16.12.2012 Views

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

No significant difference between citalopram and placebo arms was seen in measures of<br />

repetitive behavior, with similar baseline scores on the <strong>Children</strong>’s Yale-Brown Obsessive<br />

Compulsive Scale-PDD version (15.1 vs. 15.0) and similar improvements (2.0 vs. 1.9) in each<br />

arm. The other measures of repetitive behavior, including the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised,<br />

also showed similar baseline scores and similar improvements in each arm with no evidence <strong>for</strong><br />

an effect of citalopram (Table 18). 222 The CGI-Improvement similarly showed no significant<br />

difference between the citalopram and the placebo arm. On the other hand, the primary measure<br />

of challenging behavior reported in this trial, the ABC-C Irritability subscale, showed an<br />

advantage <strong>for</strong> citalopram.<br />

The baseline ratings were not statistically different between the citalopram and placebo arms<br />

(13.2 and 11.2, respectively), but more improvement was seen <strong>for</strong> citalopram (3.2) than <strong>for</strong><br />

placebo (0.9). 222 Adverse effects in this study included a marked increase in what were termed<br />

“activation” symptoms, including increased energy, hyperactivity, inattention, disinhibition, and<br />

decreased sleep in the citalopram arm in comparison to the placebo arm. 222 Diarrhea and dry or<br />

itchy skin were also more common in the citalopram arm. 222<br />

Table 18. Outcomes of studies of SRIs <strong>for</strong> the treatment of repetitive and challenging behaviors in<br />

ASDs<br />

Author, year,<br />

country<br />

Study quality<br />

King et al. 222<br />

2009, US<br />

Quality: Good<br />

Hollander et al. 220<br />

2005, US<br />

Quality: Fair<br />

Groups, N<br />

enrollment/N<br />

final<br />

G1:citalopram<br />

hydrobromide,<br />

73/60<br />

G2:placebo,<br />

76/63<br />

G1a:placebo<br />

/fluoxetine,<br />

placebo<br />

segment<br />

45(total)/20<br />

G1b:placebo/<br />

fluoxetine,<br />

fluoxetine<br />

segment<br />

45(total)/20<br />

G2a:fluoxetine/p<br />

lacebo,<br />

fluoxetine<br />

segment<br />

45(total)/19<br />

G2a:fluoxetine/p<br />

lacebo, placebo<br />

segment<br />

Mean<br />

age,<br />

years ±<br />

SD<br />

G1: 9.1 ±<br />

3.2<br />

G2: 9.6 ±<br />

3.1<br />

7.35<br />

SD - NR<br />

Mean IQ ±<br />

SD<br />

G1:<br />

>70, N (%):<br />

43(61.4)<br />

G2:<br />

>70, N (%):<br />

43(60.6)<br />

68<br />

Outcome<br />

measure/Baseline<br />

scores, mean ± SD<br />

CYBOCS-PDD:<br />

G1:15.1 ± 1.8<br />

G2: 15 ± 2.1<br />

68.1 ± 26.7 CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 0: 13.5 ± 2.9<br />

7.35 68.1 ± 26.7 CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 12: 12.9 ± 3.5<br />

9.1±3.7<br />

9.1±3.7<br />

59.2 ± 29.1 CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 0: 12.8 ± 2.6<br />

59.2 ± 29.1 CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 12: 12.2 ± 3.5<br />

Outcome<br />

measure/Posttreatment<br />

scores a ,<br />

mean ± SD<br />

CYBOCS-PDD:<br />

G1: 13.1 ± 3.7<br />

G2: 13.1 ± 3.2<br />

CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 8: 13.0 ± 3.2<br />

CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 20: 11.8 ± 3.2<br />

P0.05 <strong>for</strong> parallel<br />

group comparison of<br />

G2a to G1a<br />

CYBOCS:<br />

Wk 20: 12.4 ± 2.4<br />

45(total)/19<br />

a<br />

Decrease in scores on outcome measure indicates improvement in behavior assessed. ABC-C=Aberrant Behavior Checklist-<br />

Community Version; CYBOCS=<strong>Children</strong>’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; CYBOCS-PDD=<strong>Children</strong>’s Yale-Brown<br />

Obsessive Compulsive Scale-Pervasive Development <strong>Disorders</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!