16.12.2012 Views

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evidence Table. <strong>Therapies</strong> <strong>for</strong> children with ASD<br />

Study<br />

Inclusion/Exclusion Baseline<br />

Description Intervention<br />

Criteria/Population Measures Outcomes<br />

Author:<br />

Inclusion criteria: Educational/ Educational/<br />

Eikeseth et al., Intervention:<br />

• Age 4-7 years at intake cognitive: cognitive:<br />

2002<br />

Eikeseth et al.,<br />

2007†<br />

Behavioral treatment:<br />

Lovaas treatment<br />

excluding aversive<br />

• Diagnosed with autism<br />

according to ADI-R<br />

administered by child<br />

IQ, mean ± SD:<br />

G1: 61.92 ± 11.31<br />

G2: 65.17 ± 14.97<br />

IQ, mean ± SD:<br />

1 year:<br />

G1: 79.08 ± 18.09<br />

Country: contingencies;<br />

clinical psychologist and PIQ, mean ± SD: G2: 69.5 ± 18.38<br />

Norway<br />

progression from simple clinical interview G1: 77.54 ± 30.21 G1/G2: P < 0.01<br />

Practice to complex tasks such as • Diagnosis established G2: 81.83 ± 21.05 8 years:†<br />

setting:<br />

imitating verbal and less than 6 months prior Communication/ G1: 86.9 ± 25<br />

Academic nonverbal behavior, to study entrance <strong>for</strong> all language: G2: 71.9 ± 28.4<br />

Intervention labeling objects,<br />

participants<br />

Language status, G1/G2: P < 0.05<br />

setting:<br />

identifying actions, and • Deviation IQ of 50 or mean ± SD: PIQ, 1 year, mean<br />

School<br />

abstract concepts. above on WPPSI-R or Comprehension: ± SD:<br />

Enrollment Progression to answering ratio IQ of 50 or above G1: 49.03 ± 16.42 G1: 95 ± 16.91<br />

period:<br />

questions, conversing and on BSID-R<br />

G2: 50.38 ± 15.46 G2: 90.17 ± 19.97<br />

November 1995 to making friends with peers. • No major medical Expressive: Communication/<br />

November 1998 Also emphasized play and conditions<br />

G1: 45.12 ± 13.44 language:<br />

Funding: social skills. Based on Exclusion criteria: G2: 51.24 ± 19.24 Language status,<br />

NIH†<br />

operant conditioning<br />

• See inclusion criteria Total:<br />

1 year, mean ±<br />

Author industry principles such as Age, months ± SD: G1: 51.83 ± 17.42 SD:<br />

relationship shaping, chaining, G1: 66.31 ± 11.31 G2: 60.00 ± 24.22 Comprehension:<br />

disclosures: discrimination training, G2: 65 ± 10.95<br />

VABS communi- G1: 58.47 ± 17.11<br />

NR<br />

and contingency Mental age:<br />

cation score, mean G2: 47.55 ± 17.25<br />

Design: management. Progressed<br />

See IQ scores in baseline ± SD:<br />

G1/G2: P < 0.05<br />

Non randomized from discrete trial to<br />

measures<br />

G1: 58.23 ± 9.21 Expressive:<br />

controlled trial generalizing skills. Gender, n (%):<br />

G2: 63.17 ± 16.11 G1: 67.39 ± 17.81<br />

Eclectic treatment:<br />

Male:<br />

Adaptive behavior: G2: 49 ± 18.69<br />

best practices, including G1: 8 (62)<br />

VABS daily living G1/G2: P < 0.05<br />

TEACCH, sensory-motor G2: 11 (92)<br />

score, mean ± SD: Total:<br />

therapies, and ABA<br />

Female:<br />

G1: 56.92 ± 9.8 G1: 76.85 ± 26.67<br />

Treatment hours, mean ± G1: 5 (38)<br />

G2: 57.00 ± 15.92 G2: 61.58 ± 24.34<br />

SD (range):<br />

G2: 1 (8)<br />

VABS composite G1/G2: P < 0.05<br />

G1: 28 ± 5.76 (20-35)<br />

Race/ethnicity:<br />

score, mean ± SD: VABS communi-<br />

G2: 29.08 ± 8.05 (20-41)<br />

NR<br />

G1: 55.77 ± 8.96 cation score,<br />

Assessments:<br />

SES:<br />

G2: 60.00 ± 13.2 mean ± SD:<br />

ADI-R administered by<br />

Maternal education: NR<br />

Social skills:* 1 year:<br />

independent child clinical<br />

Household income: NR<br />

VABS socialization G1: 73.93 ± 16.55<br />

psychologist prior to study Diagnostic approach: score, mean ± SD: G2: 61.58 ± 13.37<br />

Weekly, 2-hour meetings<br />

In Study<br />

G1: 59.92 ± 7.19 G1/G2: P < 0.01<br />

with child, primary Diagnostic tool/method:<br />

G2: 62.17 ± 10.32 8 years:†<br />

caregiver, therapists, ADI-R and clinical interview<br />

G1: 78.5 ± 22.3<br />

supervisor, and director;<br />

conducted by clinical<br />

G2: 56 ± 16.3<br />

treatment program was psychologist independent<br />

G1/G2: P < 0.01<br />

modified based on data of the investigation<br />

Adaptive<br />

collected during the Diagnostic category, n<br />

behavior:<br />

preceding week (%):<br />

VABS daily living<br />

<strong>Autism</strong>: 25 (100)<br />

score, mean ±<br />

Other characteristics:<br />

SD:<br />

NR<br />

1 year:<br />

G1: 66.15 ± 16.55<br />

G2: 62.5 ± 10.97<br />

Eikeseth et al., Child assessed at intake<br />

8 years:†<br />

2002<br />

and 1 year after treatment<br />

G1: 66.1 ± 18.1<br />

Eikeseth et al., began (follow-up<br />

G2: 50.4 ± 20.2<br />

2007† (continued) conducted by licensed<br />

G1/G2: P < 0.05<br />

psychologist or examiner<br />

VABS composite<br />

with Master’s in Special<br />

score, mean ±<br />

C-207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!