Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix B: Project Delivery: Cost Information: Project Information Project Name: T3 Pier 5 Departures Walkway BCT No.: 5094 OP No.: 20706 AFC Cost Information: All information extracted from February 2009 month end process Base Costs: £4,744,186 75 % On-Cost: £1,237,277 19 % Risk (R1 Allowance only) £370,863 6 % Total (As entered into Artemis for Feb 09 Month End) £6,352,326 Commentary: Q4 spend on Scheme Design of £540,056 included in figures above. 100% of base cost total with CBi (Morgan Ashurst). Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009 Main Document-V71-IG 86
Header Information Project Name: Name in Schedule Pier 7 Stands and Loading Bridges 8002 : Pier 7 Stands Works Project Overview, Objectives and Status Overview: Description: Ref. Drawings / Images: (Refer to Appendix A) Extend the loading bridges and reconfigure the stands on Pier 7 in order to overcome existing constraints and reinstate existing dual loading bridge service for the A340-600 aircraft. None Objectives: BAA: • Improve service standards with increased loading bridge functionality. • Deliver elements of Mou’s. Airline: As above. Status: BAA Lead Team: Airline Engagement: Strategic Solution or DGS/IGS Stage Capital & Solutions Green ??? Project Delivery Current Control Budget: Total Capital Budget (Constant Prices): £3,400,000 Refer to appendix B for cost information detail. Time: Brief Start on Completion on Site: Operational Use Commences: Decision: Site: MM/ YYYY 10/ 2008 12/2009 05/2009 (Sequential Operational Use commences) Refer to appendix C for programme information detail. Assumptions: The following points cover the significant delivery assumptions related to this project; • This project is part of a programme of expenditure to enable Virgin to centre their operations onto Pier 7 and, in turn, facilitate the collocation of American Airlines and the oneworld Alliance airlines onto Pier 5, which is in fulfilment of both parties’ MoU. • The outline scope includes; • Extension of 6 number existing loading bridges, and structural repairs, refurbishment as necessary • Relocation of redundant loading bridge from stand 314 to stand 322 and associated foundation works to provide a consistent dual loading bridge service on this stand • Application of new paint markings and aircraft stop positions as required • Installation of new PAPA board markings as required • Future modifications to remote stand 365. • The agreed programme is based on the sequencing of the Pier 7 Refurbishment programme and the need to overcome existing loading bridge constraints. • Works to Stands 313 and 318 are not included within the project scope because of Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009 Main Document-V71-IG 87
Page 1 and 2:
Capital Investment Plan 2009 (CIP 2
Page 3 and 4:
3.3.2 List of Projects.............
Page 5 and 6:
1 Introduction This document is Hea
Page 7 and 8:
2 Strategy and Vision Heathrow Airp
Page 9 and 10:
joint process of consultation and d
Page 11 and 12:
HAL envisages the consultation foll
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2: High level Plan of Heathr
Page 15 and 16:
Possibilities are outlined in the P
Page 17 and 18:
transport services in the South Eas
Page 19 and 20:
• Thames Water [Which covers ongo
Page 21 and 22:
FQ41 : T5C Phase 3 FQ42 : T5D and S
Page 23 and 24:
3 Q5 Delivery During the first year
Page 25 and 26:
8275 : T4 Victor Pier Refurbishment
Page 27 and 28:
9107 : LPI2 - Kier • BCT 7049 cov
Page 29 and 30:
The Q5 CAA decision allowed for mon
Page 31 and 32:
a working level. In March 2009, fol
Page 33 and 34:
4 Regulatory and Legislative Contex
Page 35 and 36:
• Consideration of the role of co
Page 37 and 38:
to the size and character of the de
Page 39 and 40:
• the requirement for a general u
Page 41 and 42:
A principal objective for any CIP p
Page 43 and 44:
practice and provides below detaile
Page 45 and 46:
In order to publish CIP 2009 HAL ha
Page 47 and 48:
5.7 Change Control A new client cha
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 6: CCRS Dashboard. Internal
Page 51 and 52:
As a result of the process outlined
Page 53 and 54:
6.2 Discussions on Future Developme
Page 55 and 56:
6.5 Aspirations for Future CIP Publ
Page 57 and 58:
Appendices Appendix A: Project for
Page 59 and 60:
The 2006 Progress Report specifical
Page 61 and 62:
Agenda • Summary of Government de
Page 63 and 64:
Activities over the next quarter FE
Page 65 and 66:
Summary of Government decision •
Page 67 and 68:
Trigger Change Control Appendix B:
Page 69 and 70:
Appendix C: PDS - Q5 Eastern Campus
Page 71 and 72:
• Traffic modelling analysis was
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix A: Overview: Reference Dra
Page 75 and 76:
Appendix C: Project Delivery: High
Page 77 and 78:
Airline Community regarding this pr
Page 79 and 80:
The following points cover the sign
Page 81 and 82:
Header Information Project Name: CT
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Header Information Project Name: Pi
Page 91 and 92: Appendix A: Overview: Reference Dra
Page 93 and 94: Header Information Project Name: T2
Page 95 and 96: Areas of Disagreement The following
Page 97 and 98: Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009
Page 99 and 100: Appendix C: Project Delivery: High
Page 101 and 102: • Key scope assumptions for this
Page 103 and 104: Appendix B: Project Delivery: Cost
