21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Disease score (1-9 scale)<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Score92<br />

Score106<br />

LAD92<br />

LAD106<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

Leaf area damage (LAD) (%)<br />

0<br />

ICGV<br />

00068<br />

ICG<br />

13919<br />

ICGV<br />

00064<br />

ICGV<br />

99029<br />

ICGV<br />

01276<br />

ICGV<br />

00005<br />

ICGV<br />

87846<br />

ICGV<br />

01270<br />

ICGV<br />

86590<br />

ICGV<br />

37<br />

ICGV<br />

92267<br />

TMV 2<br />

0<br />

Genotypes<br />

Fig. 1. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> advanced groundnut breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for resistance to late leaf spot (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>,<br />

Patancheru, <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season)<br />

Rust: At 92 DAS, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 advanced groundnut l<strong>in</strong>es tested, eight l<strong>in</strong>es showed a disease score <strong>of</strong> 1 – 2 and LAD =<br />

0.3-1.7, and two l<strong>in</strong>es (ICGV 92267 and ICGS 37) showed moderate levels <strong>of</strong> resistance (rust score = 3.8 -4.2, and<br />

LAD = 18.3 – 20.0) as compared to <strong>the</strong> resistant check ICGV 86699 (rust score = 1.8 and LAD = 0.8) and<br />

susceptible check TMV 2 (rust score = 6.0 and LAD = 40.0) (Fig. 2). ICGV 00064 showed resistance to both rust<br />

and LLS.<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

ICGV<br />

01270<br />

ICGV<br />

00005<br />

Score92<br />

Score106<br />

LAD92<br />

LAD106<br />

ICGV<br />

00064<br />

Evaluat ion <strong>of</strong> advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es aga<strong>in</strong>st Rust<br />

ICGV<br />

87846<br />

ICGV<br />

01276<br />

ICGV<br />

86699<br />

ICGV<br />

99029<br />

Genot ypes<br />

ICGV<br />

00068<br />

ICGV<br />

86590<br />

ICGV<br />

92267<br />

ICGV 37 TMV 2<br />

10 0<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

Fig. 2. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> advanced groundnut breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for rust resistance (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru, <strong>2006</strong><br />

ra<strong>in</strong>y season).<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for resistance to LLS and rust: Six replicated yield trials (elite foliar<br />

diseases resistant groundnut varietal trial (Spanish bunch) (EFDRGVT - SB), elite foliar diseases resistant groundnut<br />

varietal trial (Virg<strong>in</strong>ia bunch) (EFDRGVT - VB), advanced foliar diseases resistant groundnut varietal trial (Spanish<br />

bunch) (AFDRGVT - SB), advanced foliar diseases resistant groundnut varietal trial (Virg<strong>in</strong>ia bunch) (AFDRGVT -<br />

VB), prelim<strong>in</strong>ary foliar diseases resistant groundnut varietal trial (Spanish bunch) (PFDRGVT - SB), and<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary foliar diseases resistant groundnut varietal trial (Virg<strong>in</strong>ia bunch) (PFDRGVT -VB); consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 101<br />

advance breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es were screened for resistance to rust and LLS <strong>in</strong> an experimental sick-plot conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculum bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fector-rows. Experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> a broad-bed-and-furrow (BBF) system with two<br />

replications. Size <strong>of</strong> each plot was 1.5 x 4 m, with <strong>in</strong>ter-row spac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 30 cm, and plant to plant spac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 10 cm<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a row. Chemical sprays were used to control <strong>in</strong>sect pests. At 45 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g, plots were <strong>in</strong>oculated by<br />

spray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected and test rows with mixed conidial suspension <strong>of</strong> P. personata and P. arachidis ured<strong>in</strong>iospores.<br />

After <strong>in</strong>oculation, perfo-irrigation was provided daily for 30 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g for 30 days to <strong>in</strong>crease humidity<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!