21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season, ICMV 06111 gave 9.1 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong> dry forage yield at 80-d harvest, which was<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forage yield <strong>of</strong> ICMA 00999 × IP 17315 and comparable to that <strong>of</strong> Proagro 1 (8.9 t ha -1 ). ICMV 06111<br />

flowered <strong>in</strong> 87 days compared to 69 days for ICMA 00999 × IP 17315 and 54 days for Proagro 1.<br />

KN Rai and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 5A.6.1.2: Improved populations and experimental hybrids with high forage yield potential developed<br />

(KNR/RB/ HDU/MB, 2009)<br />

Open-poll<strong>in</strong>ated varieties hybrids with high forage yield: N<strong>in</strong>e OPVs developed for forage purposes have now<br />

been evaluated for two years (ra<strong>in</strong>y season <strong>of</strong> 2005 and <strong>2006</strong>) at Patancheru. Based on <strong>the</strong> mean performance across<br />

<strong>the</strong> two years, ICMV 05555 was found to be <strong>the</strong> highest-yield<strong>in</strong>g, giv<strong>in</strong>g 14.8 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong> dry forage yield at 80-d<br />

harvest, which was 14% more than that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> control (ICMA 00999 × IP 17315). Ano<strong>the</strong>r variety ICMV 05777<br />

gave 13.1 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry forage yield, which was comparable to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> control (13.0 t ha -1 ). ICMV 05555<br />

flowered <strong>in</strong> 70 days and ICMV 05777 <strong>in</strong> 74 days compared to 69 days for <strong>the</strong> control. <strong>The</strong>re were five additional<br />

varieties that had 10.3−11.9 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry forage yield. Two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se flowered <strong>in</strong> 60 and 65 days, one <strong>in</strong> 78 days,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two flowered <strong>in</strong> 94 days. <strong>The</strong> yield potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter two is likely to be higher if harvested at 90-<br />

95d harvest.<br />

Twenty-seven topcross hybrids produced by cross<strong>in</strong>g three forage type male-sterile l<strong>in</strong>es (ICMA 89111, ICMA<br />

00999 and ICMA 03222) with each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e forage populations were evaluated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2005 and <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

seasons for forage yield at 50 and 80-day harvest. Based on <strong>the</strong> mean performance over <strong>the</strong> two seasons, seven<br />

hybrids (3 on ICMA 89111 and 4 on ICMA 00999) produced 12.5-13.8 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong> dry forage yield (11.8 t ha -1 for<br />

control hybrid, ICMA 00999 × IP 17315) at <strong>the</strong> 80-d harvest. <strong>The</strong> highest yield was obta<strong>in</strong>ed for hybrid ICMA<br />

00999 × ICMV 05222 (13.8 t ha -1 ). All <strong>the</strong> selected hybrids flowered <strong>in</strong> 65−75 days (72 days for <strong>the</strong> check hybrid).<br />

KN Rai, HD Upadhyaya and Michael Blümmel<br />

Milestone 5A.6.1.3: Diverse seed parents with high forage yield potential developed and characterized<br />

(KNR/RB/MB, 2012)<br />

Hybrid parents progenies: We evaluated 24 advanced generation progenies (F 6 /F 9 ), <strong>of</strong> which 18 were selected<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> visual assessment <strong>of</strong> forage yield. Of <strong>the</strong>se, 17 flowered <strong>in</strong> 51−60 days (checks ICMB 00999 flowered<br />

<strong>in</strong> 47 days and ICMB 98777 <strong>in</strong> 58 days). Sixteen potential forage type seed-parental l<strong>in</strong>es with 50−60 days <strong>of</strong><br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g were <strong>in</strong>tercrossed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> postra<strong>in</strong>y season. <strong>The</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g 16 F 1 ’s were evaluated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

season for biomass, <strong>of</strong> which 10 were selected based on <strong>the</strong> visual assessment <strong>of</strong> forage yield, with <strong>the</strong>ir flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g between 50 and 55 days. We also evaluated 155 S 2 /S 6 population progenies (earlier selected for high<br />

biomass yield) dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season, <strong>of</strong> which 60 were visually selected for high biomass yield, produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

120 progenies. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> progenies flowered <strong>in</strong> 50−60 days (check ICMP 451 flowered <strong>in</strong> 50 days).<br />

KN Rai and Michael Blümmel<br />

Output target 5A.7: Information on breed<strong>in</strong>g efficiency and genetics <strong>of</strong> three diverse cytoplasmic-nuclear<br />

male-sterility (CMS) systems <strong>in</strong> pearl millet documented (2009)<br />

Activity 5A.7.1: Documentation <strong>of</strong> research results related to CMS genetics and breed<strong>in</strong>g efficiency <strong>in</strong> pearl<br />

millet<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.1: Comparative studies on efficiency <strong>of</strong> three diverse CMS systems completed (KNR, 2008)<br />

<strong>The</strong> field trial data from two years and 2−3 locations have been analyzed, show<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> hybrids based on <strong>the</strong> A 4<br />

cytoplasm give about 5% less gra<strong>in</strong> yield than those based on <strong>the</strong> A 1 cytoplasm, although <strong>the</strong>re is large cytoplasm ×<br />

genotype <strong>in</strong>teraction. <strong>The</strong>se results will be written up for formal publication <strong>in</strong> 2007/2008.<br />

KN Rai<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!