Page 105 and 106: Impact on User Charges: Not include
Page 109 and 110: Header Information Project Name: Na
Page 111 and 112: Appendix A: Overview: Internal File
Page 115 and 116: The following points cover any sign
Page 119 and 120: Operational Issues Financial Revenu
Page 129 and 130: enable a start on site 27 October 2
Page 133 and 134: Appendix D: PDS - Q5 Western Campus
Page 141: Operational Issues Note: Assumption
Page 147 and 148: • Entrance doors for zones C to F
Page 149 and 150: Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009
Page 155 and 156: those gaterooms at the end of Pier
Page 187 and 188: Revenue / Opex Cost Area: Maintenan
Page 191 and 192: Security 5 additional security lane
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Header Information Project Name: Na
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Appendix B: Project Delivery: Cost
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Header Information Project Name: T4
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
• Operational readiness will be c
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
aggage process / facilities. The nu
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Impact on User Charges: Not include
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Impact per Annum: To be developed o
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Financial Revenue and Operational C
Page 239 and 240:
Appendix F: PDS - Q5 Infrastructure
Page 241 and 242:
• Structure & Civils • M&E (Ven
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Header Information Project Name: A3
Page 253 and 254:
Appendix A Area Locations Phase 10A
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009
Page 259 and 260:
None Note: Impact on User Charge is
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Pier 6 stands to levels acceptable
Page 271 and 272:
Appendix A: Overview: Scope of Addi
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix A: Overview: Scope of Addi
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
• Southern Tango Taxiway - Block
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
per Annum: N/A due to minor nature
Page 285 and 286:
Revenue / Opex Cost Area: Revenue (
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Exclusions (covered by separate PDS
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
The following points cover any sign
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Operational Issues Financial Revenu
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
• Design safeguards for ability t
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
• The Security Projects budget do
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Description: Ref. Drawings/ Images:
Page 347 and 348:
Appendix I: PDS - Q5 Rail Project D
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
None Note: Impact on User Charge is
Page 353 and 354:
Rail Income Fare Evaluation progres
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
August 2008 Refer to appendix C for
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Appendix K: PDS - Eastern Campus Ph
Page 367 and 368:
Operational Issues • TTS Running
Page 369 and 370:
Eastern Campus Phase 2 Safeguarding
Page 371 and 372:
Appendix L: PDS - Q6 and Beyond Eas
Page 373 and 374:
None. Note: Impact on User Charge i
Page 375 and 376:
Note: Impact on User Charge is subj
Page 377 and 378:
• Demolition of BA facility Cathe
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Appendix M: PDS - Q6 and Beyond Wes
Page 385 and 386:
• Include all statutory approvals
Page 387 and 388:
Header Information Project Name: CW
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Commentary: None. Note: Impact on U
Page 397 and 398:
• 25% of whole current IDL area t
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
• Existing closed gate rooms requ
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
will draw on the experience of deli
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
The project scope is inclusive of t
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
this stage. Impact on User Charges:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Areas of Disagreement The following
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Assumptions: The following points c
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
• The requirement to remove above
Page 437 and 438:
Appendix N: PDS - Q6 and Beyond Inf
Page 439 and 440:
o This project will fund the provis
Page 441 and 442:
Appendix A2: Overview: Scope of Add
Page 443 and 444:
Appendix A4: Overview: Q6 Scope of
Page 445 and 446:
- Off Site Investment - Offsetting
Page 447 and 448:
Estimated Per Passenger Cost Impact
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Revenue / Opex Cost Area: Revenue (
Page 463 and 464:
No revenue increase. Negligible ope
Page 465 and 466:
None Areas of Disagreement The foll
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Areas of Disagreement The following
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
information is indicative only. Ass
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
Page 495 and 496:
Appendix Q: Cost Schedules Cost Sch
Page 497 and 498:
Page 499 and 500:
Page 501 and 502:
Page 503 and 504:
Trigger Milestones Internal File Na
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
show all

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?