21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

II. Pearl millet<br />

Output target 5B.1: At least five sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant improved breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es/ populations <strong>of</strong> pearl millet<br />

identified and feasibility <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerant hybrids assessed (VV/KNR/RB) (2009)<br />

Activity 5B.1.1: Develop sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant l<strong>in</strong>es and populations <strong>in</strong> pearl millet and assess <strong>the</strong>ir hybrid<br />

potential under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions<br />

Milestone 5B.1.1.1: Inbred l<strong>in</strong>es and populations identified as sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant <strong>in</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary evaluations reevaluated<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance and yield potential (KNR/RB/VV, 2008)<br />

Four yield trials consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 5−70 entries were evaluated at <strong>the</strong> Agricultural Research Station <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Sciences at Gangavathi under sal<strong>in</strong>e field condition (10 dSm -1 ). <strong>The</strong> data are awaited. A trial <strong>of</strong> 13<br />

entries consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> five parental l<strong>in</strong>es (3 sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerant and 2 susceptible) and 6 hybrids derived from <strong>the</strong>m, along<br />

with two sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant populations, was conducted under non-sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions at Patancheru to assess <strong>the</strong>ir yield<br />

potential. A hybrid (ICMA 01222 × ICMP 451) based on sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant male and female l<strong>in</strong>es had <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield (3400 kg ha -1 ) and it flowered <strong>in</strong> 47 days, followed by ano<strong>the</strong>r hybrid also based on sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant<br />

parental l<strong>in</strong>es (female parent ICMB 95333 and male parent ICMP 451) that had 3355 kg ha -1 <strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and<br />

flowered <strong>in</strong> 48 days. In comparison, <strong>the</strong> dual-purpose commercial hybrid ICMH 451 (based on sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant male<br />

parent ICMP 451 and susceptible female parent 81B) had 3260 kg ha -1 <strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and flowered <strong>in</strong> 49 days.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se two new hybrid, however had lower dry stover yield (3370 and 3320 kg ha -1 ) compared to ICMH 451<br />

(3850 kg ha -1 ). Among <strong>the</strong> dwarf parental l<strong>in</strong>es, ICMB 01222 had <strong>the</strong> highest gra<strong>in</strong> yield (1970 kg ha -1 ) and it<br />

flowered <strong>in</strong> 51 days compared to 1420 kg ha -1 <strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield for 81B, which flowered <strong>in</strong> 54 days. However, 81B had<br />

2490 kg ha -1 <strong>of</strong> dry stover yield compared to 1900 kg ha -1 for ICMB 01222.<br />

KN Rai, Ranjana Bhattacherjee and V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez<br />

Pearl millet breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> farmer’s field <strong>in</strong> Orissa: We have tested promis<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant pearl<br />

millet parental breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> coastal Orissa. <strong>The</strong>re is a large range <strong>of</strong> adaptation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se genotypes to <strong>the</strong> area,<br />

and some accessions such as HHVBC Tall, Raj 171, IP 6105, IP 6106, IP 19586 were able to produce over 10 t ha -1<br />

<strong>of</strong> dry fodder yield <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e field over two cutt<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong>se results are promis<strong>in</strong>g because <strong>the</strong>y provide <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

to have pearl millet <strong>success</strong>fully grown <strong>in</strong> that transiently sal<strong>in</strong>ity-affected rice-based cropp<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez, L Krishnamurthy and KN Rai<br />

Output target 5B.2: Putative QTLs for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance <strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> and stover yield identified <strong>in</strong> pearl millet<br />

(2009)<br />

Activity 5B.2.1: Genotyp<strong>in</strong>g and phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance<br />

Milestone 5B.2.1.1: Putative QTL for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance based on 160 RILs from one mapp<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

identified (CTH/SS/VV, 2009)<br />

Confirmation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contrast for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance between parents <strong>of</strong> pearl millet populations: Twenty<br />

parental l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> ten pearl millet mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations were tested for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield ratio as<br />

a selection criterion. This was a repeat experiment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous year, where 6 pairs <strong>of</strong> parents showed good<br />

contrast for <strong>the</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield ratio. In <strong>the</strong> current trial, 4 pairs out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se 6 previously identified confirmed that trend.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong>se, pairs 1 (LGD 1-B-10 and ICMP 85410-P7) and 3 (863B-P2 and 841B-P3) appear more suitable for<br />

molecular marker identification, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large phenotypic differences and differences <strong>in</strong> marker<br />

polymorphism. However, based on <strong>the</strong> similarity <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield under control conditions (43.4 and 47.9 g plant -1 for<br />

841B-P3 and 863B-P2, respectively), and <strong>the</strong> large differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir gra<strong>in</strong> yields under sal<strong>in</strong>ity, <strong>the</strong> pair 841B-P3<br />

and 863B-P2 appeared to be <strong>the</strong> most suitable. We also found two o<strong>the</strong>r pairs that showed contrasts for gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />

ratio.<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!