21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig 1. Relationships among 3008 sorghum landrace accessions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Generation Challenge Program<br />

composite germplasm collection for sorghum, based on allelic variation at 39 SSR loci distributed across<br />

all 10 sorghum l<strong>in</strong>age groups. In this figure landraces represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> five major sorghum races are<br />

colored: race bicolor accessions are orange, race kafir are red, race durra (D) are blue, race caudatum<br />

(C) are green, and race gu<strong>in</strong>ea (G) are purple (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> margaritiferum group, Gm). Geographic<br />

regions from which <strong>the</strong> different groups <strong>of</strong> accessions orig<strong>in</strong>ated are: W Africa = Western Africa; S<br />

Africa = Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa; E Africa = Eastern Africa; C Africa = Central Africa; IND = Indian<br />

subcont<strong>in</strong>ent; and, E Asia = Eastern Asia (Figure courtesy <strong>of</strong> Claire Billot).<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> - CT Hash, HD Upadhyaya, Punna Ramu and DA Hois<strong>in</strong>gton;<br />

CIRAD – C Billot, J-F Rami, L Gardes, R Rivalian and M Deu;<br />

CAAS – Y Li, T Wang and P Lu.<br />

Milestone C.3.1.7: Genetic diversity and population structure <strong>of</strong> chickpea and sorghum assessed<br />

(HDU/CTH/RKV/PR/CLLG/SC/DH/PMG/MB/SMU/CB/JB/SC, 2007)<br />

Chickpea:<br />

<strong>The</strong> composite collection was genotyped us<strong>in</strong>g high throughput assay (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>: ABI3700 and ICARDA:<br />

ABI3100) and 50 SSR markers. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> generated data on 35 SSR loci and ICARDA on 15 SSR loci on 3000<br />

accessions. Except for TA21, TA22, TA28, and TA58, all markers produced an allele size expected on <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> SSR repeat motif). Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary data analysis detected 1829 alleles, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 15 to 68 alleles with an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 36.6 alleles per SSR locus. Mean PIC (Polymorphism Information Content) value <strong>of</strong> 0.858 (rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from 0.471 to 0.974) and gene diversity 0.873 (rang<strong>in</strong>g 0.536 – 0.975) were observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire composite<br />

collection (Table 6). Kabuli types were more genetically diverse than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three types. Gene diversity<br />

ranged from 0.253 to 0.965 <strong>in</strong> kabuli types, 0.419 to 0.974 <strong>in</strong> desi, 0.479 to 0.955 <strong>in</strong> pea-shaped, and 0.560 to<br />

0.928 <strong>in</strong> wild types. Accessions from <strong>the</strong> West Asia region revealed high gene diversity (0.871) while those<br />

from Oceania revealed lowest gene diversity (0.504) (Table 5). Detected 1539 rare and 290 common alleles at<br />

5% and 1137 rare and 692 common alleles at 1% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire composite collection. <strong>The</strong>re were 252 alleles that<br />

were detected <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> four biological groups (desi, kabuli, pea-shaped, and wild relatives). Accessions from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Mediterranean region had <strong>the</strong> largest number <strong>of</strong> region-specific alleles (137) and 69 alleles were common<br />

across all <strong>the</strong> seven geographical regions. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal coord<strong>in</strong>ate analysis del<strong>in</strong>eated <strong>the</strong> accessions <strong>in</strong> two clusters<br />

(Fig 2). <strong>The</strong> desi and kabuli chickpeas each formed two dist<strong>in</strong>ct clusters; however, a number <strong>of</strong> desi chickpeas<br />

also grouped <strong>in</strong>to kabuli cluster <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g progressive evolution <strong>of</strong> kabuli traits from <strong>the</strong> desi chickpeas.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!