21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 9B6.Yield <strong>of</strong> soybean and sunflower cultivars <strong>in</strong> Chitradurga district, Karnataka, India<br />

Soybean variety Yield (t ha -1 ) Sunflower variety Yield (t ha -1 )<br />

Treatment : T1<br />

Local 0.69 Local (Mahyco 17) 0.67<br />

Treatment : T2<br />

KHSB 2 0.80 PAC 336 1.09<br />

MAUS 2 0.83 GK 2002 1.12<br />

MACS 124 0.93 KBSH 41 0.97<br />

KBSH 44 0.95<br />

Mean 0.85 1.03<br />

Treatment : T3<br />

KHSB 2 1.19 PAC 336 1.62<br />

MAUS 2 1.20 GK 2002 1.79<br />

MACS 124 0.72 KBSH 41 1.67<br />

KBSH 44 1.69<br />

Mean 1.04 1.69<br />

% yield <strong>in</strong>crease due to cultivar 46 35<br />

% yield <strong>in</strong>crease due to<br />

management<br />

54 65<br />

Table 9B7Yield <strong>of</strong> maize (t ha -1 ) cultivars <strong>in</strong> Haveri district, Karnataka, India<br />

Watersheds<br />

Varieties<br />

Chikl<strong>in</strong>ganhalli Aremellapur Anchatagiri<br />

Treatment: T1<br />

Local (Cargil 900 M) 4.50 4.11 1.73<br />

Treatment: T2<br />

GK 3015 4.62 4.71 --<br />

Proagro 4642 4.71 3.34 2.08<br />

Monsanto – all rounder 4.22 4.56 --<br />

Seedree 740 5.00 -- --<br />

Mean 4.64 4.20 2.08<br />

Treatment: T3<br />

GK 3015 5.76 6.64 --<br />

Proagro 4642 5.80 5.79 4.83<br />

Monsanto – all rounder 5.30 5.90 --<br />

Seedree 740 6.20 -- --<br />

Mean 5.76 6.11 4.83<br />

% yield <strong>in</strong>crease due to cultivar 11 5 11<br />

% yield <strong>in</strong>crease due to<br />

management<br />

89 95 89<br />

9B. 3 Improv<strong>in</strong>g Water Productivity <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa<br />

I. Effect <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum tillage and mulch<strong>in</strong>g on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water content <strong>of</strong> clayey and sandy<br />

soils. Walter Mupangwa, Steve Twomlow, Sue Walker and Lewis Hove – <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Free State.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>fed smallholder agriculture <strong>in</strong> semi-arid areas <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa is subject to numerous constra<strong>in</strong>ts. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude low ra<strong>in</strong>fall with high spatial and temporal variability, and significant loss <strong>of</strong> soil water through evaporation.<br />

An experiment as been established at Matopos Research Station, Zimbabwe, to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> mulch<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum tillage on maize yield and soil water content. <strong>The</strong> experiment as been run for two years and set up at two<br />

sites: clay (Matopos Research Station fields) and sand (Lucydale fields) soils, <strong>in</strong> a 7 x 3 factorial comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

mulch rates (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 10 t ha -1 ) and tillage methods (plant<strong>in</strong>g bas<strong>in</strong>s, ripper t<strong>in</strong>e and conventional<br />

plough). Each treatment was replicated three times at each site <strong>in</strong> a split plot design. Maize residue was applied as<br />

mulch before tillage operations. Two maize varieties, a hybrid (SC 403) and an open poll<strong>in</strong>ated variety (ZM 421)<br />

338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!