21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sweet sorghum male-sterile l<strong>in</strong>e development: A total <strong>of</strong> 10 crosses were made <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es with high Brix<br />

(SSV 84, ICSV 700) and low Brix (ISIAP DORADO, BTx 623), and high-yield<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (ICSB 52 and ICSB 101).<br />

<strong>The</strong> 10 F 1 s are planted <strong>in</strong> <strong>2006</strong> postra<strong>in</strong>y season for advancement.<br />

Milestone: 5A.6.1.2: Six new high-yield<strong>in</strong>g sweet sorghum restorers identified (BVSR/HDU, 2008)<br />

Sweet sorghum varietal and restorers trial: Based on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> sweet sorghum varieties and restorers <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> trial dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2005 ra<strong>in</strong>y season, 45 l<strong>in</strong>es were selected and evaluated along with <strong>the</strong> checks SSV 74, SSV 84<br />

and NSSH 104. Compared to <strong>the</strong> sugar yield <strong>in</strong> checks (SSV 74: 1.2 t ha -1 , SSV 84: 0.5 t ha -1 and NSSH 104: 1.1 t<br />

ha -1 ), 14 varieties were significantly superior (1.67 to 3.0 t ha -1 ). Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es had high brix read<strong>in</strong>g but poor<br />

juice yield. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>in</strong>clude IS 21991 (21.2), SP 4511-3 (21.0) and SP 4511-2 (20.0). <strong>The</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es will be used <strong>in</strong><br />

cross<strong>in</strong>g program. <strong>The</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> top five high-yield<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for sugar yield is given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.<br />

BVS Reddy<br />

Table 3. Performance <strong>of</strong> selected sweet sorghum varieties/restorers (at maturity stage) - 2005<br />

postra<strong>in</strong>y season at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru<br />

Plant Cane Juice<br />

height yield yield Brix read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Variety/restorer<br />

Days to 50%<br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g (m) (t ha -1 ) (t ha -1 ) at maturity<br />

SP 4484-2 94 2.0 36.3 18.08 16.0 3.0<br />

SP 4487-3 95 2.1 35.3 14.0 17.7 2.4<br />

SP 4504-2 95 2.2 33.3 14.0 17.3 2.3<br />

SP 4482-2 94 2.2 29.8 13.2 18.7 2.3<br />

SP 4482-1 95 2.0 33.4 13.4 17.0 2.2<br />

SSV 84 (Check) 86 1.5 10.7 2.7 17.3 0.5<br />

NSSH 104 (Check) 86 2.0 19.5 7.6 14.2 1.1<br />

SSV 74 (Check) 88 2.1 18.9 6.5 18.7 1.2<br />

Mean 94 1.9 20.6 7.6 16.2 1.2<br />

CV (%) 1.9 7.9 27.8 23.5 12.0 28.9<br />

CD (5%) 2.85 0.24 9.28 2.90 3.15 0.57<br />

Sugar yield based on<br />

Brix read<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

juice yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Output target 5A.7: Stay-green QTLs associated with improved fodder quality <strong>in</strong>trogressed <strong>in</strong>to elite<br />

sorghum hybrid parents and <strong>the</strong>ir potential utility assessed (2010)<br />

Activity 5A.7.1: Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>trogression <strong>of</strong> stay-green QTL <strong>in</strong>to elite parental l<strong>in</strong>es, and assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir effects on hybrid performance<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.1: Assessment <strong>of</strong> near-isogenic BC 3 F 3 and BC 4 F 3 stay-green QTL <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es completed <strong>in</strong><br />

R 16 and ISIAP Dorado backgrounds (2010)<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> early-generation R 16 stay-green QTL <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es: We completed two years <strong>of</strong> field<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial (BC 1 and BC 2 ) stay-green (non-senescent) <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es with 1−4 QTL <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

background <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indian postra<strong>in</strong>y season sorghum variety R 16. <strong>The</strong> primary objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation were to<br />

(1) assess <strong>the</strong> phenotypic expression <strong>of</strong> various stay-green QTL under postra<strong>in</strong>y season conditions, when available<br />

(stored) soil moisture is limited, and stress-<strong>in</strong>duced crop senescence is <strong>the</strong> norm, and (2) assess <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> staygreen<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ability to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> moisture-deficit environments and on <strong>the</strong> rum<strong>in</strong>ant nutritional quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> stover. <strong>The</strong>re were differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> senescence patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various QTL <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es, but <strong>in</strong> general,<br />

across all test environments, <strong>the</strong> average percent green leaf area (% GLA) <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es fell between<br />

<strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two parents. Even though a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es conta<strong>in</strong>ed many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> putative staygreen<br />

QTL from B 35, none demonstrated <strong>the</strong> same degree <strong>of</strong> stay-green as did B 35, especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>-fill<strong>in</strong>g period. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> various stay-green QTL from B 35 to R<br />

16 was <strong>success</strong>ful <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> stay-green character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter, <strong>in</strong> both stress and non-stress conditions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were significant, l<strong>in</strong>ear and positive (although somewhat variable) relationships <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

normal green leaf area, and normal gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g with 100-gra<strong>in</strong> mass (r 2 = 0.32 and 0.56) and gra<strong>in</strong> yield (r 2 = 0.34<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!