16.12.2012 Views

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evidence Table. <strong>Therapies</strong> <strong>for</strong> children with ASD<br />

Study<br />

Inclusion/Exclusion Baseline<br />

Description Intervention<br />

Criteria/Population Measures Outcomes<br />

Legoff and Occupational therapy: Diagnostic tool/method:<br />

PIQ, mean ± SD:<br />

Sherman, 2006 G1: 1.24 ± 0.89<br />

Diagnosis made on basis<br />

G1: 99.3 ± 16.8<br />

(continued) G2: 1.19 ± 0.88<br />

of comprehensive<br />

G2: 90.3 ± 18.1<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

evaluations by a pediatric<br />

Harms:<br />

Physical therapy: neuropsychologist, a child<br />

NR<br />

G1: 0.21 ± 1.17<br />

psychiatrist, a child<br />

Modifiers:<br />

G2: 0.57 ± 1.31<br />

psychologist, and a speech<br />

No main effect or<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

pathologist, all of whom<br />

interaction effect<br />

Psychiatric medications, n were specialists in autism<br />

<strong>for</strong> diagnostic<br />

(%):<br />

spectrum disorders<br />

group (G1a, G1b,<br />

Antipsychotics:<br />

Diagnostic category, n<br />

G2a, G2b) <strong>for</strong><br />

G1: 14 (23.3)<br />

(%):<br />

VABS-SD or<br />

G2: 15 (26.3)<br />

<strong>Autism</strong>:<br />

GARS-SI<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

G1: 26 (43.3)<br />

In the autistic<br />

Psychostimulants: G2: 24 (42.1)<br />

disorder group,<br />

G1: 18 (30.0)<br />

Asperger’s:<br />

GARS-SI<br />

G2: 17 (29.8)<br />

G1: 27 (45.0)<br />

outcome was<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

G2: 28 (49.1)<br />

significantly<br />

SSRI:<br />

PDD-NOS:<br />

correlated with<br />

G1: 9 (15.0)<br />

G1: 7 (11.7)<br />

initial VABS-CD<br />

G2: 8 (14.0)<br />

G2: PDD-NOS: 5 (8.7)<br />

and VIQ scores (P<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

Other characteristics, n<br />

< 0.05) and this<br />

N at enrollment: (%):<br />

relationship was<br />

G1: 60<br />

Diagnosis, axis II:<br />

found in both the<br />

G1a: 26<br />

No diagnosis:<br />

LEGO and<br />

G1b: 34<br />

G1: 41 (68.3)<br />

comparison<br />

G2: 57<br />

G2: 39 (68.4)<br />

groups<br />

G2a: 24<br />

Mild MR:<br />

Communication<br />

G2b: 33<br />

G1: 16 (26.7)<br />

ability (measured<br />

N at follow-up:<br />

G2: 15 (26.3)<br />

by the VABS-CD<br />

G1: 60<br />

Moderate MR:<br />

and VIQ) was<br />

G1a: 26<br />

G1: 2 (3.3)<br />

significantly<br />

G1b: 34<br />

G2: 3 (5.3)<br />

correlated with<br />

G2: 57<br />

MR unspecified:<br />

outcome on the<br />

G2a: 24<br />

G1: 1 (1.7)<br />

VABS-CD <strong>for</strong> both<br />

G2b: 33<br />

G2: 0 (0.0)<br />

LEGO (P < 0.02)<br />

and comparison<br />

participants (P <<br />

0.01)<br />

Legoff and<br />

Regression<br />

Sherman, 2006<br />

analyses of<br />

(continued)<br />

VABS-CD and<br />

VIQ predicting<br />

VABS-SD<br />

difference scores:<br />

G1+G2: P < 0.01<br />

G1: P < 0.001<br />

G2: P < 0.004<br />

Ga: P = NS<br />

Gb: P < 0.001<br />

G1a: P < 0.021<br />

G1b: P < 0.019<br />

G2a: P = NS.<br />

G2b: P < 0.004<br />

Regression<br />

analyses of<br />

VABS-CD and<br />

C-282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!