21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 9B11. Manure effects on <strong>the</strong> water use efficiencies at Bagoua <strong>in</strong> 2004. NM is no manure; TM is<br />

transported manure; and C1 is one year s<strong>in</strong>ce last corrall<strong>in</strong>g; TDM is total dry matter; and WUE is water use<br />

efficiency.<br />

Manure treatment Gra<strong>in</strong> yield TDM WUE (Gra<strong>in</strong>) WUE (TDM)<br />

kg ha -1 kg ha -1 kg ha -1 mm -1 kg ha -1 mm -1<br />

NM 482 ab 1715 ab 1.7 a 6.1 ac<br />

TM 721 bc 2910 cd 2.5 b 9.9 bc<br />

C0 1108 d 3400 e 3.8 c 11.7 d<br />

C1 847 c 2996 de 2.7 b 9.4 bc<br />

C 2 2 610 b 1875 b 2.2 a 6.7 c<br />

†Means followed by <strong>the</strong> same letter and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same column are not significantly different with LSD test at 5 %<br />

confidence level.<br />

‡WUE=Yield/ET<br />

9 B4. Watershed Interventions <strong>in</strong> Asia:<br />

i. Run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss from on-station watersheds at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Center, Patancheru<br />

P Pathak, SP Wani and R sudi<br />

[REF16]<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are two long term watershed trials located on two different soil types at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Center, Patancheru, Alfisols<br />

(RW2 Watershed) and Vertic Inceptisol (BW7 Watershed) that have <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g treatments:<br />

1. Crops and cropp<strong>in</strong>g system: Sole sorghum or Groundnut/ Pigeonpea <strong>in</strong>tercrop <strong>in</strong> rotation with sorghum<br />

2. Management: Farmers conventional tillage and fertilizer management practices -Flat land treatment and a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> improved practices that <strong>in</strong>cludes a Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) land treatment.<br />

Total annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall observed <strong>in</strong> 2005 was 1183 mm, with slight differences <strong>in</strong> seasonal ra<strong>in</strong>fall observed for <strong>the</strong><br />

two different soil types, due to differences <strong>in</strong> plant<strong>in</strong>g dates. <strong>The</strong> seasonal ra<strong>in</strong>fall and <strong>the</strong> hydrological responses <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> two soil types are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 9B12 for <strong>the</strong> Alfisol Watershed and 9B13 for <strong>the</strong> Vertic Inceptisol<br />

Watershed. Although <strong>the</strong>re was no significant difference <strong>in</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f between <strong>the</strong> two land management practices on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Alfisol, soil loss was significantly reduced under <strong>the</strong> BBF compared to flat land configuration, approximately<br />

28% (Table 9B12).<br />

Table 9B12 . Ra<strong>in</strong>fall, run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss from two land treatments at Alfisol (RW2) watershed, 2005.<br />

Parameters BBF Flat<br />

Seasonal Ra<strong>in</strong>fall (mm) 1096 1096<br />

Seasonal run<strong>of</strong>f (mm) 258 275<br />

Peak run<strong>of</strong>f rate (m -3 s -1 ha -1 ) 0.158 0.161<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f as % <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall 23.5 25.0<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f events 16 16<br />

Soil loss (t ha -1 ) 7.10 9.09<br />

<strong>The</strong> Vertic Inceptisol recorded fewer run <strong>of</strong>f events than <strong>the</strong> Alfisol, due to later plant<strong>in</strong>g date and <strong>the</strong> higher water<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>of</strong> this soil. <strong>The</strong> BBF treatment significantly reduced run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss compared to <strong>the</strong> flat<br />

treatments, by 40% and 60% respectively. Peak run<strong>of</strong>f rate which is responsible for flood<strong>in</strong>g and high soil loss was<br />

also significantly lower <strong>in</strong> BBF when compared with flat system<br />

342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!