21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comparative performance <strong>of</strong> hybrids for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance: A trial <strong>of</strong> 30 hybrids along with three checks, viz,<br />

CSH 16, SP 40646 and ICSB 406 was conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season at <strong>the</strong> Agricultural Research Station<br />

(ARS), Gangavathi to ascerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance and gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> large gra<strong>in</strong> backgrounds. Among <strong>the</strong>m, 16<br />

hybrids with a gra<strong>in</strong> yield range <strong>of</strong> 4.8 to 6.0 t ha -1 were on par with <strong>the</strong> hybrid check CSH 16 (6.6 t ha -1 ). For gra<strong>in</strong><br />

size, 25 hybrids with a range <strong>of</strong> 2.76 to 3.56 g 100 -1 were comparable with <strong>the</strong> best check SP 40646 (3.22 g 100 -1 ) <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e soil (10 dS m -1 ) at ARS, Gangavathi.<br />

BVS Reddy<br />

Pot-culture trial <strong>of</strong> parental l<strong>in</strong>es and hybrids: A total <strong>of</strong> 38 parental l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> sorghum were tested for sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

tolerance, along with 34 hybrids. <strong>The</strong>re was a large variation among <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>the</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield ratio (gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />

sal<strong>in</strong>ity/gra<strong>in</strong> yield control) rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.022 to 0.536, which is a proxy for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

accessions tested appeared to have low ratio, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y were susceptible to sal<strong>in</strong>ity. Genotypes ICSB 405,<br />

ICSR 170, ICSR 93034, ICVS 93046, ICSV 745, GD 65115, SP 47513, SP 47519, SP 39105, SP 39053 had high<br />

ratios and were, <strong>the</strong>refore, tolerant to sal<strong>in</strong>ity. Regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> stover yield ratio (stover yield sal<strong>in</strong>ity/stover yield<br />

control), most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genotypes were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> range 0.40−0.80, show<strong>in</strong>g much less contrast than for yield. <strong>The</strong>re was<br />

no advantage <strong>of</strong> hybrids over parents <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> stover yield ratio, which was slightly higher for <strong>in</strong>breds than for<br />

hybrids (0.75). <strong>The</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield ratio was also higher for <strong>in</strong>bred parents (0.20) than for hybrids (0.13). <strong>The</strong> same was<br />

true for <strong>the</strong> absolute values <strong>of</strong> yield under sal<strong>in</strong>ity conditions, with average across parents be<strong>in</strong>g higher (8.4 g<br />

plant -1 ) than <strong>the</strong> hybrids (7.4 g plant -1 ). <strong>The</strong>refore, it was concluded that sorghum hybrids had no significant<br />

advantage compared to <strong>in</strong>breds under sal<strong>in</strong>e conditions.<br />

I. Sal<strong>in</strong>ity field trial <strong>of</strong> varieties: We tested promis<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity-tolerant sorghum breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> coastal Orissa.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a large range <strong>in</strong> adaptation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se genotypes to <strong>the</strong> area, and some varieties such as S 35, ICSV 112,<br />

ICSV 406, ICSR 170, ICSV 93034 were able to reach over 10 t/ha <strong>of</strong> green fodder yield <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e field over two<br />

cutt<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong>se data are very promis<strong>in</strong>g because it provides potential to have a crop grown after rice <strong>in</strong> a cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system that usually leaves lands fallow after rice harvest, mostly because sal<strong>in</strong>ity levels rise dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> postra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

season, which is too high for most crops. Repeat <strong>of</strong> this test<strong>in</strong>g is planned for <strong>2006</strong>−07.<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez, L Krishnamurthy and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Milestone 5B.1.1.2: New F 6 RIL mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance available for phenotyp<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

genotyp<strong>in</strong>g (CTH/BVSR/VV, 2009)<br />

From <strong>the</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> milestone <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es and parental l<strong>in</strong>es, several suitable parents have been selected and<br />

crosses will be made to develop new RIL for QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se crosses are:<br />

BTx 623 (tolerant) × ICSR 93024-1 (sensitive)<br />

ICSV 93046 (tolerant) × S 35 (sensitive)<br />

BTx 623 (tolerant) × S 35 (sensitive)<br />

SP 39105 (tolerant) × ICSR 93024-1 (sensitive).<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent Vadez and L Krishnamurthy<br />

Milestone 5B.1.1.3: QTLs for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance identified (VV/CTH, 2010)<br />

Sal<strong>in</strong>ity screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> parents <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g mapp<strong>in</strong>g populations <strong>of</strong> sorghum: Ten parents (BTx 623, IS 18551,<br />

296B, ICSV 745, PB 15881-3, PB 15520, B 35, E 36-1, N 13, IS 9830) were tested <strong>in</strong> 2005−06 for sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance<br />

to exam<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se could be used for QTL mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>ity tolerance. We found a good contrast for<br />

<strong>the</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield ratio between E 36-1 (0.39) and N 13 (0.13), and also between PB 15220 (0.45) and ICSV 745 (0.10).<br />

However, we did not detect any significant contrasts for <strong>the</strong> stover yield ratios among <strong>the</strong> available pairs <strong>of</strong> parental<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

V Vadez<br />

Output target 5B.2: Identification <strong>of</strong> sorghum genotypes with contrast<strong>in</strong>g root traits (2009)<br />

Activity 5B.2.1: Stay-green QTL <strong>in</strong>trogression l<strong>in</strong>es tested for root traits (VV/CTH, 2009)<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!