21.12.2013 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

ICRISAT Archival Report 2006 - The seedlings of success in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equired for disease development. Diseases (LLS and rust) were scored on a 1 - 9 rat<strong>in</strong>g scale (1 = highly resistant,<br />

and 9 = highly susceptible) at 89 and 105 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> LLS and rust was uniform throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fector rows, and 100% <strong>in</strong>fection was observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

susceptible controls. Highly significant differences were observed among <strong>the</strong> genotypes <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> trials aga<strong>in</strong>st LLS<br />

and rust. For all <strong>the</strong> trials, coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> 4 to 22% for LLS, and 5 to 15% for rust . Of<br />

101 breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es tested, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test l<strong>in</strong>es was resistant to LLS. Twenty-four l<strong>in</strong>es showed an overall disease<br />

severity score <strong>of</strong> 4.0. Ano<strong>the</strong>r 16 l<strong>in</strong>es had a score <strong>of</strong> 4.5, 29 l<strong>in</strong>es were scored 5.0, and 15 l<strong>in</strong>es rated as moderately<br />

resistant (score 5.5) (Table 1). Eighty-eight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es showed good resistance to rust (disease score <strong>of</strong> 2); 11<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es scored 2.5 to 3; and <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two l<strong>in</strong>es ICGV 05092 recorded 8.0 and ICGV 06160 scored as 6.5 at 105<br />

days after sow<strong>in</strong>g (Table 1).<br />

Table 1: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for late leaf spot and rust resistance (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru,<br />

<strong>2006</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y season)<br />

Disease severity rat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Trial<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es LLS<br />

Rust<br />

tested 1-3* 4-6* 7-9* 1-3* 4-6* 7-9*<br />

EFDRGVT (SB) 11 Nil 10 1 11 Nil Nil<br />

EFDRGVT (VB) 5 Nil 5 Nil 5 Nil Nil<br />

AFDRGVT (SB) 15 Nil 14 1 14 Nil 1<br />

AFDRGVT (VB) 16 Nil 16 Nil 16 Nil Nil<br />

PFDRGVT (SB) 28 Nil 24 4 27 Nil 1<br />

PFDRGVT (VB) 26 Nil 25 1 26 Nil Nil<br />

Total 101 Nil 94 7 99 Nil 2<br />

*Disease score on a 1 - 9 scale, where 1 = highly resistant, and 9 = highly susceptible for LLS and rust.<br />

Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary evaluation for resistance to foliar diseases: Two foliar disease-resistant groundnut variety (PFDRG -<br />

VT) trials consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 164 l<strong>in</strong>es were screened aga<strong>in</strong>st LLS and rust. Six l<strong>in</strong>es showed resistance to LLS with a<br />

score <strong>of</strong> 3.0, while 121 had a score <strong>of</strong> 4 - 6. For rust, 137 l<strong>in</strong>es showed high levels <strong>of</strong> resistance (disease score 2.0).<br />

<strong>The</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es had a score <strong>of</strong> >3.0 on a 1 - 9 scale.<br />

Farid Waliyar, Lava Kumar, SN Nigam and R Aruna<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> F 2 to F 6 populations for resistance to LLS and rust under field conditions: Five breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

populations (F 2 to F 6 , 118 l<strong>in</strong>es) were evaluated for resistance to LLS and rust under field conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>2006</strong><br />

ra<strong>in</strong>y season <strong>in</strong> an un-replicated, 9 m row plot, with 60 cm <strong>in</strong>ter-row spac<strong>in</strong>g, and 10 cm distance between <strong>the</strong> plants.<br />

TMV 2, a highly susceptible cultivar to both LLS and rust, was sown <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fector rows after every five test rows.<br />

Forty-five days after sow<strong>in</strong>g, plots were <strong>in</strong>oculated by spray<strong>in</strong>g 30 L <strong>of</strong> mixed suspension <strong>of</strong> P. personata conidia<br />

and P. arachidis ured<strong>in</strong>iospores. One day after <strong>in</strong>oculation, perfo-irrigation was provided daily for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

even<strong>in</strong>g up to 30 days to favor disease development. All <strong>the</strong> populations were evaluated on a 1 - 9 rat<strong>in</strong>g scale for<br />

reaction to foliar disease at harvest. <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> LLS was uniform throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fector rows. <strong>The</strong><br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g populations were categorized as resistant (disease score 1 - 3), moderately resistant (disease score 4 - 6)<br />

and susceptible (disease score 7 - 9). A few s<strong>in</strong>gle plants from F 6 population showed moderate levels <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />

to LLS.<br />

Farid Waliyar, Lava Kumar, SN Nigam and R Aruna<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es for resistance to Aspergillus flavus <strong>in</strong>fection and aflatox<strong>in</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation:<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2005 post-ra<strong>in</strong>y season, 106 advanced breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es were evaluated for resistance to Aspergillus flavus<br />

seed <strong>in</strong>fection and aflatox<strong>in</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation. <strong>The</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es were planted <strong>in</strong> five separate trials <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> A. flavus<br />

sick plot. <strong>The</strong> fungal <strong>in</strong>oculum multiplied on sorghum and maize gra<strong>in</strong>s was applied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil at two-weekly<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervals dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> crop growth period, and end <strong>of</strong> season drought stress was imposed 30 days before harvest to<br />

facilitate seed <strong>in</strong>fection. Harvest<strong>in</strong>g was done manually and pods were sun dried for 2 - 3 days. Pods from each plot<br />

were collected separately, shelled manually and kernel sub-samples were analyzed for A. flavus seed <strong>in</strong>fection by<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!