16.12.2012 Views

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evidence Table. <strong>Therapies</strong> <strong>for</strong> children with ASD (continued)<br />

Study<br />

Inclusion/ Exclusion Baseline<br />

Description Intervention<br />

Criteria/ Population Measures Outcomes<br />

Johnson and exposure to the drug. The depressants except rated, mean ± SD G2: 20.85 ± 13.01<br />

Johnson (2) 4 pm dose could be fluoxetine and citalopram (range):†<br />

G3: 19.27 ± 14.23<br />

Lilly (5)<br />

dropped by the<br />

hydrobromide; 3 weeks Irritability:<br />

G4: 25.09 ± 15.55<br />

McNeil (1) prescribing clinician to <strong>for</strong> fluoxetine, citalopram 16.9 ± 10.1 (0-41) G5: 18.59 ± 12.03<br />

Merck (1) reduce insomnia if it hydrobromide, or Lethargy/social G1/G5: P < 0.05<br />

Novartis (2) occurred.<br />

antipsychotics) withdrawal: G2/G5: P = NS<br />

Pediamed (2) 3 daily doses admini- • Mental age of ≥ 18 12.1 ± 8.9 (0-33) G3/G5: P = NS<br />

Pfizer (3) stered at 8 am, 12 pm, months as determined Stereotypy: G4/G5: P < 0.05<br />

Shire (2) and 4 pm, respectively; by intelligence testing 7.6 ± 5.9 (0-21) Responses:<br />

UCB (1)<br />

Wyeth (2)<br />

dosage (mg) by weight:<br />

16 to < 24 kg (n=29):<br />

Low: 2.5, 2.5, 2.5<br />

Medium: 5.0, 5.0, 2.5<br />

High: 10.0, 10.0, 5.0<br />

24-34 kg (n=20):<br />

Low: 5.0, 5.0, 2.5<br />

Medium: 10.0, 10.0, 5.0<br />

High: 15.0, 15.0, 10.0<br />

• No other neuro- Hyperactivity: G1: 2.48 ± 1.45<br />

psychiatric disorders that 33.2 ± 8.7 (2-47) G2: 1.69 ± 1.42<br />

might require alternative Inappropriate G3: 1.93 ± 1.48<br />

medical management speech:<br />

G4: 2.24 ± 1.69<br />

• For those with a tic 6.0 ± 4.1 (0-12) G5: 1.90 ± 1.71<br />

disorder, severity had to ABC score, teacher- G1/G5: P < 0.01<br />

be mild or less on a CGIrated, mean ± SD G2/G5: P = NS<br />

severity subscale rating (range):†<br />

G3/G5: P = NS<br />

pertaining to tics only Irritability:<br />

G4/G5: P = NS<br />

16.1 ± 9.4 (0-43)<br />

Posey et al., > 34 kg (n=17):<br />

• No significant medical Lethargy/social Requesting:<br />

2007*<br />

Low: 5.0, 5.0, 2.5<br />

conditions (e.g., heart or withdrawal: G1: 4.04 ± 2.25<br />

Jahromi et al., Medium: 10.0, 10.0, 5.0 liver disease) that could 15.5 ± 10.9 (0-42) G2: 3.81 ± 2.65<br />

2009^<br />

High: 20.0, 20.0, 10.0 make treatment with Stereotypy: G3: 3.69 ± 3.27<br />

(continued) Intervention, open label methylphenidate unsafe 7.6 ± 5.1 (0-19) G4: 4.13 ± 2.58<br />

7 of 15^<br />

Bristol-Myers<br />

Squibb (6)<br />

Forest (3)<br />

Jannssen (4)<br />

extension phase: • For those with seizure<br />

Participants meeting the disorder, no seizures in<br />

criteria <strong>for</strong> positive the past 6 months and<br />

response during ≥ 1 week stable anticonvulsant<br />

in the crossover phase dose <strong>for</strong> ≥ 1 month<br />

Hyperactivity:<br />

30.9 ± 7.9 (16-45)<br />

Inappropriate<br />

speech:<br />

5.8 ± 3.6 (0-12)<br />

G5: 3.67 ± 2.40<br />

G1/G5: P = NS<br />

G2/G5: P = NS<br />

G3/G5: P = NS<br />

G4/G5: P = NS<br />

Lilly (4)<br />

underwent best-dose • No hypertension SNAP-IV, parent- Competing<br />

McNeil (3) determination with respect • No treatment with an rated, mean ± SD:* demands task<br />

Neuropharm (3) to the ABC hyperactivity adequate trial of methyl- ADHD:<br />

(n=33), mean ±<br />

Novartis (2) subscale. If positive phenidate hydrochloride 39.82 ± 8.09 SD:<br />

Organon (1) response during 1 week (0.4 mg/kg per dose Inattention: Self-regulating<br />

Pfizer (1) only, that dose was given at least twice daily 20.21 ± 5.17 behavior:<br />

Shire (3) labeled best dose; if <strong>for</strong> ≥ 2 weeks) within the Hyperactivity/ G1: 19.77 ± 10.89<br />

Supernus (2) subject responded during past 2 years<br />

impulsivity: G2: 16.21 ± 9.03<br />

UCB (1)<br />

more than 1 week of • No history of severe 19.61 ± 4.22 G3: 15.80 ± 12.65<br />

Wyeth (1) treatment, the prescribing adverse response to Oppositional defiant G4: 16.47 ± 13.91<br />

Design: and rating clinicians methylphenidate disorder:<br />

G5: 12.47 ± 11.29<br />

Randomized ranked the weeks of Exclusion criteria: 9.61 ± 6.19 G1/G5: P = 0.09<br />

crossover trial with response in order from<br />

• See inclusion criteria SNAP-IV, teacher- G2/G5: P < 0.01<br />

open label best to worst, then the Age, yrs ± SD (range): rated, mean ± SD:* G3/G5: P = NS<br />

extension phase prescribing physician<br />

7.5 ± 2.2 (5.0-13.7)<br />

ADHD:<br />

G4/G5: P = 0.09<br />

broke the blind <strong>for</strong> this Mental age, children 37.23 ± 7.04 Regulated<br />

best dose. If this best/ completing social Inattention: affective state:<br />

optimal dose was observation and 19.30 ± 4.32 G1: 12.91 ± 4.98<br />

methylphenidate, the regulation substudy, Hyperactivity/ G2: 12.96 ± 3.85<br />

participant entered the months ± SD (range): impulsivity: G3: 11.67 ± 5.53<br />

continuation phase. 43.91 ± 19.72 (20-84) 17.93 ± 4.81 G4: 12.47 ± 4.99<br />

Participants with no Gender, n (%):<br />

Oppositional defiant G5: 9.57 ± 6.72<br />

response at any week and<br />

Male: 59 (89.4)<br />

disorder:<br />

G1/G5: P = NS<br />

those responding best to<br />

Female: 7 (10.6)<br />

8.83 ± 5.19 G2/G5: P < 0.05<br />

placebo exited the study. Race/ethnicity, n (%): CYBOCS-PDD, G3/G5: P < 0.05<br />

Assessments:<br />

White: 48 (72.7)<br />

clinician-rated, G4/G5: P = 0.09<br />

CGI rated by clinician at<br />

African American: 9 (13.6) mean ± SD:* Clean-up task<br />

each weekly visit;<br />

Asian: 6 (9.1)<br />

13.30 ± 3.74 (n=33), mean ±<br />

C-52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!