21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a 1 - 9 rat<strong>in</strong>g scale. No resistance (50 g 100 seeds -1 ) and high resistance to<br />

FW developed (PMG/SP/HDU) 2009<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> FW resistant extra-large seeded Kabuli chickpea germplasm: <strong>The</strong>re are many sources with<br />

high levels <strong>of</strong> resistance to FW <strong>in</strong> Desi chickpea, while resistance <strong>in</strong> Kabuli types is limited. Desi x Kabuli crosses<br />

have been widely used at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g FW resistance <strong>in</strong> Kabuli chickpeas. However, most Kabuli<br />

varieties that <strong>in</strong>volved one or more Desi parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pedigree have a brown t<strong>in</strong>ge <strong>in</strong> seed color, e.g., Swetha<br />

(ICCV 2), KAK 2 (ICCV 92311), JGK 1 (ICCV 92337), and Vihar (ICCV 95311), while <strong>the</strong> market prefers cream<br />

to white (zero tann<strong>in</strong>) seed color <strong>in</strong> Kabuli chickpea. Thus, it is important to identify additional sources <strong>of</strong> FW<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> Kabuli chickpea, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> large-seeded category, so that large-seeded Kabuli varieties with<br />

resistance to FW and typical Kabuli type seed (ram’s head shape and white seed color) can be developed from<br />

Kabuli x Kabuli crosses.<br />

We selected 50 large-seeded Kabuli chickpea germplasm l<strong>in</strong>es from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s gene bank and evaluated <strong>the</strong>m for<br />

agronomic traits at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004/05 post-ra<strong>in</strong>y season. From <strong>the</strong>se, 12 accessions hav<strong>in</strong>g seed<br />

size <strong>of</strong> more than 50 g 100-seeds -1 were selected for fur<strong>the</strong>r evaluation. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2005/06 post-ra<strong>in</strong>y season, one<br />

set <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se genotypes was grown <strong>in</strong> wilt sick plot for screen<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st FW, and ano<strong>the</strong>r set <strong>in</strong> wilt free area for<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> agronomic traits. Two accessions, ICC 14194 and ICC 17109, orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from Mexico, showed<br />

complete resistance (0% plant mortality) to FW, whereas o<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>es showed 11 to 100 % plant mortality (Table 1).<br />

<strong>The</strong> resistant control (WR 315) had no plant mortality, whereas <strong>the</strong> early-wilt susceptible check (JG 62) had 100%,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> late-wilt susceptible check (K 850) had 87% mortality. Both <strong>the</strong> resistant accessions had p<strong>in</strong>nate (fern) leaf,<br />

which is common leaf type <strong>in</strong> chickpea. ICC 14194 was very early (97 days), while ICC 17109 was medium<br />

maturity (115 days). Two accessions (ICC 14194 and ICC 14198) were very early (days to maturity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!