic trays (39.5 × 29 × 7 cm). In each tray, 20<br />

leaflets were planted and <strong>the</strong> trays were covered with plastic bags and <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> growth chamber at 24 ºC and<br />

85% relative humidity. <strong>The</strong> LLS <strong>in</strong>oculum (30000 spores ml -1 ) was sprayed on both <strong>the</strong> surfaces <strong>of</strong> each leaflet.<br />

Some plants showed latent period (LP) <strong>of</strong> 30 - 36 days after <strong>in</strong>oculation and 2 - 5 lesions with m<strong>in</strong>imum lesion<br />

diameter (6.0. Data<br />

showed that <strong>the</strong> segregation is very high <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> crosses, and <strong>the</strong>re were no differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parent l<strong>in</strong>e plants (Table<br />

4).<br />

Table 4. Area under <strong>the</strong> disease progress curve (AUDPC), disease score, and leaf area damage (LAD) <strong>in</strong> F 3<br />

progenies (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru, <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season).<br />

Crosses<br />

No <strong>of</strong> AUDPC Score * LAD (%) *<br />

Progenies Mean M<strong>in</strong> Max Mean M<strong>in</strong> Max Mean M<strong>in</strong> Max<br />

(JL 24-P2 x ICG<br />

11337-P2) 166 1567 500 2581 6 2 9 51 5 95<br />

(JL 24-P5 x ICG<br />

11337-P5) 18 1687 816 2485 6 3 8 41 10 80<br />

(JL 24-P6 x ICG<br />

13919-P6) 134 1411 568 2265 6 2 9 43 5 95<br />

(JL 24-P8 x ICG<br />

13919-P8) 118 1534 511 2459 6 4 9 46 10 95<br />

ICG 11337 1 752 647 935 3 3 3 9 6 10<br />

ICG 13919 1 719 593 813 3 3 4 10 6 12<br />

JL 24 1 1779 1553 1987 9 9 9 100 95 100<br />

* Score = Late leaf spot disease score on 1 - 9 scale; LAD = Leaf area damage (%) at 110 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Based on mean data <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> plants <strong>in</strong> each progeny, four progenies and two parent l<strong>in</strong>es showed resistance to LLS<br />

with score <strong>of</strong> 3.0, 38 progenies showed a disease score <strong>of</strong> 4.0, 79 had score <strong>of</strong> 5.0, and <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g progenies<br />

recorded a score <strong>of</strong> 6 - 9 on 1 - 9 scale. Leaf area damage was 7.5 - 95.5%. Area under <strong>the</strong> disease progress curve<br />

(AUDPC) was observed <strong>in</strong> a range from 615 to 2285 among <strong>the</strong> progenies at 110 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

mean data <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> plants and progenies <strong>in</strong> each cross, it was observed that <strong>the</strong> AUDPC, disease score and leaf area<br />

damage were more than double <strong>in</strong> JL 24 and <strong>in</strong> crosses, compared to ICG 11337 and ICG 13919 parent l<strong>in</strong>es (Fig.<br />

4a, b).<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!