Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Activities over the next quarter FEB 2009 MAR APR MAY • Forecasting and schedules - Procure consultant support - Begin forecast & schedule development • Surface access - Procure consultant support - Methodology review - Data collection, surveys, modelling review • Master plan concept development - Procure consultant support - Refresh of options (BAA / IATA) - Establish assessment criteria - Appoint Architects & Environmental • Programme office - Procure consultant support - Commission cost planning, programme, governance 3. Recent Developments HAL and the airline community have been in discussion on the recovery, by HAL, of the Q5 PSDH monies and the ex-post or ex-ante nature of same. On 2 nd March 2008, HAL presented the airline community with a proposal for an ex-post arrangement supported by a consultation / agreement principle. HAL and the airline community agreed to work through the proposal in further detail in order to develop a way of working on PSDH. Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009 Main Document-V71-IG 9
Trigger Change Control Appendix B: Trigger Change Control In order to cater for significant external events which could have an adverse impact on BAA’s ability to adhere to its original project schedules, the CAA proposed that there should be a clearly defined change control process for capital investment triggers incorporated within the relevant terms of the price control conditions. The CAA envisaged that it would amend the standards and rebates in one of two ways: Changes agreed by the airport and the airlines through the relevant LACC Committee and notified in writing to be approved by the CAA on an expedited basis. The process would be: • The CAA publishes any proposed agreement between the LACC and the airport inviting objections from interested parties. • The CAA then allows 28 days for any objections. • Unless the agreement raises significant issues, the CAA would expect to approve the agreement within 14 days of the end of the consultation period. • The CAA would anticipate that changes of this sort are likely to redistribute money at risk for triggers between projects reflecting changes to the anticipated content or phasing of the programme. While the CAA would be prepared to approve changes which either added to or reduced the amounts at risk it would not anticipate that this would be likely. Alternatively the CAA could revise the substance of the triggers in the price control without the agreement of users. This may occur in a range of circumstances where BAA made a formal application to the CAA for a change which was not agreed by airlines generally or which did not have sufficient support to allow the agreement of the relevant LACC committee. It might also be brought forward at the instigation of the CAA because it considered that such a change would be best calculated to meet its statutory duties. The process under these circumstances would require the following elements: • Any change to the price control condition would require the agreement of the airport operator under the Airports Act 1986. The CAA would not proceed with any prospective change unless this was expected to be forthcoming; • The CAA would publish proposals for consultation and invite interested parties to respond. • It would allow an adequate period for written submissions which would not be less than 12 weeks. • Depending on the significance of the changes the CAA may then decide to hold meetings with some of the respondents. • The CAA would publish a decision with reasoning together with any revision to the price control to reflect the new triggers. The CAA would normally seek to limit changes to the price control under these arrangements to triggers and would not seek to make other changes. In respect of A - The CAA would expect to withhold approval only in limited circumstances where it concluded that the change was inconsistent with its statutory duties, for example where such agreements: did not give adequate weight to the interests of passengers as users; Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009 Main Document-V71-IG 10
Page 1 and 2:
Capital Investment Plan 2009 (CIP 2
Page 3 and 4:
3.3.2 List of Projects.............
Page 5 and 6:
1 Introduction This document is Hea
Page 7 and 8:
2 Strategy and Vision Heathrow Airp
Page 9 and 10:
joint process of consultation and d
Page 11 and 12:
HAL envisages the consultation foll
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2: High level Plan of Heathr
Page 15 and 16: Possibilities are outlined in the P
Page 17 and 18: transport services in the South Eas
Page 19 and 20: • Thames Water [Which covers ongo
Page 21 and 22: FQ41 : T5C Phase 3 FQ42 : T5D and S
Page 23 and 24: 3 Q5 Delivery During the first year
Page 25 and 26: 8275 : T4 Victor Pier Refurbishment
Page 27 and 28: 9107 : LPI2 - Kier • BCT 7049 cov
Page 29 and 30: The Q5 CAA decision allowed for mon
Page 31 and 32: a working level. In March 2009, fol
Page 33 and 34: 4 Regulatory and Legislative Contex
Page 35 and 36: • Consideration of the role of co
Page 37 and 38: to the size and character of the de
Page 39 and 40: • the requirement for a general u
Page 41 and 42: A principal objective for any CIP p
Page 43 and 44: practice and provides below detaile
Page 45 and 46: In order to publish CIP 2009 HAL ha
Page 47 and 48: 5.7 Change Control A new client cha
Page 49 and 50: Figure 6: CCRS Dashboard. Internal
Page 51 and 52: As a result of the process outlined
Page 53 and 54: 6.2 Discussions on Future Developme
Page 55 and 56: 6.5 Aspirations for Future CIP Publ
Page 57 and 58: Appendices Appendix A: Project for
Page 59 and 60: The 2006 Progress Report specifical
Page 61 and 62: Agenda • Summary of Government de
Page 63 and 64: Activities over the next quarter FE
Page 65: Summary of Government decision •
Page 69 and 70: Appendix C: PDS - Q5 Eastern Campus
Page 71 and 72: • Traffic modelling analysis was
Page 73 and 74: Appendix A: Overview: Reference Dra
Page 75 and 76: Appendix C: Project Delivery: High
Page 77 and 78: Airline Community regarding this pr
