16.12.2012 Views

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One prospective case series of escitalopram was identified. 223 This ten-week study sought to<br />

identify pharmacogenetic modifiers of treatment response in the challenging behavior domain as<br />

measured by the ABC-C-Irritability. Fifty-eight subjects with a PDD corroborated by ADI-R and<br />

a minimum ABC-C-I score of 12 underwent a <strong>for</strong>ced dose titration of escitalopram from 2.5 mg<br />

daily increasing weekly to 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg, essentially twice the dose equivalent<br />

of citalopram given that escitalopram is the active component of racemic citalopram. Predesignated<br />

dose-limiting side effects included sleep disruption and an increase in ABC-C<br />

Irritability or Hyperactivity subscales of ten points over the previous week. Average daily doses<br />

of escitalopram were 10.8-12.4 mg and did not differ across genotype groups, which reflects the<br />

fact that most subjects in all genotype groups could not tolerate the maximum dose.<br />

Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, the data are presented in figures only, and raw values cannot be inferred. It is<br />

evident, however, that the ABC-C-Irritability <strong>for</strong> all subjects was 20 or greater at baseline and<br />

that improvements were about ten points <strong>for</strong> three of the four genotype groups. 223 Adverse<br />

effects were not directly assessed in this study.<br />

One randomized, controlled crossover trial of fluoxetine was identified with two eight-week<br />

treatment periods separated by a four-week washout period. 220 Thirty-nine subjects with a PDD<br />

corroborated with ADI-R and ADOS were included in the final analysis with no minimum<br />

required score on a repetitive behavior scale. Five additional subjects were randomized but not<br />

included in the analysis <strong>for</strong> various reasons. Of the randomized subjects, 19 received fluoxetine<br />

followed by placebo and 20 received placebo followed by fluoxetine. During each phase of the<br />

study, subjects began the first week at 2.5 mg per day of fluoxetine or placebo, followed as<br />

clinically indicated by weekly upward titration to 0.3 mg/kg <strong>for</strong> week 2, 0.5 mg/kg/day <strong>for</strong> week<br />

3, and 0.8 mg/kg/day <strong>for</strong> weeks four to eight. During the first eight-week treatment period of the<br />

study, subjects randomized to fluoxetine first had baseline <strong>Children</strong>’s Yale-Brown Obsessive<br />

Compulsive Scale scores of 12.8 and those to placebo first had baseline scores of 13.5.<br />

Subjects in the first fluoxetine group showed an improvement of 1.2, and those in the first<br />

placebo arm showed an improvement of 0.5. These differences were not statistically significant<br />

when considered alone. In the second eight-week treatment period, subjects randomized to<br />

fluoxetine second had baseline <strong>Children</strong>’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores of<br />

12.8 and those to placebo second had baseline scores of 12.2. Subjects in the second fluoxetine<br />

arm showed an improvement of 1.2, and those in the second placebo arm showed a worsening of<br />

0.1. When analyzed together with the first treatment period in a repeated measures design, the<br />

<strong>Children</strong>’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale change in the fluoxetine arms was<br />

significantly greater than the change in the placebo arms. No adverse events were significantly<br />

more frequent in the fluoxetine group; although more subjects on fluoxetine had their dose<br />

reduced due to agitation. 220 The two chart reviews of SRIs 221,224 reported in the literature were of<br />

poor quality and included general outcome measures that are difficult to compare with the RCT<br />

data.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!