21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Collaborat<strong>in</strong>g Institutions and Scientists:<br />

TNAU : K Palanisami, Nedumaran<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> : B Shiferaw, SP Wani, TK Sreedevi<br />

1D.7. Development <strong>of</strong> a dynamic non-l<strong>in</strong>ear bioeconomic model with crop-livestock <strong>in</strong>tegration (Asia)<br />

Bioeconomic models are useful tools <strong>in</strong> policy analysis because <strong>the</strong>y can reflect <strong>the</strong> biophysical as well as<br />

socioeconomic conditions essential for decision mak<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>in</strong> specific “bioeconomy”. <strong>The</strong>y may be used to<br />

explore <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kages between ecology and <strong>the</strong> economy and <strong>the</strong> dynamic effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>kages over time. In<br />

this study a watershed level dynamic non-l<strong>in</strong>ear bioeconomic model with crop-livestock <strong>in</strong>tegration is developed<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Kothapally watershed. This model maximizes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole watershed, which <strong>in</strong>clude three<br />

types <strong>of</strong> households based on land endowment (small, medium, large), who are spatially disaggregated <strong>in</strong>to six<br />

different segment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> watershed landscape [three types <strong>of</strong> soils based on soil depth (shallow, medium and<br />

deep) and two types <strong>of</strong> land (dryland and irrigated land)]. <strong>The</strong> model maximizes <strong>the</strong> aggregate net present value<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> watershed over a 10 year plann<strong>in</strong>g horizon. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> household groups is def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

<strong>the</strong> present value <strong>of</strong> future <strong>in</strong>come earned from different livelihood sources (like crop, livestock, non-farm, etc)<br />

subject to constra<strong>in</strong>ts on level, quality and distribution <strong>of</strong> key production factors (e.g., land, labour, capital,<br />

bullock power, soil depth), animal feed requirement and m<strong>in</strong>imum subsistence food requirements for <strong>the</strong><br />

consumers <strong>in</strong> each household group.<br />

<strong>The</strong> crop production <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model is affected by change <strong>in</strong> soil depth, which is reduc<strong>in</strong>g due to soil erosion. <strong>The</strong><br />

erosion level <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> watershed is estimated for predicted land use pattern and through transition equation soil<br />

erosion reduces <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial soil depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> land. By us<strong>in</strong>g econometric method <strong>the</strong> yield-soil depth response is<br />

estimated and used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production function <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bioeconomic model. <strong>The</strong> nutrient balance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> watershed<br />

is estimated by us<strong>in</strong>g a nutrient balance equation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model. This equation estimates <strong>the</strong> nutrient balances for<br />

<strong>the</strong> simulation period based on <strong>in</strong>flow (fertilizer and manure application, biological fixation and atmospheric<br />

deposition) and outflow (crop gra<strong>in</strong>s and residual yield, erosion and leach<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>of</strong> nutrients <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> watershed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>e model serves as a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for policy experiments to assess <strong>the</strong> likely impact <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />

policy <strong>in</strong>tervention. <strong>The</strong> bioeconomic model used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study analyses <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects <strong>of</strong> land<br />

degradation, population growth and market imperfections on household production, welfare and food security.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study, which is a Ph.D dissertation, concludes that <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> dryland crops and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

yield <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dryland crops by <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> some high yield<strong>in</strong>g drought tolerance varieties can be effective<br />

technological and policy <strong>in</strong>struments for slow<strong>in</strong>g down <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> land degradation and improve <strong>the</strong> welfare<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> farmers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> watershed. <strong>The</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> Kothapally watershed study should be useful to<br />

policymakers and o<strong>the</strong>rs seek<strong>in</strong>g to reduce poverty and improve land management <strong>in</strong> SAT regions <strong>of</strong> India. This<br />

model can also be used as a decision support tool to develop an optimum farm plan for different households <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> watershed with available resource without affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> natural resource base. Beyond this, <strong>the</strong> bioeconomic<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g approach used <strong>in</strong> this study can be usefully adapted and applied <strong>in</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>r sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Collaborat<strong>in</strong>g Institutions and Scientists:<br />

TNAU : K Palanisami, Nedumaran<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> : B Shiferaw, SP Wani, TK Sreedevi<br />

Priority 5C. Rural <strong>in</strong>stitutions and <strong>the</strong>ir governance<br />

Priority 5C, Specific goal 1: Identify mechanisms for <strong>the</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> producers’ organizations and for<br />

modes <strong>of</strong> participatory research<br />

Priority 5C, Specific goal 2: Identify new forms <strong>of</strong> partnerships with NARS, <strong>the</strong> private sector, public extension<br />

agencies, NGOs and producers’ organizations, and public agencies from o<strong>the</strong>r sectors, such as<br />

environment and health to enhance <strong>the</strong> conduct and impact from agricultural research<br />

Output 1E. Alternative <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>novations and topologies to streng<strong>the</strong>n rural <strong>in</strong>stitutions that<br />

facilitate and enhance adoption <strong>of</strong> technological and market <strong>in</strong>novations and policy recommendations for<br />

formal and <strong>in</strong>formal social networks to address vulnerability, gender and social exclusion <strong>in</strong> SAT farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems developed and shared by 2009. Developments shared annually with partners.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!