09.01.2013 Views

Zeus : a study in ancient religion - Warburg Institute

Zeus : a study in ancient religion - Warburg Institute

Zeus : a study in ancient religion - Warburg Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The double axe and the labaru?n 607<br />

discussed. Gibbon' long s<strong>in</strong>ce noted 'the efforts of the critics, who<br />

have <strong>in</strong>effectually tortured the Lat<strong>in</strong>, Greek, Spanish, Celtic, Teu-<br />

tonic, Illyric, Armenian, &c. <strong>in</strong> search of an etymology.' And E.<br />

Venables- as late as 1908 declared it to be 'most probably of Basque<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>'! Meantime <strong>in</strong> 1903 E. Conybeare^ had solved the problem:<br />

a modest foot-note <strong>in</strong> his Roman Brita<strong>in</strong> puts the matter <strong>in</strong> a nutshell—<br />

' The Sacred Monogram known as Labaruni. Both name and<br />

emblem were very possibly adapted from the primitive cult of the<br />

Labrys, or Double Axe, filtered through Mithraism.' The value of<br />

this acute suggestion obviously depends on the possibility of cit<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

not merel)^ isolated examples of the Constant<strong>in</strong>ian monogram from<br />

dates prior to that of Constant<strong>in</strong>e^ but rather a connected series of<br />

formal l<strong>in</strong>ks between the labrys and labar<strong>in</strong>n. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> 1908<br />

I published the follow<strong>in</strong>g diagram (fig. 510)^ which <strong>in</strong>serts a series of<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate symbols taken <strong>in</strong> chronological order from the co<strong>in</strong>age<br />

of the Graeco-Scythian k<strong>in</strong>gs {s. iii— i B.C.). E. Rapp" had already<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1866 brought these symbols <strong>in</strong>to connexion with the labarnm,<br />

though not with the labrys, and had assumed that they were solar<br />

'" In Euseb. v. Const, <strong>in</strong>d. p. 5, 4 f. Heikel Xa'. "EK^pacrts aravpoeLSovs crrifxeiov, owep<br />

vxjv 01 "Pw/j.a2oi Xd^apov KaXovcnv codd. T.V. read Xd^opov, but V^ has a over the first 0.<br />

A Lat<strong>in</strong> form with is attested by Greg. Naz. or. 4 (confra lulianum i). 66 (xxxv.<br />

588 A—B Migne) roXfia Be ijdt] koL Kara tou /uLeydXov crvvd-qixaTO's, 6 fierd rod aroLvpov<br />

wo/xirevei, Kal ayei rbv arpaTov eis v\pos alpd/nevov, KafxaToiv XvrijpLOv 6v re Kai Kara. 'Vwfj.alovs<br />

ovofxtx^ofievou Kal (SaaiXevov, ws hv dwoi. tis, tQv Xonruiv avvdrifidTwu ' k.t.X. And Ducange<br />

/oc. cit. quotes lahorum for labariim from sundry late sources. In cod. Theod. 6. 25 de<br />

praepositis laborum (=cod. lust<strong>in</strong>. 12. 18) qui...praepositi laborum nostro iudicio et<br />

stipendiorum sudoribus promoventur the manuscripts' read<strong>in</strong>g laboriiiu has been defended<br />

by the fifth-century carmen de lona (formerly ascribed to Tertullian) 40 f. palpitat antemna<br />

stridens, labor horret ab alto, |<br />

ipsa<br />

etiam <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gi dubitans <strong>in</strong>flectitur arbor. But <strong>in</strong> cod.<br />

Theod. we should probably read the gen. plur. laboroi-um and <strong>in</strong> carmen de lona the<br />

nom. s<strong>in</strong>g, laborum.<br />

1' Const. Porphyrogen. de cerim. aidae Byzant, i. i (i. 11 Reiske) Kai rd tr/cei;?; r!hv<br />

dpaKOvapluv, \dj3ovpd re Kal Ka/xirridriKTopia, 1 append, (i. 502 Reiske) icrrafj.&wv Kal irpo-<br />

iropevofi^vwv ^/j.wpoo'Oev avrwv twv aKevQiv, Xa^ovpcov, criyviav k.t.X.<br />

^'^ Sozom. /i/si. eccl. i. 4<br />

(Ixvii. 868 A Migne) 6 ^aaiXevs sKiXevcrev dvdpas iirLar-qixovas<br />

Xpvffif Kal Xidoii Tipilois eis (rravpov (rv/j.j3oXov fieraaKevdaaL to irapd, Pw/xaiois KaXov/xevov<br />

Xd^oipov, 9. 4 (Ixvii. 1605 A Migne) ddTepov 5e twv CK7]irTptav, 6 Xd^wpov 'Fw/xaiot KaXovai,<br />

Kal ypd/nfiaTa /SatrtX^ws Xa^wv k.t.X.<br />

1 E. Gibbon T/w History of the Decl<strong>in</strong>e and Fall of the Roman Empire London 1781<br />

ii. 194 n. 33.<br />

^ E. Venables <strong>in</strong> Smith—Cheetham Diet. Chr. Ant. ii. 909.<br />

^ E. Conybeare Roman Brita<strong>in</strong> London 1903 p. 228 n. 2.<br />

* See e.g. O. Zoeckler The Cross of Christ trans. M. J. Evans London 1877 P-<br />

127 ff.,<br />

D. Parsons The Non-Christian Cross London 1896 pp. 147— 162 ('The Monogram of<br />

J.<br />

Christ '), J. B. Bury Appendix 19 on chap. 20 of Gibbon op. cit. London 1896 ii. 565 ff.<br />

•' In the Transactions of the Third International Congressfor the History of Religions<br />

Oxford 1908 ii. 192 fig. 17.<br />

'' E. Rapp ' Uas Labarum und der Sonnencultus' <strong>in</strong> i\ie Jahrb. d. Vere<strong>in</strong>s v. Alter-<br />

thutnsfreund. im Rhe<strong>in</strong>l. 1866 xxxix—xl. 116— 145 pi. 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!