Page 79 and 80: The following points cover the sign
Page 81 and 82: Header Information Project Name: CT
Page 87 and 88: The following points cover the sign
Page 89 and 90: Header Information Project Name: Pi
Page 93 and 94: Header Information Project Name: T2
Page 95 and 96: Areas of Disagreement The following
Page 97 and 98: Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009
Page 101 and 102: • Key scope assumptions for this
Page 103 and 104: Appendix B: Project Delivery: Cost
Page 105 and 106: Impact on User Charges: Not include
Page 107 and 108: Appendix B: Project Delivery: Cost
Page 109 and 110: Header Information Project Name: Na
Page 111 and 112: Appendix A: Overview: Internal File
Page 115 and 116: The following points cover any sign
Page 117 and 118:
Appendix B: Project Delivery: Cost
Page 119 and 120:
Operational Issues Financial Revenu
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Header Information Project Name: Na
Page 125 and 126:
Appendix A: Overview: Reference Dra
Page 127 and 128:
Appendix C: Project Delivery: High
Page 129 and 130:
enable a start on site 27 October 2
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix D: PDS - Q5 Western Campus
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Operational Issues Note: Assumption
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
• Entrance doors for zones C to F
Page 149 and 150:
Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
those gaterooms at the end of Pier
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Revenue / Opex Cost Area: Maintenan
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Security 5 additional security lane
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
The following points cover the sign
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Header Information Project Name: T4
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
• Operational readiness will be c
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
aggage process / facilities. The nu
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Impact on User Charges: Not include
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Impact per Annum: To be developed o
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Financial Revenue and Operational C
Page 239 and 240:
Appendix F: PDS - Q5 Infrastructure
Page 241 and 242:
• Structure & Civils • M&E (Ven
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Header Information Project Name: A3
Page 253 and 254:
Appendix A Area Locations Phase 10A
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
None Note: Impact on User Charge is
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Pier 6 stands to levels acceptable
Page 271 and 272:
Appendix A: Overview: Scope of Addi
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix A: Overview: Scope of Addi
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
• Southern Tango Taxiway - Block
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
per Annum: N/A due to minor nature
Page 285 and 286:
Revenue / Opex Cost Area: Revenue (
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Exclusions (covered by separate PDS
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
The following points cover any sign
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
• Design safeguards for ability t
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
• The Security Projects budget do
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Description: Ref. Drawings/ Images:
Page 347 and 348:
Appendix I: PDS - Q5 Rail Project D
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
None Note: Impact on User Charge is
Page 353 and 354:
Rail Income Fare Evaluation progres
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
August 2008 Refer to appendix C for
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Appendix K: PDS - Eastern Campus Ph
Page 367 and 368:
Operational Issues • TTS Running
Page 369 and 370:
Eastern Campus Phase 2 Safeguarding
Page 371 and 372:
Appendix L: PDS - Q6 and Beyond Eas
Page 373 and 374:
None. Note: Impact on User Charge i
Page 375 and 376:
Note: Impact on User Charge is subj
Page 377 and 378:
• Demolition of BA facility Cathe
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Appendix M: PDS - Q6 and Beyond Wes
Page 385 and 386:
• Include all statutory approvals
Page 387 and 388:
Header Information Project Name: CW
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Commentary: None. Note: Impact on U
Page 397 and 398:
• 25% of whole current IDL area t
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
• Existing closed gate rooms requ
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
will draw on the experience of deli
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
The project scope is inclusive of t
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
this stage. Impact on User Charges:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Areas of Disagreement The following
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Assumptions: The following points c
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
• The requirement to remove above
Page 437 and 438:
Appendix N: PDS - Q6 and Beyond Inf
Page 439 and 440:
o This project will fund the provis
Page 441 and 442:
Appendix A2: Overview: Scope of Add
Page 443 and 444:
Appendix A4: Overview: Q6 Scope of
Page 445 and 446:
- Off Site Investment - Offsetting
Page 447 and 448:
Estimated Per Passenger Cost Impact
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Revenue / Opex Cost Area: Revenue (
Page 463 and 464:
No revenue increase. Negligible ope
Page 465 and 466:
None Areas of Disagreement The foll
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Areas of Disagreement The following
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
information is indicative only. Ass
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
Page 495 and 496:
Appendix Q: Cost Schedules Cost Sch
Page 497 and 498:
Page 499 and 500:
Page 501 and 502:
Page 503 and 504:
Trigger Milestones Internal File Na
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
show all

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?