16.12.2012 Views

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evidence Table. <strong>Therapies</strong> <strong>for</strong> children with ASD (continued)<br />

Study<br />

Inclusion/ Exclusion Baseline<br />

Description Intervention<br />

Criteria/ Population Measures Outcomes<br />

relationship first author<br />

Male:<br />

academic SD:<br />

disclosures: BSID-R or WPPSI-R G1: 19<br />

attainment: G1: 68.4 ± 14.5<br />

3 of 5†<br />

(depending on<br />

G2: 15<br />

IQ, mean ± SD: G2: 72.5 ± 17.3<br />

NOVA Institute <strong>for</strong> chronological age), Female:<br />

G1: 53.5 ± 15.1 G1/G2: P = NS<br />

<strong>Children</strong> with Merrill-Palmer Scale of G1: 4<br />

G2: 54.1 ± 15.1 G1+G2/BL: P <<br />

Developmental Mental Tests, RDLS, and G2: 6<br />

G1/G2: P = NS 0.001<br />

<strong>Disorders</strong> (1) VABS conducted by an Race/ethnicity:<br />

Visual-spatial IQ, Educational/<br />

UK YAP (3) independent psychologist NR<br />

mean ± SD: cognitive/<br />

Design: Groups:<br />

SES:<br />

G1: 74.8 ± 22.6 academic<br />

Prospective cohort G1: clinic based ABA Maternal education: NR G2: 76.2 ± 18.2 attainment:<br />

study<br />

G2: parent managed ABA Household income: NR G1/G2: P = NS IQ, mean ± SD:<br />

Retrospective<br />

Diagnostic approach:<br />

G1: 70.9 ± 19.6<br />

case series Provider:<br />

Referral, confirmed in<br />

G2: 68.9 ± 22.1<br />

(subgroup Clinic-based:<br />

study<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

analysis)† • Tutors: received basic Diagnostic tool/method:<br />

G1+G2/BL: P <<br />

and advanced theory Confirmed by ADI-R<br />

0.001<br />

seminars, a 60-hour Diagnostic category:<br />

Visual-spatial IQ,<br />

practicum, continued NR<br />

mean ± SD:<br />

training and supervision Other characteristics:<br />

G1: 89.4 ± 29.2<br />

from senior tutor and NR<br />

G2: 82.1 ± 28.0<br />

program consultant<br />

G1/G2: P = NS<br />

• Senior tutor: ≥ 1 year<br />

G1+G2/BL: P <<br />

experience working as<br />

0.001<br />

a tutor with > 3 children<br />

Harms:<br />

• Program consultant:<br />

≥ 3 years clinical<br />

experience as both<br />

tutor and senior tutor<br />

NR<br />

Hayward et al., Parent-based:<br />

Modifiers:<br />

2009<br />

• Parents were super-<br />

Visual-spatial IQ<br />

(continued) vised <strong>for</strong> > 6 hours<br />

at intake was<br />

every 6 weeks by<br />

significantly<br />

program consultant<br />

correlated with<br />

from clinic-based<br />

change in VABS<br />

program<br />

composite score<br />

Measure of treatment<br />

at 1 year (r =<br />

fidelity reported:<br />

0.64; P < 0.01)<br />

Yes<br />

and change in IQ<br />

Co-interventions held<br />

at 1 year (r =<br />

stable during treatment:<br />

0.38; P < 0.05)<br />

Yes<br />

In G2, intensity of<br />

Concomitant therapies:<br />

supervision was<br />

NR<br />

significantly<br />

N at enrollment:<br />

correlated with<br />

G1: 23<br />

change in IQ at 14<br />

G2: 21<br />

month follow-up (r<br />

N at follow-up:<br />

= 0.45; P < 0.05);<br />

G1: 23<br />

estimated linear<br />

G2: 21<br />

regression line<br />

G2: 19†<br />

has slope of 0.210<br />

(P < 0.05)†<br />

In G2, visualspatial<br />

IQ at<br />

intake was<br />

significantly<br />

correlated with<br />

change in IQ at 14<br />

C-45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!